PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:24:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Traditional Eskimo diet would have had adequate sodium and chloride for 
nutritional needs, possibly because there was less loss of blood than in 
our commercial system.

Also I note that completely raw meat does not need salt, to my taste. 
And yes, on raw meat it is overpowering. Maybe the kind of salt in 
blood/meat is destroyed in terms of bio-availability by cooking?

William



Marilyn Harris wrote:
> I don't know - I imagine their diet would be low-sodium but perhaps at 
> adequate levels for the type of diet so there are no cravings. They 
> may simply abhor the taste - which tends to be overpowering...
>
> Marilyn
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashley Moran" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 7:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Newbie Question - Organ Meats
>
>
>> On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:42 pm, Marilyn Harris wrote:
>>
>>> A little on Stefansson - I like what they say about salt - that the 
>>> Eskimo do not eat salt at all and do not even like it.
>>
>> Is that because their food is naturally saltier?  I imagine if you  
>> diet is more land-based and with more veg (and therefore with a 
>> higher potassium-sodium ratio) that you'd naturally crave more salt.
>>
>> Or maybe there's another explanation?
>>
>> Ashley
>>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2