PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Lewandowski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 20:46:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
At 02:24 PM 09/03/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>>DAVE WROTE:
>>Genetic code is not self expressive. We actually vary very little
>>genetically. The driving force of genetic expression is lifestyle. >Mental,
>>physical, and chemical forces are what drive genetic >expression not some
>>uncontrollable invisible force.
>>>JUSTIN SAID:
>I would disagree.  I believe we all vary greatly genetically.

        Maybe I should have been more explicit. I don't consider skin,
eye, hair
or color to be anything more than falling in a range. The important
thing
to note to me is that as humans we all should have eyes, hair, and
skin in
the right places. Variations in color or expression are due to
internal and
external environmental factors. If the people below all lived together
from
birth and ate, exercised, and thought the same and were from the same
area
geographically as well as their ancestors for say the last 10,000
years
they would be very similar. Take a look at places in the world with
the
least outside influences and you will see a population with even
mundane
genetic expressions such as eye, hair, and skin color virtually
identical.
Even in a population with outside influences the offspring exhibit
genetic
traits because of what they eat, think, and do more than what seems to
be
random until closer inspection.

> Look at our variances in height (midgets and 7'0 giants and everything in
between),

        But they all grow from the same influences just not to the
same extent.

> hair and skin color (blondes, brunettes, blacks, whites, and everything in
>between),

        They all have hair was my point. Their hair is composed of the
same
materials. The same physiological process takes place in all
individuals
for the hair to grow and to be the color it is.

> genetic shape (Arnold had a huge chest, Menter's was weak; Nasser
>El Sonbaty has weak lats, Dorian Yates' lat spread looked like a total
>eclipse).
>
>Justin Hasselman

        My point was that they all needed to threaten their existing
levels of
muscular adaption to grow. The rate at which they responded might
differ
greatly but they all had the same physiological processes take place.

Dave

ATOM RSS1 RSS2