PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mrs Caroline Centa <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:32:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure this is not the RAW PLACE....  I am pretty sure it is called PALEOFOOD...  not all people who eat a paleolithic type diet follow Raw practices....  I couldn't bear eating my meat slightly pink, let alone raw...


________________________________
From: Brenda Young <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 4:21:46 PM
Subject: Re: Christmas morning yummy-ness   Re: Roast beast

Ok, I don't get it, lol.  This is the RAW PLACE, and I don't so much suscribe to all of everything, but I listen and I learn, yes.  But I for sure cook meat til it's just barely pink, and not according to "meat thermometers" and all the other BS, lol.  Haven't died yet.  Am still alve to annoy and contradict  you all,  hehe.  All joking aside, why do you all subscribe to raw eating, but you worry about temp in meat???  I am NOT being rude, just trying to understand.  

shirley sommers wrote:
>  The pork was slashed every 1/4 in through the skin and into the meat so
it was started at 450 degrees just long enough to get the skin strips to start
curling up. Then it was 250 degrees, uncovered and basted , till done.  I
thought 165 was the lowest you could go for food safety reasons?
>  
165 is the recommended for pork, but beef can be 140 for rare IIRC.
Roasting pork at 145 would be venturing into unknown territory, might taste
odd.

William


      

ATOM RSS1 RSS2