LISTSERV - INTERLNG Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

INTERLNG Archives

Discussiones in Interlingua

INTERLNG@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	INTERLNG Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Le gurgitalitate del hebreo
From:	Ruud Harmsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussiones in Interlingua <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2020 07:25:28 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (17 lines)

[ia]: pendant (F)
[fr]: pendant
[de]: Pendant
[it]: pendant

Le plural de un parola imprestate es le plural in le lingua original. Ergo (como anque le controlo orthographic indica) pendants, non pendantes. Ma volo isto anque dicer que io de debe sequer le pronunciation original? Ergo [pɑ̃dɑ̃] pro le singular E le plural?

Personalmente me placerea plus usar le pronunciation normal de interlingua ([pendant], [pendantes]), e scriber le plural ‘pendantes’.

Occurre in mi nove articulo:
https://rudhar.com/fonetics/gurgital/gurgitia.htm


--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG