Bro. Haruna,

 

 

Ousman Conteh (O Conteh)  is the one you are debating with from Chicago. I am not refering to Ousman Ceesay. I hope that helps about Ous's mention. 

 

But here are the links about Dr. Pinkley that I promised you. 

 

 I knew Dr. Pinkney is no Obamarite. Very obvious!!

 

I goggled some of his comments and please read:

 

 http://www.blackcommentator.com/217/217_obama_trojan_horse_great_white_hope_pinkney_guest.html

 

http://www.izania.com/articles/political/black-america%27s-legacy-of-struggle/

 

See part two of my rejoinder soon, also would be reply to Ousman Ceesay.

 

Regards,

Yero. 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:54:20 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou/Yero.> To: [log in to unmask]> > > Yero my friend,> > You missed a wonderful opportunity to earn your stripes as a prolific > journalist worth admiration. I want to thank you for your regard of me as I hold > you in equal esteem. What you failed to do was to assist Jabou in recognizing > where I called the southside of Chicago as "Shitside". You did not share with > us where I did, nor did you advise due-diligence and honour in community. > Allah would have loved you for it. We must not worry too much about Haruna for > his life is an open book for all to see and comment on. Our individual > relations with Allah and Community hold more gravitasse and hope for our own > salvations. I am a bit disappointed in you too. I am not sure why you found it > valuable to drag Ousman's name in your "mediation". Ousman is a solid Human. He has > demonstrated that to us all. Ousman will not malign any in this community > for expediency sakes. I advise you forgive his name from soil.> > Your "friend" Haruna. I encourage you to work further to stand up for truth > for life's worth. For Rabbil Aalameen sakes.> > In a message dated 12/17/2007 12:40:34 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, > [log in to unmask] writes:> > > Sister Jabou & Ousman,> > Ousman, greetings there! I keenly followed the debate of my friend Haruna. I > think that he is too much into this Edwards fellow to an extent, far in his > support of him-'el d' gore.' Having said that, he deserves a pardon from both > you and Jabou. If Haruna were of the Black Panthers like my friend, Dr. > Larry Pinkney, that would have been another excuse I would take from him, for the > later alleged of Obama’s pretentious black blood but dines the opposite. > Further that he boycotted their rallies. I will check my archives to forward the > said piece which I didn’t end up publishing. But it is obvious if Obama > joins them in their activism, there is a tendency to loose the opposites' support > today. So he (Obama) is playing his politics well. > > On the other hand, Haruna’s John Edward Darboe won’t make a bad president > like some of the world’s characters observed, notably Bush and Blair moving > the world to wars. That’s a complete turn-off. > > In my view, Obama is a hope for liberation for both the minorities and the > many others trapped in the ‘color’ panorama. The latest smear campaign > against the guy about attending ‘dara’ at younger age, or being from a Muslim > family is in fact a plus to the guy. The Clinton Campaign is not scoring points > with it. In fact, hardly will any listen to them. If such is to be raised at > all, then that would violate the very religious tolerance they are preaching. > It brings to memory our Muslim brother in Congress from Minnesota whose > records of modesty is in the open-The Honorable Keith Ellision (May God prolong > his life.) The US congress came to disarray upon his decision to take oath > using the Holy Quran then. The ‘storms in the tea-cups’ then were not justified > because what you believe in, take oath with it. > > Lastly, Haruna missed the beauty of Chicago when he had an opportunity to > grace UGAMA on Labor Day (September 2007) at the mid-west conference. He was no > where to be seen or heard on the phone despite numerous fruitless efforts, > but those that did will not tease at Chicago in the way he did. > > So my challenge to him is to layout John Edward Darboe’s plan of actions.> > Otherwise, thanks for the debate, and all three of you have some educative > points.> > Regards, > Yero. > > > > > > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:39:50 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: > John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> To: [log in to unmask]> > Amen, Ms > Jabou you said it all.> > > -----Original Message-----> From: [log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask]> Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 8:11 am> Subject: Re: > John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> > > > Haruna,> I have to confess that you lost > my interest when you delved into "Chicago > hitside" Chicago shitside?> ren't > you just a tad bit angry for a discussion that is supposed to help you > in > friends and influence people on behalf of the candidate you profess to > > upport?> fter reading your last response, I had a hard time trying to discern > whether > ours was a personal anger towards Barack Obama because he was of mixed > race, > ttended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review, or was a > community > rganizer in the South side of Chicago and failed to include all > the Ghettos in > he United States in that effort and you think all of these > are supposed to be > ndictments against him or if your truly feel that the > way to promote Edwards > as to drag his opponents in the gutter?> I guarantee > you that if you ran your response by any camp of the Edwards > ampaign, they > would have asked you not to post it.> have never seen John Edwards drag his > opponents reputation or record in the > utter because he is intelligent enough > to know that this is hardly a way to win > otes and that people are sick and > tired of this sort of senseless tirades.> ohn Edwards speaks about how in his > youth, he witnessed lawyers and judges in > is native South Carolina> > > stand up against racism during the civil rights era and how they risked their > > ives and had to be escorted to work by Federal Marshalls and yet, they kept > > n. He speaks of the admiration he had for these people standing up against > > acism. He would not wonder if people would vote for Obama because he is of > > ixed race.> Edwards may have sued insurance companies and won some > judgements against them, > ut that has not resulted in any changes that prevent > insurance companies > inding loopholes to pay out claims. Just ask the victims of > Katrina.> nd the case for which Edwards won the largest judgement was for a > family whose > hild got her hair or was it a limb caught in the drainage > system of a swimming > ool.> What supporters of the various candidates should > concentrate on is to present > hat their candidate can do for the people when > elected so they can convince > oters that they are the right person and how they > do t hat matters a great > eal. Engaging in maligning the other candidate > as a strategy to win supporters > ever works and tends to be symptomatic of > some personal issue the those who > ngage in it may have. Also, when > supporters engage in the latter, they become > iabilities as opposed to being assets.> > ake it easy Haruna, rage does not draw in people, it makes them head in the > > pposite direction and it is bad for the heart. It is the people who will > have > he last word.> ow, I shall leave you to it.> abou > > > -----Original > Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: > [log in to unmask]> ent: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 6:44 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ > Haruna/Jabou.> > > > > > > Haruna," Jabou.> Yes Ma'am, hope all's well. Good to hear > you again.> > Too long winded so I will be brief." Jabou.> > cannot for the > life of me, believe mine own ears. Jabou? Dis-ease for > ong-windedness? As > Rocco Mediate is wont to quip of Tiger, If there ever were a > > ood time to > die, I'm red to go. Jabou, I'm extremely sorry for my long winds. > I will have > been remiss were I not to have been comprehensive with your > ueries of John > Edwards. In addition, I intended to share other value-added > rocess for > discernment.> > remmembered a good friend of mine, Corporate attorney Charles > McClure > hared, "Haruna, our job is to discourage our clients' customers from > desiring > etail and comprehension without running roughshod to minimalist > law. My > lients include Insurance Agencies and multi-national corporations". > The ones > ho > eem to own just about everything Jabou. "And, when it comes to > any challenge > n courts of law, we encourage fellow corporate attorneys and > judges, to > eview the entire constitution, ammendments, and precedent law". > I knew the > reat > harles was unto something. This is exactly the reason > why John Edwards > hooses cases carefully for advocacy sakes. I enjoy your long > winds from Foroyaa > > abou. I know you were being sarcastic but it struck > me befuddled.> > ow then.> > Just a few important points." Jabou.> > es. > Let'r Rip!> > Edwards fought corporate America on behalf of his clients as a > litigation > ttorney." Jabou.> > ndeed. John Edwards challenged the parts of law > that Insurance and drug > ompanies relied on to stifle claims for errors and > omissions. Indeed. Indeed. > ohn Edwards litigated profusely and with all his > might, for his clients, the > lliterate of law, the powerless to challenge > wrongdoing, and in the process, > e forced clarifications of hitherto > un-interpreted law to yield precedent > hat discouraged the culprit corporations and > other from taking refuge in > mbiguity. I am sorry Jabou. Sometimes you must > be long-winded to yield value > ontext and comprehension. I am told long > directional winds can be harnessed > or > nergy.> > When he won on behalf of > those clients, he was paid very well for his > fforts." Jabou.> > would suppose > so. Lawyers, like carpenters, doctors, masons, engineers, > nd dishwashers, > must receive value for effort and productivity. John Edwards > id not choose > to litigate just any infringement. The ones he chose to > itigate have > national and constitutional dimensions. His remuneration came > rom > hatever the > judge determines is just penalty or compensation for victims and > heir > advocate lawyer. The fees for lawyers are communicated to their clients > rior to > representation. They are normally a percentage of the settlement or > enalty > for corporate wrongdoing. Whether John Edwards was paid very well or > ot, is > not terribly significant to me. Whatever he was paid, he invested > eavily in > his foundations (the poverty center, One America, The Ninth ward of > ew > Orleans, Carolina's poor and dispossessed. All while his wife Libby was > nder > doctor's care for terminal illness. Barak, like his wife, is an > ccomplished > lawyer. They chose to side with corporate interests that John > dwards > erves > notice to. Comparative values my dear.> > He did not offer his services > gratis when he sued those corporations." > abou.> > should think not. Besides he > has his wife's medical bills to pay and his > hildren to raise. Further, were > he to have lost any of the cases, he will not > ave been compensated for his > fees were reliant on his victory over evil and > urisprudent compensation > therefrom. That is why John Edwards represented > he indigent and those of > lesser means than his fees would require. He was > onfident in the victory of > good over evil, and he took enormous risks of loss.> > Perhaps you can share > with us the major changes that came about as a result > f Edwards winning these > lawsuits." Jabou.> > 'm sorry I must be long to do your query justice my > Jabou.> > . When we desire democracy, whose cardinal tenet is The rule of common > > aw, we desire that the common comprehends law that contains the rights and > > rivileges whose aversion by other should trigger judicious challenge. In a > > ociety where there are some (possibly one partner to that law), who are > > blivious > o this rule of law and democracy indigents harp on about. That is > where the > eed for lawyers comes in. They are the bedrock of due-diligence > and > emocracy. John Edwards being a lawyer, intrinsically accrues value to > any > ociety > n which he practices.> > . Lawyers choose from several areas of > practice. Not all lawyers choose > ases for advocacy for the indigent. John > Edwards chose advocacy law. He is > aluable to democracy and equal justice > under the law.> > . When John Edwards wins his cases, a precedent in law is > established so > hat no matter which of the contiguous United States including > Hawaii that are > artner to the constitution, may rely on such precedent. That > assists in > iscouraging fraudulent practice by rogue corporations who seem > to own just > bout > verything.> > . Jabou, you and I, though never among > John Edwards' direct clientele, are > urrently benefitting from John Edwards' > legal victories. For the specific > aws and precedent, I refer you to the > public records of John Edwards' cases.> > Speaking of votes that have had a major > impact on American lives, I would > ay none top that list more than the Iraq > war." Jabou.> > ow do you mean??? I beg to differ. I do agree that the senate > of which John > dwards was a part, approved a military campaign to apprehend > Saddam and > ring him to answer to charges of mass murder and belligerent > foreboding. Many > raquis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis lost their lives and > liberties at the hand of > addam. Perhaps I would agree with you that the campaign > was badly > rosecuted. For which Edwards cannot be to blame. He saw fit > however, to > pologise for > hatever part he may have played in the cantankerous > prosecution of a > ampaign of conscience. A Solid Human. I make no apologies > for John Edwards.> > and Edwards voted for the war" Jabou.> > ohn Edwards voted > along with his coleagues to approve a military campaign > n Iraq. Not for > the Iraq war we now witness. He is being magnanimous in > emorse of poor > prosecution of the campaign. I would like John Edwards to > pprove > military > campaign against me in that manner. And I will not require apology > f him.> > and > it has impacted American lives as well altered how America is viewed > y the > World forever." Jabou.> > ndeed. Anything America does, impacts on the lives > of Americans and world > itizens in a big way. That is why circumspect and > due-diligence is advised in > rosecutions of campaigns.> > Haruna, your > amazingly harsh rhetoric against Obama is bordering on the > swift boat" strategy > of the last elections." Jabou.> > am not familiar with the Swift Boat > incident. I therefore do not consider > t in demarches. I am sorry you regard our > exchange here as harsh rhetoric > gainst Obama for on mine own part, I know no > personal cause to spurn at him, > ut for the general. Besides, in my effort > to solicit support for John > dwards, it will be utterly foolhardy to offend > other, including Obama. You and > I > ust leave open, the prospect of future > collaboration between John Edwards and > arack Obama. Here, we engage in > studious discernments and recognition of > omparative values. I advice temperance > toward John Edwards.> > you don't want the angry label being made against > your candidate to be true > or his supporters." Jabou.> > hould the angry label > be self-fulfilling against John Edwards, We will > nvent commensurate > compassion and understanding. We are children of God/Allah. > > abbil Aalameen.> > > Enough of negative campaigning already! Another reason why Obama is a > reath > of fresh air?" Jabou.> > ndeed Obama is a breath of fresh air. John Edwards > is Freshivating.> > Have a good weekend." Jabou.> > hank you my sister. As if > Allah was aware of your prayer. I made merry and > roduced value for other > this weekend. I pray for your glorious sustenance > ll weekends. Thank you for > the prayer.> > our bestest brother, Haruna.> -----Original Message-----> > rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent: > Sat, 15 Dec 2007 3:54 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > > > "Haruna," Jabou.> > es Darling, how are you. I like the way you speak and what you > say always. > ou have an immensely powerful voice fertilized, as our friend > Karim is > ont > o drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and measured tone. > Any candidate > ould like to have your support. I'm not giving up on Ousman > either. I love > im > very much. Just don't get any funny ideas Ousman.> "I do > not know that what Edwards can represent to the American people is > ot the > same as what Obama will." Jabou.> I was under the same impressions too. Then I > began a study of senators who > ater run for President in a revolutionarily > different way that reviews > arginal values. There is a wealth of information > that when properly > eviewed > r > eviewed in the directions of questions one > might have when making marginal > istinction assessments, you will come > away with a benign but discerning > onclusion. If you review the matters/bills > that Clinton, Obama, and > dwards > ave > ffered votes on in the senate, (not > the ones Obama and Clinton > onveniently > bsented themselves on for > expediency sakes), you can draw important > emographic information from their affect > on Americans, both in quantity > nd > uality > hat has brought me to the > conclusion that Edwards is a more valuable > hange to > more Americans than > either Obama or Clinton. I had also come to the > onclusion that Obama will be a > more valuable change to immigrant Americans > han > ither Edwards or Clinton, > and that Clinton is the hungriest of them all to > > ecome President. Take a > look at how many bills Obama and Clinton absented > hemselves from voting on > and find out what those bills are. Then look at > he > ills > ll three voted > on and you will notice that Edwards never absented himself > rom voting on > critical and significant matters as well as those matters > hat > re > politically inexpedient to vote on. A solid human.Let us know how your > eview looks > like.> "Also, I do not think that there is any indication that Obama beileves > in > eligion as other than a moral compass." Jabou.> Probably not and I did > not qualify Obama's belief in that realm. I shared > dwards' belief in the > realm.> bama had recognized the value of religious congregations and the almost > > omplete patronage of evangelists by Republicans. Given his political > > ndustriousness, he embarked on a campaign to wrest a slice of this section > f > > ociety > rom Republicans and rightly so. I happen to believe that you neither > court > or discount the religious evangelist vote. You allow them to choose > > ithout > iving the facade of their participation as a group in governance > and > dministration of the state. An active campaign to woo them trends too > > losely > o > uid-pro-quo and if you do not deliver their perceived quid, > they can > everely > align your administration. Only a seasoned governor and > policy-maker can > ecognize these subtle flaws in character. Because as you > know, the > vangelists > are active voters and they vote in order to skew public > policy in favour of > > heir religion. They do not hide their intentions and > motives. It takes a > trong character to resist the temptation to maligned > judgement. When you > sk > bama, he frames his responses this way:> We have to > show America that Democrats too care about religion". That > tatement itself > says a lot about his dispensation. Jabou, I know that you > re a > devout > muslim. Have you ever felt like you have to show me and Suntou and > alanding > how much you care about Islam? If you begin to run for President, > nd > you > then embark on an active campaign to show us how much you care about > slam, > > hether that is good or not, would it not give me pause in distinctions? Our > > riend Ousman shared that Obama fought for the downtrodden in the south side > > f Chicago. I will share more on this later but that southside vote was > > hat > ained Obama the state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African > > merican. When you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, > ou > > ill come to the realisation that there are other communities in Chicago > > hat > ere down-trodden for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these > other > own-trodden people of South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in North > > arolina fought for the down-trodden in other areas of North Carolina, > > outh > arolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts, Alabama, and > > alifornia. > peak with Jimmy Carter and ask him to share his views on Obama > and > dwards. He > will tell you he loves both of them but that Edwards is > more valuable to > ll > merica than Obama. It is not because Edwards is white > and more Americans > re white that is why we say this. It is because of the > quality of his > alues > nd since African Americans are disproportionately > disenfranchised in all > tates, they received the value of Edwards' efforts more > than Whites. > dwards > oes not apologise for that. When the question arose in > one of the debates > bout > bama being black and Clinton being a woman, John > Edwards responded, and in > > ublic, that whoever does not vote for Obama > because he is black, or > linton > ecause she is a woman, he, John Edwards does > NOT want your vote. Now the > ntrained eye will view this as political > suicide and indeed it costed > dwards > ome white support because they began > labelling him as an angry candidate. > f > ourse they cannot make a distinction > between anger and passion and half of > hose idiots belong in an insane asylum > anyways, we just don't have a > omprehensive mental health intitution in the > US that is why some of these > etards > ind their way on talk shows and > radio programs and TV interviews. Obama > as a > een eye on the Presidency, has > had even before the "grassroots downtrodden > dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.> "As > for being beholden to corporate America, well, all American presidents > re > somewhat beholden to corporate America, and the difference is perhaps > ust > > matter of degrees." Jabou.> Let us say you are right in the immediate above. > You are therefore > dmitting > hat corporate America does command inordinate > and a formidable power to > oerce American Presidents. The same will > therefore be true of Evangelic > merica. Now Edwards actually challenged the powers > of corporate America in > he > court of law and won overwhelmingly. He > therefore helped stem the cancer in > orporate America and enhanced the good in it > for the prosperity of America. > n > his campaign speeches when he ran with > Kerry and now, he has always served > otice that he is immune to corporate > control, no matter how formidable that > ay > be. And another thing. I think > your recognition that both Edwards and Obama > ill represent refreshing change > in the American Presidency gives you hope > hat > the two will be different > from past American Presidents. We all therefore > ake solace in the idea of an > Edwards or Obama Presidency. You will however > > gree with me that in > America, Just being President does not innoculate the > rdinary American from the > relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical and > ther > orporate interests. We > must therefore go further than just the Presidency > f > t > s the refreshing > change we are really interested in. It has come to light > hat most of Obama's > advisors are leftover Clinton advisors. You may > emmember > hen one of > those advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former > resident Bill > Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton > dvisor was > peaking of > his past relations with Bill Clinton and therefore he, Obama is > ot privy > to that and cannot say anything on it. And the former Clinton > dvisor is now > an Obama advisor. Discernments. I also would like our > rother > nd > riend > Ousman to share with us one tangible value accrued from Obama's > campaign for > down-trodden votes in south SHitown". It is evident that the > nited > teel > workers of America, The united Mine Workers of the same nation, The > > arpenters Union, and many more see more value in John Edwards than Obama, > linton, > or other. Is there a national union of the un-employed of South > hicago? We > > ay be presented with mirages of "grassroots campaign for votes" and > > grassroots conscientious advocacy".> "Having said that, Obama has spoken out > against the insurance companies who > re at the top of the food chain when it > comes to corporate America because > hey own just about everything." Jabou.> > Exactly my point Jabou. First, you should never speak against any corporate > r > individual interest because they own just about everything. That is the > > rong impetus. Now John Edwards did not stop at speaking out against rogue > > orporate policies, he challenged them in courts on the behalf of Americans > nd > > overcame their enormous powers. He is only a lawyer as was Obama. Has Obama > > > iled suit against any rogue corporate policy on the behalf of the common > > merican? Those insurance companies he "spoke out against", has he > > hallenged > hem > n a court of law on the merits or demerits of his disdain of them? > Obama > as head of the Harvard Law Review. If Obama finds himself in a > situation > here > vote-counting can yield a loss of his election to a Republican > candidate, > hat do you think will happen? What do you think Obama will do?> > "You are right, I like both Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards is > > > reat candidate, but I do not think that he will win the primaries." Jabou.> > I think you are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards as an angry > > andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of Iowa, New Hampshire, > outh > > arolina, and Nevada. We are talking about primaries aren't we???? Check > > round your neck of the woods around Cleveland Tennessee, Chattanooga, > > emphis, > ashville, Jackson, Milan, etcetera. Let us know what you find out.> "He > is good but America sees him as having been part of the old > stablishment > even if only because he ran before." Jabou.> I know you're just being > sarcastic here. Who among all candidates, > epublican or Democratic, has not been > part of the old Establishment. Don't > e > wayed > y cliches of these lunatics > who fell through the administrative cracks for > ack of enough space at > rehab.> "I think Obama on the other hand stands a very good chance of winning the > > rimaries and Americans are angry enough at the republicans so that none of > > heir candidates stands a chance in the national elections, no matter who > > hey > re." Jabou.> Indeed Jabou. I agree with you. Obama does stand a very > good chance of > inning at least one of the primaries if not all. As far as the > anger of > mericans > t Republicans, I presume you share that all the > democratic candidates > tand > qual chances when pitted against a Republican. We can > all cherish that but > et us focus for now on the voting democrats for the > democratic primaries. > hat we are trying to discern is "EDwards, Obama, or > Clinton, who represents > he > most valuable and desirable change for > Democratic Americans". After the > rimaries, we will change our effort by removing the > word democratic from > ur > uery.> "So a wonderful and winning strategy for > Democrats this time would be an > bama/Edwards ticket." Jabou.> That > wouldn't be a bad ticket either. If that ends up being the ticket it > ould be > formidable. It will be more formidable against the Republicans in > ll > f America > if it turns out to be Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton, > dwards-Obama, or > Edwards-Gore. What do you think????> "Together, they can restore the hopes of > the people and make great headway > owards reversing the damage that the last 8 > years of a Bush > dministration > as done" Jabou.> Anything is a refreshing > change from the last 8 years of cluelessness.> "Thanks for providing the link > to Ousman's blog, I had not known of it > efore. As for Andrew Young Ousman, > he dances to the music of corporate > merica > and so he has to pay the > piper so no surprises there. He has now made a > areer > f leading the pillagers > and plunderers into Africa. Dr King is no doubt > urning in his grave." > Jabou.> This is not fair. I have contributed in forming a comprehensive alliance > > gainst my person and Edwards' person. This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. > > he > wo of you simply are too overwhelming even if I summon the entire > essence > f my > very being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not > to gang up > gainst me and Edwards.> "Jabou" > What Friggin-ever. You mean > Jabou and Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New > ambians!!> Haruna.> > > ----Original > Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: > [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > > > Jabou, you know you are beautiful. I can never get upset at you.> > I think you like both John Edwards and Obama, but that you like Obama more > > ecause his election will represent much needed change.> Would you consider > that the election of John Edwards will also represent > hange?> The work > therefore is in discerning between John Edwards and Obama, who is > he more > desirable change!!!> Now, like you about John Edwards, I like Obama a lot because I > think he is > rilliant, popular, and his election will give hope to a lot of > Immigrant > mericans.> John Edwards not only represents hope for more > Americans than Obama, he has > > hown the value of the change that he may accrue > us. I have not had the > pportunity to witness a sampling of Obama's change > except that he looks > ifferent > rom past presidents.> John Edwards' One Americ> a Foundation offers some hope.> ohn Edwards' rebuilding efforts in the Lower > Ninth ward offer hope in what > > merica can be.> ohn Edwards fought with > Huge corporate outfits on the behalf of regular > nd > ommon Americans, and John > Edwards and Obama are both lawyers.> enator John Edwards of North carolina > will get dirty for you and with you.> orth Carolina used to be the home of > Senator Jesse Helms.> ohn Edwards enjoys enormous peer support and the most > endorsements from > emocratic governors of states than either Obama or Clinton.> > ohn Edwards is more electable across the United states than any candidate > > urrently seeking the presidency, Republican or Democrat. Check the stats.> > ibby Edwards is beautiful and is not beholden to corporate America. Mrs. > bama > is beautiful but may be beholden to corporate America. She sits on > he > > board of Walmart.> ohn Edwards is handsome and is not given to religious > distinctions nor > oes > e believe religion ought to be mixed with governance. John > Edwards > elieves > n Religion as moral and ethical compass, not > administrative compass.> Obama is good. John Edwards is more valuable to all America. > Edwards-Obama > ay be formidable. What do you think my dear? Lemme know, Lemme > know!! You > now > usman is an Obama-head!!! Don't you??> Your friend and > colleague Haruna. > In a message dated 12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard > Time, > [log in to unmask] writes:> Haruna,> I both like and have a great deal of > respect for John Edwards and his wife > lizabeth for many reasons, some of > which are mentioned below. However, > > m > n Obama supporter myself. I also > think Obama has a better chance of > eing > lected because among other > things, he is seen as the "change" candidate > y > country that desperately needs > change and Hillary ain't it. Infact, I > hink Hillary has turned into a "snake > oil sales lady" and she is > verything to > everyone in her zeal to be > president and I do not trust her at all and the > est of the country is beginning > to see through her. I think that Edwards' > est > shot will be as a V.P for > Obama. I think together they would make an > wesome > eam.> ow, now, don't get > too upset.> abou> > > > > ----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo > <[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 > 6:49 pm> ubject: I wish to share John Edwards with you:> > > > > > e just > concluded another conference call with David Medina, the national > > ampaign > director for John Edwards.> We are excited about the prospects for a John Edwards > Presidency. We are > leased to have the support of Harry Belafonte and Danny > Glover in South > arolina. Our gratitude to the United Steel workers Union, > The Mine > orkers > Union, > he Carpenters Union, and Friends of the Earth > Action Network. I am proud > f > ohn Edwards' performance in the just concluded > democratic candidate > ebate > > ponsored by the Des Moines Register. John > Edwards is humble, intelligent, > nd > tands up for the Common American even > on unpopular issues. He has vision > > nd > haracter, attributes that are > extremely valuable to American foreign > olicy > nd stature in the world.> We > would like volunteers to assist in South Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, and > ew > > Hampshire. We also wish to ask for your financial support if your time > ill > ot > allow volunteering. Please visit us at _http://www.johnedwards.com_ > > http://www.johnedwards.com) and thank you for your support and company > oward > > > ne-America.> Haruna.> > > > *************************************See AOL's > top rated recipes > http://food.aol.> com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> o > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > > nterface> t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the > Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> > [log in to unmask]> > ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________> ore new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - > > ttp://webmail.aol.com> > o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go > to the Gambia-L Web > nterface> t: > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please > send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]> > > > ________________________________________________________________________> More new features than > ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com> > > ����������������������������������������������������������> To > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > interface> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search > in the Gambia-L archives, go to: > http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> > [log in to unmask]> > ����������������������������������������������������������> > _________________________________________________________________> Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.> http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_122007> > > > > > > **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)> > ����������������������������������������������������������> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]> ����������������������������������������������������������> 

_________________________________________________________________

Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!

http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlhmtextlink1_dec