PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Geoffrey Purcell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:14:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
I had always been under the impression that Creationists mainly believed in Bishop Usher's notion that the Earth was created in 4004 BC, as stated in the Bible. Since palaeolithic diet  theory, of necessity, goes at least back to 10,000 years ago, that particular theory is indeed in direct opposition to palaeolithic diet  ideas - after all, the main point of a palaeolithic diet is that 10,000 years is way too little for genuine adaptation to certain non-palaeo foods. Of course, since raw, palaeolithic diet dogma goes back even further(to beyond c. 250-000 to 300,000 years ago), Creationism is even more at odds with that particular dogma.

I had no idea that some Creationists  had earlier dates in mind than 4004 BC.


Geoff





"If you believe that the human race is old enough to have been subjected to dietary selection pressures, and that as a result became adapted to certain foods and not others, you have all you need to make sense of the paleo diet. This might exclude young-earth creationists, but that's about it. "

ATOM RSS1 RSS2