On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:22:18 -0600, Padraig Hogan  
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:


> 1. The idea that fruit are somehow artificially selected to have more  
> sugars is
> an extremely poor argument and it just doesn't bear out in reality.
Try eating a crab apple some time.  Follow it up with a wild plum.  That  
should
convince you.  Practically all wild temperate-zone fruits are less sweet  
than commercial fruits.  Name me a counter-example.

> 3. I accept that maybe some people really, really can't eat 100% fruit
Some people get hypoglycemia crashes by eating all fruit.  Obviously that  
doesn't
happen to you.
> and become as light as they want on it.
And just where do your proteins and fats come from?

	Lynnet