That's probably true, but it also makes sense to suppose that a
paleolithic diet that is not ketogenic and makes extensive use of
natural antioxidants would be better for longevity than the Inuit diet.

  The deer in Texas, grow smaller and don't live as long as the same species
do in say, Utah. The region a group of any species settles into, causes
stress that can alter growth, longevity, and overall health. How each group
survives each region, determines the survival of the overall species. If
people looked at the overall picture of these groups, and estimated the
average. Then they may be able to find an average paleo way to eat, instead
of arguing about which group ate best.
     `
[log in to unmask]