IRIS Archives

Information and Referral and Internet Sightings

IRIS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sylvia Caras <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:54:10 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
" ... Eli Lilly and Company ... is demanding $100 million as 
compensation for what it calls "expropriation" by Canada, simply 
because the latter's courts refused to grant Eli Lilly a drug patent 
on the grounds that it didn't satisfy the conditions set down in law 
for doing so."

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130411/09574122678/investor-state-dispute-resolution-sleeping-monster-inside-free-trade-agreements-begins-to-stir.shtml

www.peoplewho.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2