If this thread is going to turn into theology instead of paleo dieting, I
think I should ask to be removed.  If I wanted to hear discussions on the
Bible, I'd go to a bible study.

Zack




On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:27 PM, william <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On 02/29/2012 08:03 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>  Can you maybe snip us a
>
>> portion of the part about paleo, William?  Otherwise, this is odd at
>> best.
>>
>
>
>  It's right here:"The date of the end(s) of the paleolithic age could tell
> us much of what paleofood is/was/should be."
>
>
>
> Ok, I'll do your thinking for you.
> Assume that the paleolithic ended, then what caused the end?
> Assume that paleoman had not the technology to freeze Siberian mammoths in
> mud with fresh tropical veggies stuck between their teeth, raise mountain
> ranges, increase the sea level by 200 feet over the whole earth (and more
> for long enough to leave a petrified plywood ship high on a mountain), move
> the geographical pole by ~45º of latitude, lots more that I've forgotten.
> These events are odd enough to get the attention of true scientists, whose
> works then are suppressed by tier two pretend scientists.
>
> It's odd indeed that nobody has come up with a date for these events;
> McCanney seems to feel that dating is not his field and others are
> evidently suffering from iodine deficiency/bromine poisoning.
>
> Guesses, anyone? Speculation? Divination? Anything?
>
> William
>
> I killfile those who post hostile brainfarts.
>