PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Getty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:05:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Kale vs. potatoes is no contest, I agree.

P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Esben Brun" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:54 PM
Subject: Sv: Re: [P-F] tubers ?!


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Getty <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > I am eating quite a bit of turnips, rutabagas, carrots, sweet potatoes,
> > beets and kohlrabi.  But the Paleo diet seemed so
> > vehemently against Irish potatoes.  What do you think about them,
Amadeus?
>
>
> I'm also  sceptical towards white potatoes.   Are they edible raw?  (in
any
> significant quatity)
> When I dig up the first new potatoes,  I like to eat raw one or two small
> ones (but not more than that)
>
> I tend to think that the main problem with white potatoes, is that they
are
> "bland-filler-stuff ",  that
> takes up room  for better foods with more , vitamins and minerals.  As an
> example  - before potatoes came to Europe,
> kale was eaten  "instead"  of potatoes (as a winter-food).   Kale is far
> more nutritious than potatoes.
>
>
> Esben
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2