PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karl Alexis McKinnon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jan 1998 13:19:20 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Todd Moody wrote:

> I agree that pemmican is probably not toxic, although I'm not at
> all sure how edible raw suet is.

        Looks good to me.  Nothing more than hard white fat, wrapped
around those oh-so-precious kidneys.

        The difference between pemmican and sugar is that while both are
concentrated, you will only eat enough pemmican to keep you alive +.  With
a milky-way, you eat what it takes to get you full.  In addition, you eat
again later as the milkyway high lasts about 30 minuts before you are on
a sugar high.  I would hypothise that fat is not addicting, surely not the
way that carbohydrates and alergic reations are.

        Anyway, I do like to eat sun-rippened Gizpatcho beens right off
the vine.  I heard they were a relitive to the solinoid family, but hey.
I know a raw fooder who eats his gizpatcho soup, well, raw.  I went into a
restaurant and they naturally assumed I was a raw-fooder too when I
ordered my own bowl.  Darn if I wasn't upset when they brought be a cold
bowl of gizpatcho soup!  I demanded to see the manager, and made sure that
I got back a piping hot bowl of gizpatcho soup right away.  My raw-fooder
friend couldn't stop giggling for some reason.  And whenever I mention it,
he still gets a chuckle.  Weird guy, he is.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2