At 10:25 AM 2/28/2006, you wrote:
>I don't know... I still think maybe their "experts" told them that all of
>the proteins were removed and thus did not contain those allergens.

And their experts aren't totally wrong. They're saying what is likely 
valid for a significant subset of the allergic population. Trouble 
is, there may be some at the tail of the curve for which the 
conventional wisdom does not apply. And it's those (us) who find the 
sweeping statement alarming.

Bottom line, it's just not good PR to make such a sweeping statement. 
I expect that once the lawyers and PR experts have had a crack at it, 
it will say something more caveated.

Mark