> I'll have to take your word that this was his argument; I don't
> feel like going back over it.  I didn't follow that argument very
> closely, since I already knew the gist of it, that reliance on
> kangaroo alone for any length of time would entail discarding
> large amount of uneaten kangaroo meat.

I suppose this is the closest you will come to saying Amadeus had absolutely
no point at all. NONE.  He is to be pitied for his self-delusions.

Andrew