Hi William,
Although this isn't my belief, I think that most folks would say that 
the use of the term evolution may be somewhat anti-religious or at least 
neutral regarding religion. There just aren't many religions that push 
the concept of evolution.

For instance, despite the arguments that evolution has accelerated since 
the beginning of the Neolithic, based on retention of lactase well into 
adulthood, in several isolated regions of the world, the overall length 
of the GI tract is still quite similar, the vestigial appendix is  the 
rule, and comparisons with species that are better equipped to consume 
neolithic grains, for instance, show enormous differences in digestive 
tracts. I don't think that we need to deny evolution to gain credibility 
for the principles that support the Paleo died.

Best Wishes,
Ron

william wrote:
> Using the word "evolution" not a good idea, as it smells of religion, 
> and that it continued during the paleolithic negates the value of a 
> paleo diet.
>

-- 
PK