PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Partridge <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Aug 1998 23:04:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
At 08:24 PM 8/19/98 -0400, you wrote:
>T. Martin wrote:
>
>>I certainly find that white tuna is
>>better than light tuna (the "light" has nothing to do with a lower-fat
>>content).
>
>I'm pretty sure the White has a lower fat content than the Light. So I
>would go for the Light, save money and get more fish oils to boot.
>
>Don.

The problem with light tuna these days is that there's more than just tuna
in that can. Most of them have hydrolized protein in them. I have an old
can of Bumble Bee in front of me and it lists 'hydrolized protein
(casein)". I've seen other brand with what sounds like some kind of soy
filler in it.


Kathy Partridge
mailto:[log in to unmask]
Artworks website: <http://www.borg.com/~atelierk/>
|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|<>|
Atelier Golden Retrievers & Goldens Portrayed
Member GRCA, up in central New York

ATOM RSS1 RSS2