PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amadeus Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:00:19 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Alexs wrote:

>Relevant to Paleofood are the obsolete dietary and
>vitamin theories slowly giving way to more wholistic
>and broadly-encompassing hypotheses. High-fat and
>minimally-cooked animal protein bases for diet are
>heresy to orthodox nutrition "experts", ..
 (I don't talk about heresy or whatever, but)

> .. and the
>exogenous liver metabolite, ascorbate ion, persists
>in being relegated to trace nutrient status with the
>other vitamins as the so-called "vitamin C".

I'm not shure if i just don't understand this english sentence..
... what is relegated? the ascorbate ion?
                       the nutrient status?

or if Alexs states here that vitamins are obsolete from now on
or just vitamin C is obsolete?

Please enlighten me and describe in more detail what you mean.

If possible, please show your references about "vitamin C".

Interested,
Amadeus S.


--
Sent through Global Message Exchange - http://www.gmx.net

ATOM RSS1 RSS2