Dampha,
You have declared your position very clearly. Why castigate others, shouldn't you leave other people to
decide what they want if a coalition of all opposition parties proves to be unworkable in the first round?
You mention that I was cautioning you not to talk about an opposition alliance. I hope now you will
understand why. I was right in doing so because I knew what was happening on the ground.
You claimed that PDOIS was publishing materials detrimental to an opposition alliance, you even claimed that
Dibba gathered information from this to take a stand. This shows gross dishonesty in the presentation of your
position. Instead of seeing Dibba's action and the cooperation between PPP and UDP as a confirmation of what
Foroyaa wrote, you prefer to accuse Foroyaa of disrupting opposition alliance by exposing the root cause of
the disruption.
I hope you will at least start behaving like a democrat by giving support to the candidate of your choice and
leave others to support the candidate of their choice.
Adama
The struggle to uplift human dignity continues!

Dampha Kebba wrote:

> Brother Hamjatta, well put. To say that I am disappointed in PDOIS and NCP
> would be the understatement of the year. And I cannot believe that this is
> the same Bah fellow that was cautioning me not to talk about an Opposition
> Alliance when his own Party (PDOIS) was publishing material detrimental to
> an Opposition Alliance. The insincerity evinced here by Bah and his Party is
> just mind-boggling to me. I counsel Bah to reread what I wrote and also read
> PDOIS’ article and tell us which piece was detrimental to a Coalition.
> Whereas I tried to bring everyone under one umbrella, PDOIS was busy
> nitpicking about who was registering a Party, who belonged to which Party
> during the former regime, who financed which Party etc. I was tempted, like
> you, to tell PDOIS that its posture was NOT helping anyone but Yaya. But I
> did NOT want to say anything to split the Opposition.
>
> Now that the Meeting has taken place and the lines are drawn, I hope PDOIS,
> NCP and their supporters get the message that they are NOT part of the
> Alliance (as we speak). As such, they will be treated in the way they
> deserve. As you rightly pointed out, ALL the other Opposition Parties
> (including NRP) are rallying behind Ousainou Darboe. He is our presidential
> candidate. He deserves our support and in my opinion he earned it too. I
> take this opportunity to appeal to PDOIS and NCP to be pragmatic. We are NOT
> talking here about parliamentary elections. We are talking about one post:
> President. Only one person can be president. Sidia Jatta and Halifa Sallah
> and SM Dibba CANNOT be president at the same time. Any person voting for
> these people will be registering a ‘wasted vote’. But worse still, any vote
> that is NOT given to Ousainou Darboe, is a plus for Yaya. I hope that the
> NCP and PDOIS supporters realize that if they persist in this avenue they
> would be as responsible for the ‘election’ of Yaya in the same way as APRC
> supporters.
>
> This appeal is a good faith appeal, premised on the belief that every vote
> is important. The Opposition Alliance should seek to capture every vote.
> That should be the target. I am confident that at the end of the day
> commonsense will prevail among Gambians. Gambians will realize who among all
> the Opposition candidates is more ‘electable’ and rally behind him. I
> frankly cannot understand how a man like Dibba can honestly claim that he
> earned the nomination. I look forward to hearing the rationale he is going
> to give for his stance. I saw Buhary’s optimistic view and I sure hope that
> he is right. However, something tells me that Dibba might have read too much
> into PDOIS and APRC propaganda that UDP is made up mainly of NCP supporters.
> To Dibba, I will say that the same people that are now saying that UDP is
> NCP incarnate, were at one time saying that UDP was/is a PPP front. The
> truth of the matter is that UDP is a broad-based Party made up of GAMBIANS
> that do NOT like the AFPRC/APRC government; Gambians that want to move
> forward and lift our people up from poverty and destitution and mayhem. UDP
> is a front for PPP, NCP, PDOIS, and GPP. The UDP membership is made up of
> people from ALL the political parties during the Jawara era, just like APRC
> is made up of people from all the aforementioned parties. So this notion
> that Dibba has to snap a finger and get NCP supporters from UDP, is
> ludicrous. I hope at the end of the day, commonsense and patriotism visits
> Dibba. I hope people like Dembo Bojang (UDP MP in Bakau) convince Dibba to
> do what is right. The man has NOT earned the presidency. I also sense that
> the parties that decided not to join the Coalition are also calculating that
> even if they do not join, they will benefit from concessions made to parties
> like the PPP. For instance, the constitutional changes in the transitional
> period will benefit all parties. But PDOIS and NCP have to realize here that
> people will NOT forget this treacherous stance. At the end of the day, UDP
> might implement a level playing field, but the parties that did NOT join the
> Coalition will be reminded about their stance when it is all said and done.
> When the field is level, we will tell the Gambian people on whose side PDOIS
> and NCP was during the battle to unseat Yaya.
>
> Hamjatta, like you, I am totally disappointed in PDOIS’ encore of their
> stance during the London Briefing. Here we go again with form over
> substance. I cannot believe that PDOIS will use such a spurious excuse in
> order not to partake in a Meeting of this magnitude. A Meeting that will
> determine the future of our country. They would NOT attend because they did
> not get a letter from Assan Musa Camara? What’s next? Had the letter arrived
> by post, would they have insisted that they want a courier delivered mail?
> This is preposterous. And to add insult to injury, they pretend that people
> were working behind their back. PDOIS was aware of the Meeting slated for
> Thursday. When that did not materialize, because as you said Hamat Bah was
> out of town, PDOIS was also informed about the Monday Meeting in the same
> way others were informed. Instead of getting to the substance of the matter,
> they are preoccupied by form. Sent journalists to ask Darboe whether he
> received a letter from the convener of the Meeting. This was all to show
> that Darboe was given preferential treatment in order to prove PDOIS’
> childish case of being left out. When they realize that Darboe also did NOT
> receive a letter, they now say that there was collusion in inviting Darboe.
> Whichever way you look at it, we are dealing here with people that are
> finding every excuse in the book to justify what was clearly poor political
> judgment. If Darboe gets a letter, he is damned. If he does not get a
> letter, he is damned. Was Assan Musa Camara also colluding with PDOIS when
> he contacted them about the Meeting and spoke to them on the phone?
>
> This Party is the same Party that was telling us few days ago in their
> ill-advised publication that time was of the essence. We should act quickly
> in order to get rid of indecisiveness. Now, when it was time to act, they
> start talking about postponing a Meeting in order to receive a letter and
> convene a ‘proper’ meeting. I hope PDOIS supporters engage their leaders
> frankly. They can either be part of the solution or the problem. If they are
> more comfortable joining the APRC in the trenches and spreading an
> anti-Jawara message, find with us. Jawara is NOT running and this election
> is NOT about Jawara. This election is about Ousainou Darboe and a brand new
> Gambia we have NEVER seen before. We are looking forward and NOT backwards.
> Let the campaign begin next Sunday, August 18, 2001. We can hold our own
> against any Party in the country, be it PDOIS, NCP or APRC or an alliance of
> all three parties. Gambians know evil when they see it. Gambians know that
> Yaya is NOT good for them. At the end of the day, people will vote for the
> Opposition Alliance because they will realize that that is the best chance
> of removing Yaya from office.
>
> Finally, I take this opportunity to extend my heartfelt thanks to Assan Musa
> Camara for the tremendous job he did in bringing this Alliance together.
> History will judge Mr. Camara kindly. He has shown great patriotism and
> selflessness. I pray that God grant him long life and wisdom to continue to
> lead in the manner he just did. The other members of the Alliance also
> deserve our commendation and support. The stance taken by PPP is especially
> commendable. Notwithstanding attacks from all angles, including Opposition
> quarters, people like OJ stayed focus on the prize. This is what pragmatic
> leadership is all about. I also hope that Darboe accepts this honor
> gracefully and realize the magnitude of the trust and responsibility reposed
> on him. He should seek to bring all Gambians together to eradicate evil in
> our midst.
> KB
>
> >From: Hamjatta Kanteh <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
> ><[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: On The Opposition Alliance
> >Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:49:45 EDT
> >
> >Mr Bah,
> >
> >I will judiciously ignore your scurrilous and snide remarks. Suffice to say
> >that they are baseless and irrelevant.
> >
> >As per your comment how informed i am about the situation on the ground, i
> >can assure you that i'm very informed about the general political situation
> >back home. Matter of fact when the scheduled Opposition meeting was going
> >on
> >today, i was duly informed of the players and constituents involved and the
> >circumstances. In this age of the internet and wireless communications, you
> >would be surprised the extent to which people are informed about things in
> >far off places and remote corners of the globe. Never assume that just
> >because we happen to be temporarily residing outside the Gambia means we
> >are
> >totally in the dark about what goes on in the country - generally.
> >
> >Some of the comments in your previous correspondence are plainly a
> >distortion
> >of how things chanced. For instance you commented:
> >
> >"Are you aware that the UDP had made an announcement endorsing Darboe as
> >its
> >presidential candidate and are to
> >launch their campaign on the 18th. of August? Are you aware that only the
> >PPP
> >endorsed Darboe's candidature
> >at a meeting which was suppose to be an all opposition party meeting
> >without
> >any invitation to PDOIS or NRP?"
> >
> >This is a gross misrepresentation of the facts. For starters, all parties -
> >registered and non-registered - were duly invited to attend this meeting.
> >Certainly, it was the case that the PDOIS was formally informed of this
> >meeting as was case with the NRP. As it happened, the NRP leader was out of
> >town and the meeting had to be re-scheduled twice in lieu of this. Only
> >this
> >because of time constraints, was the meeting allowed to progress ahead
> >without the NRP leader partaking in the political horsetrading. So it was
> >grossly misinforming - to say the very least - your assertion that both NRP
> >and PDOIS weren't invited to the talks. I repeat ALL parties were invited
> >to
> >take in the said talks. As i understand it, the NRP leader has conveyed
> >through third parties its endorsement - in principle - of how these talks
> >were generated and progressed. One shouldn't be surprised to see Hamat Bah
> >endorsing the current Alliance plans upon his return.
> >
> >Contrary to what you said, it was not the UDP that exclusively selected Mr
> >Darbo to lead the coalition; rather, it was OJ who put forward Mr Darbo's
> >name as a leader of the Alliance and this was seconded by the majority of
> >the
> >delegates. It was only after this nomination that Mr Dibba felt that he
> >couldn't be part of the current scheme of things because he felt he had to
> >lead the coalition. That is a regrettable and regressible development. But
> >it
> >is not true that it was the PPP and the UDP that exclusively conspired and
> >colluded by nominating and seconding Mr Darbo's ascension to the leadership
> >of the Alliance. It is, therefore, a fabrication of how things materialised
> >to suggest that PDOIS or any other party was stitched out of partaking in
> >the
> >negotiations. Or to say there was a PPP-UDP conspiracy that treacherously
> >plotted against the other parties - as your correspondence seemed to me to
> >suggest. Furthermore, it ought to be claified here again that it was not
> >the
> >UDP which announced Mr Darbo as their presidential candidate and that they
> >will begin their campaign on the 18th of August. Rather, this was an
> >Alliance
> >position and not a unilaterally imposed UDP one.
> >
> >PDOIS' lack of engagement in the current scheme of things and its desire to
> >start sullking again about being left out is no one's fault but its own
> >making. By their own admission, PDOIS acknowledged through it's political
> >organ, Foroyaa, that the UDP had invited ALL parties to join it on its
> >campaign trail but it [PDOIS] failed to seize the initiate and engage the
> >UDP
> >and the other parties on issues that are common to all parties. Instead, it
> >is now descending to its old pastime of phobic PPP and Jawara caricatures
> >and
> >unwittingly doing Jammeh's dirty work for him. If PDOIS is serious about an
> >Alliance it would have proactively reached out to the others with
> >open-minded
> >altruism, generate their trust that ultimately will act as a repository of
> >mutual cooperation without which an Alliance will ultimately flounder.
> >Despite the hisses and sulks that emanated from the PDOIS, it has never
> >publicly initiated mechanism that can help finesse any obstacles that might
> >later hinder an Alliance progrss. PDOIS also whined and sulked about a lack
> >of agenda and a framework for possible cooperation with the other parties.
> >Did PDOIS take the initiative by coming up with an agenda and a framework
> >that can be used as basis for mutual cooperation with the other parties?
> >Rather, PDOIS, through its political organ, Foroyaa, whined and sulked
> >about
> >how they are being left out the scheme of things. Oh, and reducing the
> >paper
> >into a recycling plant of APRC rumours and disinformations. Is this the way
> >a
> >party interested in cooperation handles itself? Does sniping maliciously
> >about your would-be Alliance partners in your paper the way to win their
> >confidence and trust? Gauging by the manner in which it has goofed on the
> >Alliance progress, i want to suspect that PDOIS has misgivings - that it
> >has
> >never bothered spelling out to the public - that was left with no choice
> >but
> >to sulk and whine incessantly about what have done or might have done.
> >PDOIS
> >has no one to blame for its predicament but itself.
> >
> >Take for instance PDOIS' lack of attendance of yesterday's talks. Having
> >weighed the evidence, it seems to me PDOIS exploited the procedural
> >discrepancies of not receiving an official letter from the convenor of the
> >said talks and decided not to attend the talks on such flimsy grounds. This
> >is lamentable. For none of the other parties that attended the talks
> >received
> >no official letters from the convenor of the said talks. Yet, that never
> >stopped them from attending the talks. This is not the first PDOIS has used
> >such dissembling arguments to masquerade their unwillingness to be part of
> >the collective effort. With the London Briefing Sessions, it used similar
> >subterfuges an excuse not to attend that as well. The fact of the matter is
> >that of all the good things that can be said of the PDOIS, cooperation with
> >the mainstream parties ain't amongst them. PDOIS has simply shown that it
> >has
> >a deep seated ambivalence towards the Alliance from the moment it was
> >mooted.
> >PDOIS was never honest enough to publicly state this deep seated
> >ambivalence.
> >
> >Ultimately, i respect PDOIS' right to do as they deem fit or as their
> >consciences dictate to them. Similar respects are extended to Mr Dibba and
> >the NCP. I hope, before it is too late, Mr Dibba can be persuaded that his
> >party's interest is best served by joining the Alliance and working with
> >them
> >to defeat the dictatorship. What, however, would be unbecoming of the PDOIS
> >is to start working unwittingly for the APRC by doing its dirty for it;
> >i.e.,
> >  whipping up anti-  PPP sentiments and caricatures to the extent that it
> >serves as an allure to the dictatorship. That, in my opinion, would do
> >PDOIS
> >no favours. For it is such retrogressive acts that strengthen the hand of
> >the
> >devil that continues to wreak havoc on Gambian lives and the Gambia. I
> >sincerely hope that PDOIS this time around heeds the writings on the wall.
> >
> >Hamjatta Kanteh
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
> >Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
> >You may also send subscription requests to
> >[log in to unmask]
> >if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your
> >full name and e-mail address.
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
> Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
> You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
> if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------