on 13/09/00 17:11, Todd Moody at [log in to unmask] wrote:

> You certainly have tried everything I could recommend.  At the
> moment, on the Anchell diet I have plateaued at 29 pounds lost.
> I also have introduced some "variations," such as the occasional
> egg or other non-Anchell food, but in the same restricted
> amounts.  I am not convinced that this is the reason for the
> stall, however.  I have reached a point where I don't need to
> lose much more, and I expect it to be very slow going now.

Well it's very encouraging nonetheless. I might get over the potato
scare
and try it.

> This is a very heretical suggestion, and I only mention it
> because you have tried so many paleo variations...  I wonder if
> something like the starch-based McDougall diet would work for
> you.  Yes, this is completely antithetical to the ideas of this
> list, but given that you have already given the paleo diet more
> than a fair shot, I thought I'd mention it.  I have a colleague
> who has done phenomenally well on that diet, so I know that it
> works well for some people.  I haven't tried it myself, and I
> have no immediate plan to do so, since my current diet is
> working, but your situation is different.

I never heard of that plan. I will search on the web for more info.


:Medusa:
[subvert and conquer : ProjectMayhem2000]