On Sat, 8 Jul 2000 23:05:22 -0400, Mark Labbee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Speaking of the Skeptical Inquirer, interesting that during the 1980's they
>had to fudge the results of a study trying to refute the positive results
of
>Gaquelins's earlier studies. Too bad one of their own blew the whistle on
>the scheme, huh. Like scientists don't have agendas of their own.

This is some sort of fallacy of logic; I forget what it's called.
But also it is an example that the process works.

I guess if I have one complaint about SI, it's that while debunking
the fringe stuff, I don't see them doing the same much for
the "mainstream" religious stuff.

Philip Thrift
Paleofitness: a guide for the paleo-natural bodybuilder
http://pthrift.homepage.com/paleofitness.html