PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nicole Markee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:54:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I think you are exactly right. Our regulatory mechanisms are
interested in survival and reproduction and are little about what we
look like in a swimsuit.

Once our prime fertile years have passed, that goes double.

IMO, of course. YMMV.

-Nicole


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 28, 2011, at 22:15, Keith Thomas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Here's an idea. Could it be that Kwasniewski's "Optimal Diet" takes us down to our optimal weight? And that the optimal weight for Homo sapiens has a few kilos more body fat than contemporary American ideals? That is, the Optimal Diet won't take you down any further simply because further is not optimal.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2