PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Erik Hill <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:23:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>

Along these lines, what accounts for the "gamey" flavor of grass-fed
cattle as opposed to the very different flavor in supermarket-bought
beef?  Is it just from the different fat content?  I actually prefer the
"gamey" flavor myself, but others I know despise it.

Erik


>
> > Along the same lines, why would there be a problem
> > with eating grain fed vs. free range animals (besides
> > the obvious higher fat content)? How could the adverse
> > effect of foreign proteins possibly be transmitted to
> > us through a grain fed animal?
>
> This is a tougher one.  It is *possible*, I suppose, that if an
> animal is grain-fed, some of the grain protein is not fully
> digested, leaving residues, as described above.  And it is
> *possible* that some of those residues enter the animals blood
> and remain there, so that when the animal is slaughtered, the
> blood still remaining in its tissues contains those polypeptides,
> which we eat when we consume the meat.  As I say, this scenario
> is possible in theory, but I don't know of any empirical
> confirmation of it.  That is, I don't know of any study that has
> found traces of grain proteins in meat.
>
> Todd Moody
> [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2