Joe,
Cool down your temper! Let us hear what UDP has to
say first. Your words are very sharp and they may even
make it hard for any possible future reconciliation.
thanks,
Madi
--- Joe Sambou <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just as NADD made history against the APRC, they
> will also make history with
> or without the UDP. The national interest of
> Gambians reigns supreme over
> that of any individual or group, including, but not
> limited to the UDP.
> Gambians forked out their hard earned cash and
> sponsored the UDP candidates
> for the sake of the national interest, not to
> mention the countless man
> hours that they expensed. Now, all I hear is we are
> the biggest; are born
> to rule; are the opposition, etc. I wonder what
> they are thinking? For
> anyone to think that they can come to battle harden
> Gambians to peddle such
> garbage and get away with it, they must be out of
> their fruggin minds.
> Folks, in the next weeks to come when we know the
> description of this ghost,
> then Gambians will exorcise it/them. The picture is
> taking shape slowly but
> surely. NADD is here to stay with or without the
> UDP. Gambians are behind
> NADD not some freaks that think that they owned the
> country.
>
> I had said that we wait to hear from NADD before we
> make comments. However,
> after being reliably informed that the charlatans
> that were here peddling
> spin on behalf of the UDP, and now no where to be
> found, have confirmed that
> Ousainou/UDP has tendered their resignation from
> NADD, all bets are off.
> Folks, we ought to recognize the selfish interests
> amongst us and call them
> out. If one comes here to defend the UDP against
> the false alarm that OJ
> was selected flagbearer, I expect that same person
> to come out here and tell
> us that their allegiance has severed ties from NADD.
> To not do that
> confirms that these folks care less what happens in
> Gambia as long as they
> got theirs. How narrow minded and selfish? No
> amount of spinning is going
> to get them out of this scam they trying to pull.
> Folks, the UDP has waged
> war against Gambians and Gambians are going to meet
> them half way. You
> owned Gambia? We shall see about that. You are the
> dominant party over
> NADD? We shall see about that. We have a murderer
> to get rid of, and these
> power thirsty crop want to relegate Gambian
> aspirations to their craziness
> of a leadership birth right. Over our dead bodies.
>
> Chi Jaama
>
> Joe
>
>
> >From: Kebba Dibba <[log in to unmask]>
> >Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing
> list
> ><[log in to unmask]>
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: The National Alliance for Democracy and
> Development (Nadd)
> >reportedly broke up
> >Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:47:06 +0000
> >
> > Split! Written by DO
> >
> > Friday, 03 February 2006
> >
> > The National Alliance for Democracy and
> Development (Nadd)
> >reportedly broke up on Wednesday with the pulling
> out of the United
> >Democratic Party (UDP) - the largest component
> party in the alliance.
> > According to sources, the rupture occurred after
> Nadd’s high profile
> >meeting on Wednesday when it was expected to
> finally select a leader.
> >Sources further indicated that after weeks of
> internal wrangling over the
> >selection of a standard-bearer for the party, the
> largest opposition party
> >felt belittled and disappointed over the rejection
> of its leader, Ousainou
> >Darboe in his bid to be Nadd standard-bearer.
> Insiders at Nadd said UDP had
> >always argued that its leader should be given the
> chance to contest under
> >the Nadd, given the fact that he heads the largest
> opposition party in the
> >country. “Wednesday was the final meeting for Nadd
> over the selection of a
> >standard-bearer. We decided that we will either
> have our leader, Lawyer
> >Darboe taken as standard-bearer or we say bye to
> them. Nadd is Nadd because
> >of UDP and without UDP, there is no Nadd. I know
> they will deny this fact
> >but the prove of the pudding is in the eating. Let
> them go on their own and
> >we go on our own. Can we accept
> > people who do not even have parties per se to
> lead us? This is
> >ridiculous. We better allow President Jammeh to win
> the election than allow
> >an election of joke where foolish and greedy
> politicians will use us to
> >achieve their selfish needs. Let it all end and in
> fact, we hope to join
> >hands with a party that is stronger and more
> serious than those other
> >parties that do not even have agendas,” a senior
> member of the UDP told
> >this paper yesterday.
> >
> > According to our source, Nadd’s numerous
> meetings were nothing but
> >gatherings of hypocrisy, as there was a certain
> party that wanted its
> >member to lead when it did not even have another
> party to second his
> >nomination. He said even though that particular
> party failed in their bid
> >to get their nomination seconded and for that
> matter, the nominee had to
> >withdraw under the grounds that he was not
> seconded, they could not still
> >say which other candidate they wanted to support.
> “They remained neutral
> >and silent. This shows you the type of double
> standard and hypocrisy they
> >play. It also shows you that they don’t have
> confidence in any other party
> >or people but themselves. If that is the case then
> let them be on their
> >own,” he said. Sources have also hinted to the
> Daily Observer that two
> >camps had emerged in the coalition. The UDP is
> reported to have been
> >supported by NRP while the PPP goes with Ndam. “But
> one interesting thing
> >is that there is no only a split in Nadd but there
> seems to
> > be another one in NRP because one of the NRP
> representatives in the
> >executive committee gave his backing to Ousainou
> Darboe (of UDP) while the
> >other gave his own to Omar Jallow (of PPP). So the
> whole thing is mixed up.
> >In fact, the meetings had been marred by bitter
> quarrels and arguments
> >about who should lead. “One thing that is important
> to make clear is that
> >UDP did not even make any nomination, but because
> of our majority, we only
> >presented our leader as the Nadd flag-bearer which
> the others refused to
> >pay heed to,” the top UDP man added.
> >
> > Until the time of going to press, the UDP had
> not officially announced
> >their withdrawal from Nadd, but it has been
> confirmed that, yesterday, they
> >had had series of meetings with their members
> country-wide, at their bureau
> >in Banjul with regard to the situation and stance
> of their party. It has
> >not also been confirmed whether the NRP has pulled
> away from Nadd with UDP
> >or not. Some UDP supporters who spoke top the Daily
> Observer yesterday were
> >casting venom on the other members of Nadd
> describing them as being
> >ungenuine and unserious. Similarly, the other side
> of Nadd has also
> >described UDP as a power-hungry group that does not
> have the interest of
> >the country at heart.
> >
> > Reacting to the development, Fatoumatta
> Jahumpa-Ceesay, a nominated
> >member of the National Assembly and top member of
> the APRC, said: “This is
> >not a surprise to me. I have always predicted that
> Nadd would fall like
> >carded wool because they were just a marriage of
> convenience comprising of
> >people with different ideologies. How do you think
> they can succeeded. In
> >fact, the amount of hatred and in-fight they have
> within themselves is more
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|
