GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"A. P. Dampha" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Jul 2000 10:15:41 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Hello,

I very much share Ginnys view.
On one hand they are at present thinking of debt relief for Africa and on
the other they are offering new credits.
What kind of policy is this?

Anyway as far as I am informed there is currently no drug available that
could cure or protect from AIDS. But isn’t it that the pharmaceutical
industry wants to sell their products?
Haven’t we hared such tunes before? (I think of the baby food).

It seems to be a well established practice to grant loans to developing
countries in order to boost sales for national industries/companies. I hope
Africa will take care and not take the bite this time.

Why are the US currently forcing this AIDS campaign?
I was wondering.

For quite some time I see the US campaign on AIDS in Africa in way that it
is
used as an advertising campaign against Africa.

Aids is in all countries of this world. And in some it is even more rampant
(Asia).
So why do they point their fingers on Africa?

Let’s go back in history. Why did they fight Malaria? Humanity?
I don’t think so. It seems they had interest only in solving their own
problems in it in the US and in Europe and they feared, that US soldiers in
Asia might have been effected.
Since the problems in Europe and US are solved or under control now and war
in Asia is no longer maintained,
the fight against Malaria is no longer important to them. Besides, according
to my information Florida still spends a $300 Mio per year to spray the
country in order to keep it free from Malaria. But there is big tourism,
Disney World, rich peoples residency, money.... Who cares for Africa?

But still Malaria is in Africa the disease causing the majority of death
(not AIDS as far as I am informed).Maybe, nobody is interested any more
because it is safe for US and Europe. Malaria cannot be transferred by a
tourist. AIDS can!

And the pharmaceutical industry?
They are spending a lot of money developing medication and injections,
knowing that the formula they develop are designed to evolve resistancy from
the parasite soon, if treating at all. Such research programs are easily
sponsored. But I have not yet heard from research in the field of
eradicating Malaria in Africa. I recently hared about a drug, that is to
cure Malaria safely. It is a traditional Chinese treatment extracted from a
plant called "Artemisia". First this was kept secret from the Chinese for
political reasons. Now it is currently tested by WHO. But as it can not be
produced technically but must be extracted directly from the plant (as far
as I know) I have not seen any company being prepared to make this drug
accessible to people. It is not an interesting market.


By for now
Angelika

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2