Hi Saul!
                To start with if I may also borrow from the great Hamjatta,
what is more cobblers than what you have written? What is more cobblers than
putting up endless macho shows and pretending to have the only solution to
everything posted on this list?  When did you become an expert on how to be
"very Buharry"? You wouldn't even know Buharry if he were sitting next to
you. In fact most of what you wrote is so cobblers that I will not waste my
time trying to address it.
     Were you the only one talking about responding with force if the UDP is
attacked? Why did you feel singled out enough to warrant your responding
that you were not talking about a vigilante group? If you were not talking
about a vigilante group, why didn't you come out and say what you meant? Do
you think people are psychic enough to know what you are talking about? At
least you came out to say that you meant an UNARMED contingent. How would
they be able to defend themselves against heavily armed security personnel?
Isn't that still a recipe for disaster?
     If the scenario you described as being at war is to be taken seriously
tell me which country is not at war. Yes, you can tell me that if war breaks
out you'll leave Washington to go and fight. My question to you then now
that you have stated by your own admission that The Gambia is at war, what
are you doing in Washington? Why aren't you in The Gambia fighting? Putting
up a show or just presenting cobblers? Anyway, other people have raised
issues in a manner more befitting of my response than yours. Have a good
day.

Buharry.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------