INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lars Rosenmeier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:35:57 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
>From: robocap on wind <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>

le latinistas amateur (como io mesmo) generalmente ha
>un grande interesse pro un tertie typo de latino: le latino vulgar, qui 
>esseva parlate in tote Europa e in le Mediterraneo, maxime per personas 
>nate for de Roma. Per exemplo, io (ingeniero electronic) publicava duo 
>articulos in re le epistolas de Vindolandia (Regno Unite) e un studio in re 
>mi conjecturas sur le passage ab le gaulish al latino vulgar in mi region. 
>Le latino vulgar esseva le prime "lingua franca" universal, plus que le 
>greco, assi pro me le interesse in re interlingua de Peano e pois de IALA 
>esseva natural.

Car Robocap

Io non comprende totalmente: Esque tu dice que il existe un standardisation 
(independente, hodierne) del latino vulgar, que se usa inter latinistas 
hodierne e que tu ha scribite articulos in illo?

In tal caso io serea multo interessante a saper plus.

Amicalmente
Lars

--

Mi blog in interlingua: http://falcatorrosa2.blogspot.com

_________________________________________________________________
Find dine dokumenter lettere med MSN Toolbar med Windows-pc-søgning - hent 
den gratis her:  http://toolbar.msn.dk

--
Archivos e disabonar: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/INTERLNG.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2