IRIS Archives

Information and Referral and Internet Sightings

IRIS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sylvia Caras <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:55:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
" ... even the most respected, widely accepted, peer-reviewed medical 
studies are all-too-often deeply flawed or outright wrong; when an 
error is brought to light and the conclusions publicly refuted, the 
erroneous conclusions often persist and are cited as valid for years, 
or even decades; scientists and researchers themselves regard peer 
review as providing 'only a minimal assurance of quality'; and these 
shortcomings apply to medical research across the board, not just to 
blatantly self-serving pharmaceutical industry studies. "

http://bit.ly/ad0Ll4 (SlashDot)

http://bit.ly/bUUGgF (Atlantic - full article)


"People Who experience mood swings, fear, voices and visions"

ATOM RSS1 RSS2