IRIS Archives

Information and Referral and Internet Sightings

IRIS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sylvia Caras <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:15:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Most of the people I know who are not happy with a psychiatric 
diagnosis understand their experience as a combination of 
personality, family, community, society.  Yet most advocacy is about 
a medical understanding and reinforces the very understanding people 
don't want.

Even the more current words, recovery (from illness), wellness 
(compared to illness), brain disease (<sigh>), stigma (about 
treatment), person-centered (treatment plan), voluntary (instead of 
forced treatment), consent (to medical procedures), ...

Where are the social words, what is the social frame, how do we talk 
about tolerance and inclusion and respect, and even more important, 
what does that look like when it is in place?

Sylvia



Powered by LSoft's LISTSERV(R) list management software

ATOM RSS1 RSS2