PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wally Day <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:39:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
> I think you have it right, Amadeus. I cannot imagine
> a scenario in which the
> loss of the ability to synthesize vitamin C could
> have created a metabolic
> advantage large enough to suddenly and rapidly
> overwhelm those who had not
> lost the ability.
>
> -gts

Unless the loss of the ability to syntethize ascorbate
was in fact the result of some evolutionary
"compromise" that resulted in a distinct advantage for
the "new" humans in some other fashion. I'm not
certain how energy expensive vitamin C synthesization
would be. Anyone have an idea? Or is there another
area (run faster, jump higher, keener smell..) that
could have been affected by vitamin C reduction? Or,
at the risk of sounding heretical, maybe Pauling was
incorrect in his assumptions. Maybe too much vitamin
actually inhibits or reduces something else that gives
a sythesizing species a decided "dis"-advantage.

Interesting subject.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2