GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:01:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (426 lines)
Haruna,



What the heck do you know about Obama's south side of Chicago's background or history, I have lived in Chicago for almost 14 years now and can tell you that your facts "assumptions" are freaking ridiculous, you are just another pondant, indeed a tribble one if i may note. I met and had a conversation with the man, he is a gentleman and an honourable one infact.

I have been a member of he Gambia-L for a long time now, i have read great stories and views from different contributors but you are just a freaking "bull-shitter" who seems to have views on every topic. 



-----Original Message-----
From: Ousman Ceesay <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna




Haruna wrote:
"When  you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, you will come 
o the  realisation that there are other communities in Chicago that were
own-trodden  for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these other 
own-trodden people of  South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in North 
arolina fought for the  down-trodden in other areas of North Carolina, South 
arolina, Georgia,  Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts, Alabama, and 
alifornia."
The comparison here is kinda moot. Obama graduated from Harvard and chose to 
rganize a community blighted by factory closings.Were there other communities 
n similar situations? You bet. You still have them all over this country today. 
owever comparing the efforts of a recent college graduate (Obama) with that of 
 candidate(Edwards) running for state wide office is a stretch. For starters 
he former is just scrapping by while the latter has the resources of a campaign 
o amplified his message.
Edwards maybe the son of mill workers, but he hasn't organize those communities 
hen the mills closed down. Instead he lawyered on and made millions in the 
rocess. I am not mad at him for going for the benjamins.However, in comparison 
o Obama, he is johnny come lately when it comes to advocating for the poor. 
He has a populist message, but some of his approach to solving poverty issues 
re elitist. Take for instance the poverty center he sponsored at University of 
orth Carolina to bring policy experts to study how to get people out of 
overty.This kind of policy studies has been going on in almost all elite 
niversities in the country albeit under different names. A community organizer 
ike Obama with that kind of mullah will go with practical solutions rather than 
unding centers to produce some more policy papers. There is a gloat of policy 
apers rotting in institutions all over this country. The problem is lack of 
unds for implementation.
Alright, I have riled you up enough for the night. I will sit back and 
elax...waiting for the cult of Edwards to kick in...incoming....



aruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:  
Haruna," Jabou.
 
es Darling, how are you. I like the way you speak and what you say  always. 
ou have an immensely powerful voice fertilized, as our friend Karim is  wont 
o drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and measured tone. Any candidate  
ould like to have your support. I'm not giving up on Ousman either. I love him  
very much. Just don't get any funny ideas Ousman.

I do not know  that what Edwards can represent to the American  people is 
ot the same as what Obama will." Jabou.

 was under the same impressions too. Then I began a study of senators  who 
ater run for President in a revolutionarily different way that reviews  
arginal values. There is a wealth of information that when properly  reviewed 
r 
eviewed in the directions of questions one might have when making  marginal 
istinction assessments, you will come away with a benign but  discerning 
onclusion. If you review the matters/bills that Clinton, Obama, and  Edwards 
ave 
ffered votes on in the senate, (not the ones Obama and Clinton  conveniently 
bsented themselves on for expediency sakes), you can draw  important 
emographic information from their affect on Americans, both in  quantity and 
uality 
hat has brought me to the conclusion that Edwards is  a more valuable change to 
more Americans than either Obama or Clinton. I had  also come to the 
onclusion that Obama will be a more valuable change to  immigrant Americans 
han 
ither Edwards or Clinton, and that Clinton is the  hungriest of them all to 
ecome President. Take a look at how many bills Obama  and Clinton absented 
hemselves from voting on and find out what those bills  are. Then look at the 
ills 
ll three voted on and you will notice that Edwards  never absented himself 
rom voting on critical and significant matters as well  as those matters that 
re politically inexpedient to vote on. A solid  human.Let us know how your 
eview looks like.

Also, I do not think that there is any indication that Obama beileves in  
eligion as other than a moral compass." Jabou.

robably not and I did not qualify Obama's belief in that realm. I shared  
dwards' belief in the realm.
bama had recognized the value of religious congregations and the almost  
omplete patronage of evangelists by Republicans. Given his political  
ndustriousness, he embarked on a campaign to wrest a slice of this section of  
ociety 
rom Republicans and rightly so. I happen to believe that you neither  court 
or discount the religious evangelist vote. You allow them to choose  without 
iving the facade of their participation as a group in governance and  
dministration of the state. An active campaign to woo them trends too  closely 
o 
uid-pro-quo and if you do not deliver their perceived quid, they can  severely 
align your administration. Only a seasoned governor and policy-maker  can 
ecognize these subtle flaws in character. Because as you know, the  evangelists 
are active voters and they vote in order to skew public policy  in favour of 
heir religion. They do not hide their intentions and motives. It  takes a 
trong character to resist the temptation to maligned judgement.  When you ask 
bama, he frames his responses this way:
We have to show America that Democrats too care about religion". That  
tatement itself says a lot about his dispensation. Jabou, I know that you are a  
devout muslim. Have you ever felt like you have to show me and Suntou and  
alanding how much you care about Islam? If you begin to run for President, and  
you then embark on an active campaign to show us how much you care about Islam, 
whether that is good or not, would it not give me pause in distinctions? Our 
friend Ousman shared that Obama fought for the downtrodden in the south side 
f  Chicago. I will share more on this later but that southside vote was what 
ained  Obama the state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African 
merican. When  you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, you 
ill come to the  realisation that there are other communities in Chicago that 
ere down-trodden  for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these other 
own-trodden people of  South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in North 
arolina fought for the  down-trodden in other areas of North Carolina, South 
arolina, Georgia,  Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts, Alabama, and 
alifornia. 
peak with Jimmy  Carter and ask him to share his views on Obama and Edwards. He 
will tell you he  loves both of them but that Edwards is more valuable to all 
merica than Obama.  It is not because Edwards is white and more Americans 
re white that is why we  say this. It is because of the quality of his values 
nd since African Americans  are disproportionately disenfranchised in all 
tates, they received the value of  Edwards' efforts more than Whites. Edwards 
oes not apologise for that. When the  question arose in one of the debates 
bout 
bama being black and Clinton being a  woman, John Edwards responded, and in 
ublic, that whoever does not vote for  Obama because he is black, or Clinton 
ecause she is a woman, he, John Edwards  does NOT want your vote. Now the 
ntrained eye will view this as political  suicide and indeed it costed Edwards 
ome white support because they began  labelling him as an angry candidate. Of 
ourse they cannot make a distinction  between anger and passion and half of 
hose idiots belong in an insane asylum  anyways, we just don't have a 
omprehensive mental health intitution in the US  that is why some of these 
etards 
ind their way on talk shows and radio  programs and TV interviews. Obama has a 
een eye on the Presidency, has had even  before the "grassroots downtrodden 
dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.

As for being beholden to corporate America, well, all American  presidents 
re somewhat beholden to corporate America, and the difference is  perhaps just 
 matter of degrees." Jabou.

et us say you are right in the immediate above. You are therefore  admitting 
hat corporate America does command inordinate and a formidable power  to 
oerce American Presidents. The same will therefore be true of Evangelic  
merica. Now Edwards actually challenged the powers of corporate America in  the 
court of law and won overwhelmingly. He therefore helped stem the cancer in  
orporate America and enhanced the good in it for the prosperity of America. In  
his campaign speeches when he ran with Kerry and now, he has always served  
otice that he is immune to corporate control, no matter how formidable that may  
be. And another thing. I think your recognition that both Edwards and Obama 
ill  represent refreshing change in the American Presidency gives you hope that 
the  two will be different from past American Presidents. We all therefore 
ake  solace in the idea of an Edwards or Obama Presidency. You will however  
gree with me that in America, Just being President does not innoculate the  
rdinary American from the relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical and  other 
orporate interests. We must therefore go further than just the Presidency  if 
t 
s the refreshing change we are really interested in. It has come to light  
hat most of Obama's advisors are leftover Clinton advisors. You may remmember  
hen one of those advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former 
resident  Bill Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton 
dvisor was 
speaking of his past relations with Bill Clinton and therefore he, Obama is 
ot  privy to that and cannot say anything on it. And the former Clinton 
dvisor is  now an Obama advisor. Discernments. I also would like our brother 
nd 
riend  Ousman to share with us one tangible value accrued from Obama's 
campaign for  down-trodden votes in south SHitown". It is evident that the 
nited 
teel  workers of America, The united Mine Workers of the same nation, The 
arpenters  Union, and many more see more value in John Edwards than Obama, 
linton, or  other. Is there a national union of the un-employed of South 
hicago? We 
ay be  presented with mirages of "grassroots campaign for votes" and 
grassroots  conscientious advocacy".

Having said that, Obama has spoken out against the insurance companies  who 
re at the top of the food chain when it comes to corporate America because  
hey own just about everything." Jabou.

xactly my point Jabou. First, you should never speak against any  corporate 
r individual interest because they own just about everything. That is  the 
rong impetus. Now John Edwards did not stop at speaking out against rogue  
orporate policies, he challenged them in courts on the behalf of Americans and  
overcame their enormous powers. He is only a lawyer as was Obama. Has Obama  
iled suit against any rogue corporate policy on the behalf of the common  
merican? Those insurance companies he "spoke out against", has he challenged  
hem 
n a court of law on the merits or demerits of his disdain of them? Obama  
as head of the Harvard Law Review. If Obama finds himself in a situation where  
vote-counting can yield a loss of his election to a Republican candidate, 
hat  do you think will happen? What do you think Obama will do?

You are right, I like both Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards  is a 
reat candidate, but I do not think that he will win the primaries."  Jabou.

 think you are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards as an  angry 
andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of Iowa, New  Hampshire, South 
arolina, and Nevada. We are talking about primaries aren't  we???? Check 
round your neck of the woods  around Cleveland Tennessee,  Chattanooga, 
emphis, 
ashville, Jackson, Milan, etcetera. Let us know what you  find out.

He is good but America sees him as having been part of the old  
stablishment even if only because he ran before." Jabou.

 know you're just being sarcastic here. Who among all candidates,  
epublican or Democratic, has not been part of the old Establishment. Don't be  
wayed 
y cliches of these lunatics who fell through the administrative cracks  for 
ack of enough space at rehab.

I think Obama on the other hand stands a very good chance of winning the  
rimaries and Americans are angry enough at the republicans so that none of  
heir candidates stands a chance in the national elections, no matter who they  
re." Jabou.

ndeed Jabou. I agree with you. Obama does stand a very good chance of  
inning at least one of the primaries if not all. As far as the anger of  
mericans 
t Republicans, I presume you share that all the democratic candidates  stand 
qual chances when pitted against a Republican. We can all cherish that  but 
et us focus for now on the voting democrats for the democratic primaries.  
hat we are trying to discern is "EDwards, Obama, or Clinton, who represents the 
 most valuable and desirable change for Democratic Americans". After the  
rimaries, we will change our effort by removing the word democratic from our  
uery.

So a wonderful and winning strategy for Democrats this time would be an  
bama/Edwards ticket." Jabou.

hat wouldn't be a bad ticket either. If that ends up being the ticket it  
ould be formidable. It will be more formidable against the Republicans in all  
f America if it turns out to be Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton, 
dwards-Obama,  or Edwards-Gore. What do you think????

Together, they can restore the hopes of the people and make great  headway 
owards reversing  the damage that the last 8 years of a Bush  Administration 
as done" Jabou.

nything is a refreshing change from the last 8 years of  cluelessness.

Thanks for providing the link to Ousman's blog, I had not known of it  
efore. As for Andrew Young Ousman, he dances to the music of corporate America  
and so he has to pay the piper so no surprises there. He has now made a career  
f leading the pillagers and plunderers into Africa. Dr King is no doubt 
urning  in his grave." Jabou.

his is not fair. I have contributed in forming a comprehensive alliance  
gainst my person and Edwards' person. This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. The  
wo of you simply are too overwhelming even if I summon the entire essence of my 
 very being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not to gang up 
against me and Edwards.
"Jabou" 

hat Friggin-ever. You mean Jabou and Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New  
ambians!!

aruna.


----Original Message-----
rom: Haruna Darbo  
o: [log in to unmask]
ent: Thu, 13  Dec 2007 11:26 pm
ubject: Re: John Edwards/  Haruna





Jabou, you know you are  beautiful. I can never get upset at you.
I think you like both John  Edwards and Obama, but that you like Obama more  
ecause his election  will represent much needed change.
Would you consider that the election  of John Edwards will also represent  
hange?
The work therefore  is in discerning between John Edwards and Obama, who is  
he more  desirable change!!!
Now, like you about John Edwards, I like Obama a lot  because I think he is  
rilliant, popular, and his election will give  hope to a lot of Immigrant  
mericans.
John Edwards not only  represents hope for more Americans than Obama, he has  
hown the value  of the change that he may accrue us. I have not had the  
pportunity to  witness a sampling of Obama's change except that he looks  
ifferent  
rom past presidents.
John Edwards' One America Foundation offers  some hope.
ohn Edwards' rebuilding efforts in the Lower Ninth ward offer  hope in what  
merica can be.
ohn Edwards fought with Huge  corporate outfits on the behalf of regular  
nd 
ommon Americans, and  John Edwards and Obama are both lawyers.
enator John Edwards of North  carolina will get dirty for you and with  you.
orth Carolina used to be  the home of Senator Jesse Helms.
ohn Edwards enjoys enormous peer support  and the most endorsements from  
emocratic governors of states than  either Obama or Clinton.
ohn Edwards is more electable across the United  states than any candidate  
urrently seeking the presidency, Republican  or Democrat. Check the stats.
ibby Edwards is beautiful and is not beholden  to corporate America. Mrs.  
bama is beautiful but may be beholden to  corporate America. She sits on the 

oard of Walmart.
ohn Edwards  is handsome and is not given to religious distinctions nor  
oes 
e  believe religion ought to be mixed with governance. John Edwards  
elieves  
n Religion as moral and ethical compass, not administrative   compass.
Obama is good. John Edwards is more valuable to all America.  Edwards-Obama  
ay be formidable. What do you think my dear? Lemme  know, Lemme know!! You 
now 
usman is an Obama-head!!! Don't  you??
Your friend and colleague Haruna. 
In a message dated  12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask]  writes:
Haruna,
I both like and have a great deal of respect for  John  Edwards and his wife 
lizabeth for many reasons, some of which  are mentioned  below.  However, I 
m 
n Obama supporter  myself.  I also think Obama  has a better chance  of 
eing  
lected because among other things,   he is seen as the "change"  candidate 
y 
 country that desperately needs  change and Hillary ain't  it.  Infact, I 
hink Hillary has turned into a  "snake oil sales  lady" and she is 
verything to 
everyone in her zeal to be   president and I do not trust her at all and the 
est of the country is   beginning to see through her. I think that Edwards' 
est 
shot will be as  a V.P  for Obama.  I think together they would make an 
wesome  
eam.
ow,  now, don't get too   upset.
abou




----Original   Message-----
rom: Haruna Darbo 
o:   [log in to unmask]
ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 6:49 pm
ubject:  I  wish to share John Edwards with   you:





e just concluded another   conference call with David Medina, the national  
ampaign  director  for John Edwards.
We are excited about the prospects for a  John Edwards  Presidency. We are  
leased to have the support of  Harry Belafonte  and Danny Glover in South  
arolina. Our  gratitude to the United  Steel workers Union, The Mine Workers 
 
nion, 
he Carpenters  Union, and Friends of the Earth Action  Network. I am proud  
f 
ohn  Edwards' performance in the just  concluded democratic candidate debate 

sponsored by the Des Moines  Register. John Edwards is humble, intelligent,  
nd  
tands up  for the Common American even on unpopular issues. He  has vision  
nd  
haracter, attributes that are extremely valuable to   American foreign  
olicy 
nd stature in the world.
We  would  like volunteers to assist in South Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, and  
ew  
Hampshire. We also wish to ask for your financial support if  your time  will 
ot  allow volunteering. Please visit us at   _http://www.johnedwards.com_ 
http://www.johnedwards.com)  and  thank  you  for your support and company 
oward 
   
ne-America.
Haruna.



*************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web 
nterface
t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


ttp://gambian.blogspot.com

      
--------------------------------
ooking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web 
nterface
t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2