> The Warrior Diet involves DIF or daily intermittent fasting, i.e.,
> eating most or all of your food within a time window of a few hours in
> the evening.

I can't help but wonder if there could be *that* much difference between a
fast of - say - 20 hours, and a fast of 36. I seems (not scientific, I know
:) that once you've passed that hunger pang point, you're in a fasting
state. With me, I never seem to get *physically hungry* until the afternoon
anyway, and then it's just a matter of a few more hours until that 18-20
hour fast is complete.

> Now here's an another idea... What's the calorically smallest meal that
> delivers all the nutrients one needs in a day?  Can it be done in, say,
> 800 kcal of carefully chosen foods?

Which seems reasonable in the context that *if you are only going to eat
once per day, you'd better select only the highest quality food*. It would
defnitely eliminate the temptation to *cheat* on one meal knowing you would
*be good* later :)