Citizen Lamin, honourable,
I both admire your sense of propriety and circumspect. I am equally inspired
by your wit and sense of humour. It has helped relax me abit. Just a bit. I
was so wound up pre-stressed concrete felt like putty. These knuckleheads
Carnegie Minerals and Yahya both take us for lollipops to be suckered dry when
ever they have a wet dream. Lamin, I think this discussion is too valuable for
our coleagues and fellow citizens here to take it private and because unlike
Yahya and Carnegie Minerals, we are trained on Gambia's interest. So forgive
me for continuing the conversation here and please advise me when you think
threshold for privacy is reached.
I understood the Fairfax case was not analogous to Carnegie Mins -Yahya &
Co.in the material aspects of the case. The reason I shared it is that like in
the Fairfax Case, if Yahya was competent, he could have easily and amicably
resolved this matter this way:
If his lab results are at variance with the agreed upon independent lab's
result, and were he minutely competent, he could have realised that the anomaly
could be a result of disparate calibrations or instrumentation. He could have
weighed on the side of caution were he to have considered the larger
interest of Gambia. He would complete the arbitration clause by suggesting a third
determinant lab that is mutually acceptable. The larger lesson of Fairfax
being sobriety and circumspect. Proactive dispensation.
If Carnegie Minerals were competent, it would not have engaged in contract
where Yahya is party based on the latter's comprehensive record and as you
posited, Carnegie Minerals fore-knowledge of potential delinquency and
non-compliance. Further, Carnegie Minerals could have insisted on propriety in the
execution of both the lease and license and at the time of any breach, should
have sought the wisdom of the mutually agreed arbitre. The relationship was
replete with non-compliance as to both parties even prior to Charlie
Northfield's abduction and imprisonment. In other words, both parties were severely
negligent as to the arbitration clause unless the clause has a specific trigger
clause understood by both parties and that their intent was manifestly to
maintain a contractual relationship. More, Carnegie Minerals keep referring to
the Gambia Government as if that was a party to the "contract" ever. And you
are not helping my sanity much when you take that reasoning. I do understand
though that you rightly take the position of innocent until proven guilty. This
is where my call to you would bear heavily on: Whether the Gambia
Government, and by extension therefore, the citizens of Gambia ought not be indemnified
in any prospective dispute between these two knucklehead parties.
This is how we, the citizens will crash this juvenile party with rotund
bouncers, gonfle'. In fact, I will try to convince you that we do not have to
crash their frolic, instead we will file suit in competent court independent of
the two of their juvenile tantrums. Please hear me out. I understand this will
go ever so slightly against the established grain, but extraordinary
circumstances require extraordinary measures. We can even convince the Commonwealth
Development Corporation that itself is delinquent to some extent.
Thanx Lamin, and please don't get upset with my tenacity and erstwhile
eccentricities. This matter is terribly significant.
Haruna.
In a message dated 2/28/2008 4:11:08 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Haruna:
I know you are tenacious and there is something to be said for such a spirit.
However, your Fairfax case is not analogous to the Gambia Government -
Carnegie dispute. In the Fairfax case a third party was not seeking to intervene
in a contractual dispute. The community was directly injured by the tortious
activities of the multinational corporation, and therefore had standing in
availing itself of a legal remedy before the competent tribunals in Virginia.
On the facts, there were aggravating circumstances, and courts do not look
kindly on such conduct especially where there is an imbalance between parties,
and huge resources are expended to frustrate a remedy. In the US, such conduct
generally attracts potentially paralysing punitive damages.
Clearly, the Fairfax matter is distinguishable from Gambia Government -
Carnegie. In the latter case, a third party intervention as you envisaged comes
up against obstacles that are not capable of legal negotiation. To accept your
premise would have direct implications for the sovereign authority of the
Government. I am not sure any court of law would travel that route with you.
I am unsure about the full contours of the Commonwealth Development
Corporation's involvement, but it is partly to underwrite the integrity of the
contractual process in the sense that the raw exercise of power routinely trumps
legality in the Gambia. As that culture is a matter of common knowledge, the
Gambia as a jurisdiction is contractually denied any role in dispute
resolution. To state it uncharitably, Carnegie was fully aware that it was plunging
into a lawless pool. Nevertheless, pertinent segments of the international
system will ensure that a valid arbitration award against either party is fully
complied with.
Do apprise me of exactly how you propose we crash into this private party
guarded by the legal equivalent of oversize bouncers.
LJDarbo
Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Citizen Lamin, honourable,
I appreciate your wise counsel as am sure our fellow citizens here
appreciate. I will reach you privately to share some ideas. I acknowledge
the
contractual nature of the relationship between Carnegie Minerals and Yahya
Jammeh and
the utter failures of the two parties to be guided by circumspect to avert
the "misunderstanding" that threatens to engulf an innocent citizenry. It is
in effect the competency of the two parties to enter into such contract that
was highly offensive.
I agree with your learned counsel that were we to accept the validity of the
contract, we will then be condemned to hopeless spectators. I urge you to
take a second look at the principle I share - that is that the contract
itself
is not issue and therefore null and void as to the citizens of Gambia. I
encourage you to consider other venue for original citizen suit than a
division
of the High court in London should that venue and officers prove unwilling
or
inappropriate audience. I am convinced that due to the delinquent nature of
the two parties in Carnegie Minerals and Yahya, we must view this matter
extra-ordinary. I am informed that the arrangement between the two parties
was
facilitated by the commonwealth development corporation and obviate the High
Court in London as venue.
As regards amicable resolution of matters such as this, I wish to share a
story with you.
Some years ago, I had the opportunity to share ideas with a multinational
corporation who was delinquent in leaking carcinogens into an aquifer body,
carcinogens which ended up in the water wells of a certain community in
Fairfax
Virginia. The corporation already had world class PR firms and Counsel. I
volunteered to visit the site and speak with the residents and discouraged
them
to rely on the litiguous prowess of counsel. Upon travelling to Virginia, I
came to realise that the community was livid because the corporation had
hidden monitoring well sample test results from them for a long time hoping
that
their (corporation's) remediation and cordoning efforts would prevent
leacheate from reaching private wells. When I returned, I advised that in
view of
such delinquency, the corporation should publish admission of error and
omission
and that they should begin to purchase affected homes at fair market value
in addition to issuing compensation for inconveniences. I also advised that
they should proactively share results of all their monitoring wells with all
the communities in which they have underground storage tanks and above
ground
tanks to include publicising remediation efforts. Needless to say, I was not
very popular with corporation brass and I was regarded with utter disdain
and
regret for seeking my advise. They recoiled to assume an adversarial
posture.
The acrimony festered, distrust prevailed. A court later found the
corporation liable and culpable to the tune of 5 times the amount it would
have costed
were they to have taken a more benign and proactive posture and admitted
error.
AND, they are still paying for a more comprehensive remediation ordered by
the court.
What I wish to share Lamin is that spectacular negligence and delinquency
calls for extra-ordinary measures. I will continue this conversation
privately
with you and hopefully to speak with you over the phone. Carnegie Minerals
and
Yahya's delinquencies must not render us victims or helpless spectators. I
am terribly disappointed at Carnegie. I am not disappointed at Yahya because
I
was not surprised at his belligerence. The record is available for all and
sundry who are trained on sobriety and circumspect.
Thank you again Lamin and I look forward eagerly to speaking with you.
Haruna.
In a message dated 2/27/2008 5:48:12 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
I meant to say "Cooperation in the manner ,,,
LJDarbo
Lamin Darbo wrote:
Haruna:
Notwithstanding that the Gambia Government's potential liability is in the
millions of pounds, the dispute with Carnegie is a simple contractual
matter.
The parties apparently settled on binding arbitration, thereby excluding any
possibility of litigation in the appropriate High Court division in London.
Even in the event of litigation, third party intervention is unlikely to
attract judicial blessing in so far as this particular dispute involves no
important principles of general public concern, effectively excluding
permission
for an amicus brief.
I appreciate your concern and public spiritedness, but in a contractual
dispute between two competent parties, you and I are condemned to watch the
contest from the sidelines. Cooperation in the matter you envisaged is
unlikely
from either party, albeit for different reasons.
In light of its apparent conduct in effectively terminating the contract
without invoking the agreed dispute settlement mechanism of arbitration, the
prospect of success appears dim for the Gambia Government.
LJDarbo
Haruna Darbo wrote:
Hello Simon,
I am in receipt of your response which I attach for my fellow citizens.
I wish to thank you for acknowledging us and we understand your position and
predisposition. We regret that both Yahya & CO. and Carnegie are averse to
recognising the citizens of Gambia as unique party to your current
dispute/misunderstanding, ample evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
I am also aware of efforts by both Carnegie Minerals and Yahya & Co.
attempting to coerce proprietors and editors of Gambia online newspapers to
do their
bidding. I discourage my fellow citizen proprietors of Gambia online news
services from yielding to such coercive advances. This is a landmark case
which
has sobering precedence. We must not sell our souls for material
considerations from unscrupulous entities.
by copy of this note, I encourage Mr. Ousman Sillah, Mr. Lamin Darboe, Mr.
Bakary Conteh, Mr. Chongan, Mr. Sanusi Owens, Mr. Halifa Sallah, Mr.
Ousainou
Darboe, Ms. Mariam Denton, to consider engaging other appropriate fellow
citizens, proficient in law and jurisprudence, and form themselves into a
Citizen
Legal Defense team with a view to protecting the interest of the citizens of
Gambia. I will volunteer, along with desiring citizens and online Gambia
newspaper editors, to form ourselves into the Public Relations arm of such
an
entity.
Lamin, please inform me if you are amenable to leading such an adhoc team of
distinguished legal advocates. I will begin raising funds for such an
endeavour. I encourage my fellow citizens in public fora to speak their
minds and
show support for forming for our defense.
Sincerely,
Haruna Darbo
[log in to unmask]
In a message dated 2/27/2008 4:21:31 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Hi Haruna
I do hope you are well, my name is Simon Elliott and I am an MD at the PR
company FD. One of my clients is Carnegie Minerals plc.
Thank you for your note of 22 February. Having taken legal counsel
regarding the referred to mining license, we have been advised that it would
be
inappropriate to send you a copy while the legal case against the company
and our
colleague is ongoing. We will however review this once the case has
concluded.
Meanwhile thank you for your support,
Simon
Simon Elliott
Managing Director
(http://www.fd-llm.com/)
Holborn Gate, 26 Southampton Buildings
London, WC2A 1PB
T +44 (0)20 7269 9318
F +44(0)207 269 9367
M +44 (0)7711 387 084
_www.fd-llm.com_ (http://www.fd-llm.com/)
London, New York, Bahrain, Beijing, Bogota, Boston, Cape Town, Chicago,
Dubai, Dublin, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Los Angeles, Manchester,
Moscow, Panama City, Paris, San Francisco, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney and
Washington D.C.
______________________________________________________________________
This email is confidential and meant solely for the use of the intended
addressee. If you have received it in error please destroy it.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duff
y/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
---------------------------------
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Inbox.
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duff
y/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
---------------------------------
Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with Yahoo! for Good
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
(http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/
2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
いいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいいい
|
