GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:18:11 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (844 lines)
Foroyaa Newspaper Burning Issue
Issue No. 112/2007, 24 – 25 September  2007

Editorial
Peace Building
A Must for All Societies
The  one-day international celebration highlighting the importance of peace 
in all  parts of the world is quite significant. War does not only devour 
lives, it  often destroys infrastructure and creates disaster, which undermines 
economic  development, generates social problems sometimes of catastrophic  
magnitude.
Human beings live in society and are therefore compelled to relate  to one 
another. Individuals relate to one another; groups of individuals relate  to one 
another within a given society and societies relate with one another.  Such 
relations can be one of cooperation or domination.
As society  metamorphosizes from one stage to another the masses, in their 
pursuit to  protect their common economic, political, social and cultural 
interest have  succeeded in imposing instruments in accordance with the demands of 
the times.  Such instruments which have defined the standard of practice for 
society, have  undergone numerous refinement as required by time and 
circumstances to make them  better serve the common interest.
Such an instrument may be a national  instrument called a constitution or an 
international instrument such as the UN  Charter or the UN Declaration on 
Human Rights.
Such legal instruments protect  the sovereignty and equality of nations and 
peoples; the fundamental rights of  individuals, etc. In short all forms of 
political, economic, social and cultural  rights which, if respected can go a 
long, long way in ensuring peace and  stability in the world. 
One group of individuals or society exploiting and  oppressing another and 
leaving them to languish in poverty and misery can only  serve as a source of 
conflict. It is part of peace building for political  leaders from all sides to 
respect and defend the sovereign will of the  people.They can follow the 
example of Ahmed Tijan Kabbah who did all he could to  ensure free and fair 
elections while relinquishing power. It is also part of  peace building for 
governments to ensure that human rights are promoted and  protected, good governance 
prevails and poverty  averted. 

Groundnut Pricing
By Bubacarr K. Sowe
The  Secretary of State for Agriculture, Kanja Sanneh has informed the 
National  Assembly that the Department of State for Agriculture is not responsible 
for the  pricing of groundnuts. Mr. Sanneh made this statement while replying 
to a  question posed by the National Assembly Member for Sami, Lamin Ceesay, 
who  wanted to know the price of groundnuts per metric tonne in the 2007/2008 
trade  season. “The pegging of the producer price for groundnuts is not the  
responsibility of my Department of State,” Mr. Sanneh responded.
Asked by the  Member for Niamina East, Foday Jallow, what plans are afoot to 
avoid a  repetition of the past situation in the groundnut trade sub-sector, 
the  Secretary of State referred the member to his previous answer.
The Member for  Wuli West, Sidia Jatta, asked the SoS what plans are in place 
to get farmers  paid whose cotton produce was bought on credit by buying 
agents. Mr. Sanneh  responded that the marketing of cotton is not the 
responsibility of his  Department of State, but The Gambia Divestiture Agency.
Mr. Jatta enquired  how much cotton was produced last season and how much 
money was owed to the  cotton farmers, the SoS said, “I kindly refer the 
Honourable Member to my answer  to the last question”.

WANEP Celebrates World Peace Day
By  Isatou Bittaye
The West Africa Network for Peace Building (WANEP) The Gambia  has organised 
a forum to commemorate International World Peace Day on Friday  September 21 
at the Paradise Suites Hotel. Speaking at the forum, Pamela Cole,  Coordinator 
of WANEP said the International World Peace Day is a day set by the  United 
Nations to be celebrated yearly and that the day will serve as  remembrance for 
the people and organisations that peace needs to be observed.  She said there 
can never be development without peace and the Gambia has joined  the World in 
celebrating the day in peace. Madam Cole noted that the day would  also serve 
as a remembrance of millions of people trapped in the World such as  
refugees; children sold and raped victims among others. She said there has been  a 
decline in every form of violence in the World except terrorism. On the  
requirements of Peace, She noted that peace has different meanings, which  include the 
absence of poverty, violence and respect for human rights. Madam  Cole added 
that peace requires not only the absence of violence but also the  presence of 
justice. She however challenged everyone to take steps in the  struggle for 
peace building and maintenance, noting that that is the battle,  which requires 
fighting daily. 
Also speaking, Mr. Ousman Yabo of TANGO said  peace is a noble word but 
cannot be present with too much inequalities,  political and religious intolerance, 
poverty and disease. Mr. Yabo added that  unless all these problems are 
tackled peace couldn’t prevail. He said that it is  high time for the leaders to 
recognise and practice good governance and be  tolerant to the people. He 
indicated that there is also unfair distribution of  wealth in the World, which also 
serves as a threat to peace.
Deputising for  the speaker of the National Assembly, Hon Netty Baldeh said 
the National  Assembly is committed in ensuring peace. Mr. Baldeh was talking 
on ‘the role of  the National Assembly in expanding peace and people’s freedom.
’ He noted that  democracy is the only system that provides for peace and in 
the absence of  democracy there cannot be representatives and a responsible 
National Assembly.  The NAM said peace is the foundation of human development, 
in a stable and  secured environment where social justice, women’s emancipation 
and child rights,  among others, exist. Mr. Baldeh emphasized that on certain 
occasions he had to  vote against government when his conscience dictates 
that the interest of the  public is not being served. He also noted that peace 
had to be shown with  commitment and that peace must be solved with diligence 
and diligence goes with  tolerance.
Investing in Peace is Cheaper
Professor Nicodemus Awasom, Chair  of Exams and Education at the University 
of The Gambia speaking on the topic  “citizens and peace building” said peace 
is a priceless commodity and the Gambia  is exceptional because it is an 
Island of peace. Professor Awasom noted that  many don’t appreciate peace until it 
eludes them. He said investing in peace  building is cheaper than ending war. 
Professor Awasom added that the civil  society has an important role in 
maintaining peace, noting that the government  is just a partner in peace building. 
He said that the family, religious bodies  and organisations also have a 
crucial role in peace building and that in  maintaining peace, all hands must be on 
deck. 
Mrs. Hannah Foster, Director  of the African Center for Democracy and Human 
rights, said no peace is without  human right, justice and participation. She 
indicated that peace is a right and  duty, which should involve the advancement 
of women and men, and the ability to  break the psychotic form of violence. 
Mrs. Foster noted that if you want peace  you should not talk to your friends 
about it but rather those who you termed as  enemies and she called for the 
reduction of arms and bombs. 
Deputising for  Halifa Sallah, Mr. Ousman Sillah, spoke on the topic “Is 
peace and security ever  possible in the world in the face of the war on Terror, 
widespread global  corruption and poor governance which continue to pose new 
forms of violence and  insecurity: what challenges and prospects are there for 
peace building in the  New Millennium?.” In sharing his perspective, Mr. Sillah 
said  if the war  on terror is being waged against religious bigotry and 
fundamentalism then it  should be supported by all those who cherish freedom and 
peace. He said the war  on terror that we see today is being waged by certain 
powers who want to impose  their will on others; that they do not represent the 
interest of the majority of  the people of the world but that of a few. He 
postulated that the discussion of  peace is a question of life, suffering and 
death. Mr. Sillah said that peace  cannot be attained by mere prayers or 
incantation; that peace is something that  is built and worked for; that peace is 
normative and cannot be realized without  justice; that justice prevails when 
rights are being respected for people to  live a dignified life. Mr. Sillah said 
that it is good governance and democracy  that engenders peace. He said peace 
cannot be imposed and that peace is also not  the absence of physical 
violence; that psychological violence (stress), the  restlessness of young people to 
emigrate, domestic violence, poverty,  hopelessness, unemployment, job 
insecurity all contribute in creating an  unpeaceful environment. On the need for 
peace, Mr. Sillah said peace is the  creation of a space that enable human beings 
the ability and latitude to realize  their fullest potentials and a fulfilled 
life. He concluded that all is not  gloom and hopelessness; that these are all 
man-made problems and are challenges  that we can overcome with 
determination; that with good governance, democracy  and due process in place and with the 
awareness and struggle for rights, peace  will prevail.
Other speakers included Lt. Col. Masaneh Kinteh, GNA Commander,  Mr. Alieu 
Darboe of Action Aid International The Gambia and Mr. Fabakary Kalleh  of Youth 
Ambassadors of Peace. Students of Marina High and Primary Schools sang  songs 
and read poems on peace. Young people also made drama performances from  YIDAC 
and the Nova-Scotia Gambia Association depicting peace and the daily  
happenings in life.

Rural Electrification!
Mansakonko, Others  Without Electricity
By Yaya Dampha
Information reaching Foroyaa has it  that the Rural Electrification project 
is not working as expected by the people  in the Lower River Region. 
This reporter examined the situation on the  ground and discovered that in 
Lower River Region, before the coming of the Rural  Electrification Project 
(REP), there used to be electricity supply in the  following communities: Soma, 
Karantaba, Sankwia, Kani-kunda, Mansakonko and  Pakalinding. However, according 
to the source, with the advent of REP the supply  is only limited to Soma and 
Pakalinding and three street lights in Toniataba;  that Karantaba, Sankwia, 
Kanikunda and the administrative headquarters,  Mansakonko, are all without 
electricity; that this has increased discomfort in  these communities.
According to NAWEC officials in the area, the REP has only  constructed one 
exchange station in Pakalinding and their supplies are coming  from the 
powerhouse built at Farafenni in the North Bank Region. The officials  further told 
this reporter that after the commissioning of the project, they  realised that 
anytime they supplied Jarra, the power went off. They said up to  the time of 
the interview, they could only supply two villages in Jarra and  these were 
Soma and Pakalinding.

Today is D-Day for Tabara  Samba
By Fabakary B. Ceesay
The well publicized murder trial between the  state and Madam Tabara Samba is 
set to end today, Monday, 24 September. The  trial Magistrate Pa Harry 
Jammeh, is ready to deliver judgment on the matter at  the Kanifing Magistrates’ 
Court.
Madam Tabara Samba is standing trial for  killing her husband, Mr. Ebrima 
Nyan, at Old Jeshwang, sometime in March this  year. Madam Samba was alleged to 
have poured hot oil on her husband while he was  sleeping in bed which led to 
his untimely death. At the beginning of the trial  her first counsel withdrew 
from the case due to personal reasons. After this the  trial did not proceed 
due to the lack of legal representation for her. At the  latter part two 
humanitarian female lawyers, Mrs. Amie Joof Conteh and Ms. Lubna  Farrage, 
volunteered to represent her without cost. They called for either a  fresh trial or to 
re-cross examine the witnesses who had testified in the trial.  The trial 
Magistrate decided to recall the witnesses to be cross examined again.  By the end 
the trial the prosecution called ten (10) witnesses while the defence  called 
two (2) witnesses including the accused herself. The prosecution has  
addressed the court orally on the matter, while the defence filed a written  address 
to the court. Today, Monday, 24 September, Magistrate Jammeh will decide  the 
fate of Madam Tabara Samba based on the evidence adduced from both sides and  
the law.

NIA Diamond Case
Defence Raises Concern Over  Delay
By Fabakary B. Ceesay 
The long dragging criminal case between the  state and six ex-officers of the 
National Intelligence Agency (NIA) did not  proceed in full swing at the 
Kanifing Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday 19  September. The matter was before 
Principal Magistrate Moses Richards. The state  counsel A.S Umar applied to tender 
the cautionary and voluntary statements of  all the six accused persons. The 
application was granted and the statements were  tendered as exhibits. Mr. 
Umar also applied for an adjournment due to the  absence of his witness. He also 
said he wanted to review all the documents  pertaining to the case in order to 
avert further delay in the trial. 
The  defence counsel, Mr. Lamin Jobarteh did not object to the state counsel’
s  application but raised concerns about the case. Mr. Jobarteh said the 
matter is  a criminal case and  their liberty has been at stake for almost three 
(3)  years now. He urged the prosecution to speed up with their case.  The  
matter is adjourned till October.
The six ex-NIA officers are standing trial  for allegedly robbing two German 
Nationals of their properties, including  206,000 US dollars, 8 pieces of raw 
diamond, two cell phones and a shaving  machine.

MARRIAGE AND FAMILY
BLACKMAIL, JUSTICE AND  SENTIMENT
By Amie Sillah
Part 5
A Dream Comes True
Greg and Daado  became married. It was a simple classic marriage. The Duo 
wanted it that way.  They are two of a kind. Greg is rich but very modest, 
likewise Daado. Friends,  relatives and loved ones attended the ceremony. There was 
enough to eat and  drink, merriment and fulfillment on both sides. Greg and 
Daado loved  themselves.
The Reception
The ‘devil’ appeared at the reception party  uninvited. He spoiled Daado’s 
happy day. He harassed, tormented, threatened and  blackmailed her. Justin 
waited until Daado was alone. He dragged her aside and  said. “I want to see you 
tomorrow at the Sun lodge at 6pm sharp. If you fail,  you know what I can do. I 
have the videotape of our escapade and also your  pregnancy report. See the 
son of the devil tomorrow”. He tried to kiss Daado but  she turned her face 
away. Greg appeared. He came to look for his wife. “Where is  my beautiful wife? 
My friends and relatives are asking for you”. He held her  hand. Justin 
greeted him with respect and said. “Congratulations Mr. Greg! You  are very lucky to 
win the coveted prize”. Greg shook his head and said. “Thank  you Doctor! 
You are welcome”. He went away with his wife. Daado frowned at  Justin. Greg 
introduced Daado to his guests. “She is beautiful, graceful!” They  all 
exclaimed. Justin trailed behind the couple. He sneered at Daado when people  are less 
attentive. He stayed to the end and threateningly stared at Daado. She  was 
shaky but pretended to be normal.
The Appointment
Daado fulfilled her  appointment after a fortnight. She came a bit late and 
Justin complained. “Why  are you late? You kept me waiting for an hour. I am 
businessman and time means  money. I can’t play with time!” Daado protested. “
Why Justin? Why? Why are you  tormenting me? You know I am newly married. You 
betrayed our friendship, my  trust in you. What else do you want from me? Why 
are you blackmailing me? I am  not supposed to be here. You know it!” “Sit 
down please!” Justin said. Daado  refused to sit down. “I am not sitting down. 
Say what you have to say and let me  go!” “Okay! Please yourself madam. My 
request is one million Dalasi and I keep  my big mouth shut. I have records of 
the pregnancy and the miscarriage”. Justin  showed her the records. “I have 
copied a sizeable number of them. I can show  them to your husband and his family 
if you don’t cooperate”. Daado was shocked  and afraid. Justin threw the 
papers at her. She became outrageous. “You are a  bastard! A public dog! Where 
can I get that kind of money? Daado asked. “From  him Ofcourse! If he can pay 
half a million to see your pretty face he can surely  pay one million to save 
your pretty ass. You have to appreciate. I am being very  considerate here”. “
Have you gone bankrupt doctor?” The devil gave a devilish  laughter and said. “
My family has a Multi-Million estate. I am a businessman. I  do business. 
This is business girlie! This is business!” “You are insane!” Daado  exclaimed. 
Justin laughed at her. Daado asked for time to get the money. “Yes!  Take your 
time to raise the money. I give you two weeks to do just that. Don’t  do 
anything stupid. I am ready for you. I am Doctor Justin. I am mean and  dangerous. 
I can go to any length to get what I want. Don’t play with me!” He  
threatened Daado. He tried to kiss her but Daado turned her face away. She is  now in 
deep shit, as the Americans would say.
At Home
Daado became  withdrawn, timid and nervous. Greg noticed it. Who wouldn’t? He 
loved her and  wanted to make her happy all the time. Greg asked Daado 
whether she was okay. “I  am alright”. Daado lied. “No! You are not. You are 
worried, something is eating  you up. What is it my sweetheart? Since we got married 
you are not yourself. Are  you hiding something from me?” “No! I am not”.  
Daado then shed tears. Greg  became more concern. “But you are shedding tears?”
 Daado lied again “I am  shedding tears of joy. I never thought I’ll marry 
the most eligible bachelor in  town, the famous and mega rich Greg Johnson!” 
Greg embraced her and entered the  house. He was not convinced. “Daado is hiding 
something from me. She is kind of  timid and scared. Perturbed and restless, 
something is eating up my baby. Sooner  or later I’ll find out”. He 
soliloqued “Don’t carry your worries and pain to  yourself. Marriage is sharing of Joy 
and pain, for better or for worse; in  health or sickness till death do us 
part. Daado! Even if death parts us  physically it will not part us in spirit”. 
Greg embraced and reassured Daado. “I  am overjoyed!” Daado lied to Greg.
At The Office
At the office Daado asked  the Financial Manager to transfer one million to 
her account. Mr. Jobe asked  whether Greg was aware of it. Daado lied. “Yes he 
is aware. I am into precious  stones business”. She explained.
Another Appointment
They met at the  rendez vous. Justin mimicked, mocked and geared at Daado. “
Madam Greg! Have you  brought the money?” Daado threw the bag at him. “Here is 
one million! Take the  buck and leave me alone for God’s sake. I regret 
knowing you and to have  anything to do with you! You are wicked Justin! You are 
evil!” She was almost in  tears. Justin took the money and gave her the escapade 
cassette. He put his hand  at her shoulder. Daado took it off. “Watch the 
film Madam. Exclusively, all  alone”. “Son of a bitch! Bastard! God will punish 
you!” Daado left. He provoked  her. “You cannot bluff me. I had you before 
your husband”. He mocked at  her.
Daado Watches 
The Escapade Film
Dado watched the horror film. How  Justin drugged and ravished her. She cried 
in shame. She blamed her naivety.  Greg knocked at the door. She panicked and 
put off the video cassette player.  Greg entered and enquired. “What are you 
watching?” He held the cassette jacket.  “It must be a nice film. Lets watch 
it. I want to join the fun”. Daado  hesitated. “Put it on! You don’t want me 
to see it?” “No! It is not that”. “Then  put it on!” Greg ordered.

FOCUS ON POLITICS
THE 1987 GENERAL  ELECTIONS
RULING PARTY RESORTS TO RELIGION AS ELECTION DRAWS NEAR
With  Suwaibou Touray
We have been focusing on politics in this column and this  motivates us to 
narrate the history of The Gambia from pre-colonial to  Post-Independence epoch. 
We have since then followed the narration of events up  to 1987, which was an 
election year for both Presidential and House of  Representatives.
In the last issues we have narrated a debate as to whether  the elections 
(1987) would be free and fair. We stopped where we said Gambian  democracy was at 
this stage sort of dominated by an elitist view, which cast  doubt on the 
capacity of the people to critically participate in politics. Let  us continue 
from where we stopped.
Barely one week to go for the 1987  elections, the opposition parties that 
were allowed to utilize the national  radio were yet to do so. The PDOIS which 
was refused air time had to utilize  other options such as holding symposia so 
as to send their view across to the  populace.
On Saturday, January 30th, 1987, over one thousand people responded  to their 
invitation on a discussion on the SeneGambia Confederation at the  Gambia 
High School hall. The PDOIS also broke with tradition and invited both  the 
Senegalese and Gambian authorities to the debate as a mark of fair play.  They 
invited the then Attorney Generals of both The Gambia and Senegal.
The  theme of the discussion was the “Constitutionality of the SeneGambia  
Confederation”. The Attorney General of Senegal diplomatically honoured the  
invitation by sending a representative but the Gambian authorities did  not.
Mr. Sidia Jatta, the Chairman of PDOIS spoke first in both French and  then 
English. Mr. Jatta dwelt on the perspective of the SeneGambia  Confederation. 
According to the Nation, he attacked those engaged in false  historical notions 
that the peoples of the SeneGambia at one time shared the  same boundaries. 
He referred to an article in the “West Africa Magazine,” by one  Ousman 
Manjang who argued that different empires and kingdoms existed in the  West Africa 
region, which were all independent of each other. He gave an example  of Sine 
Saloum and stressed the fact that some people were trying to mislead the  
public for their political interest. Sidia insisted among other things that  there 
were many boundaries engulfing different kingdoms in the SeneGambia  region; 
that the area that we call the Gambia and Senegal was never a single  political 
entity before the arrival of the colonialists.
Halifa Sallah  also spoke at length and expressed his disappointment on the 
absence of the  ministers of Justice of both Gambia and Senegal. He cajoled 
that people who  believe in democracy should not be afraid to justify their 
actions, especially  when demanded by the people. He spoke at length on Gambia’s 
1970 constitution  and the OAU charter to justify that the confederation agreed 
to by Diouf and  Jawara was illegal.
According to the Nation Newspaper, Halifa argued among  other things that the 
President of The Gambia could never become the President  of the SeneGambia 
Confederation. He asserted that this has been confirmed by the  confederal 
constitution itself; that Senegal’s President shall be the President  of the 
confederation. Halifa brilliantly argued that in times of war, the  president of 
the confederation has all rights to control the movement of goods,  fuel etc in 
both countries.
According to the Nation, contributions from the  floor showed that Gambians 
were dissatisfied with the SeneGambia Confederation  and opined that it should 
be regarded as a genuine desire to replace it by a  system that is opposed to 
what these present advocates of the confederation were  propounding, which 
they said seemed suspicious. The Nation stated that the  applause in the hall in 
support of the PDOIS argument against the SeneGambia  Confederation was an 
indication of a demand for a review of the whole  affair.
At this stage, the ruling PPP simply shied away from the PDOIS  and its 
arguments. Many believed that the reason why Jawara excluded the PDOIS  from 
airtime over the radio was simply to avoid the embarrassment these  revelations were 
likely to make. Based on the reports in the ruling party organ,  the PPP 
appeared to be disturbed by the PDOIS style of campaign, which is based  on 
polemics (evidenced based campaign). It was at this stage that the Nation  said the 
PPP were being described as the Reaganites. The Nation teased that the  PPP 
does not want an opposition that would threaten or challenged their  position; 
that the PPP is simply banking on the hope that the populace does not  
comprehend the issues raised by the PDOIS.
According to the Nation, the PPP  was also accused of turning to religion in 
their campaign with the hope that it  might serve to soften resistance from 
those who opposed them. For example, the  PPP propagated the idea that it was 
God (Allah) who put Jawara there and all  those who opposed him opposed God as 
well. According to the papers, the PPP was  not really confident that their 
strategy of using the election machinery would  work this time around because of 
the clear information given to the masses; that  they therefore employed the 
other tactic of buying the voter’s cards of the poor  and unenlightened elector’
s who they suspect were not in support of them. The  Nation states that 
perhaps the payment of D100 for every voter’s card taken from  some voters might 
help them. The lesson to be derived from it, opined the Nation  is, “if you 
cannot convince others through debates or by facts, bribe  them”.
By February 25, the PPP, represented by Mr. Bakary B. Darboe, Mr.  I.B.A 
Kelepha Samba and Mr. Saihou Sabally utilized PPP’s airtime. Mr. B.B  Darboe who 
spoke first said among other things that there was little difference  between 
PPP, NCP and GPP whose leaders he said were members of the PPP. He urged  the 
people to vote for the PPP. Mr. Kelepha Samba, the newly elected chairman of  
the PPP at the time, spoke briefly on the history of the Gambia before  
independence in 1965. He then referred to the development brought about by the  PPP 
such as roads, buildings, hospitals and health centers, wells for rural  
peoples and so on and so forth. Mr. Saihou Sabally spoke last and reiterated  what 
Mr. Samba had said. This exhausted the airtime given to the PPP. 
On the  26 February 1987, the NCP, utilized the airtime and dwelt on the 
deteriorating  economic situation, which he opined was caused by a corrupt PPP 
Government. He  said the PPP government had misused the nation’s money. He 
vehemently denied  being a tribalist. Mr. Dibba argued that life under the NCP would 
not be hard  and difficult but vowed that those who embezzled the Nation’s 
funds would be  punished. He said the Commission for the Evaluation of Assets 
and Properties and  Prevention of corrupt practices would be resumed.
Mr. Jabel Sallah who stood  under UP/ NCP ticket in Banjul South spoke on the 
adverse effects of the ERP on  the economy. He said the president himself had 
admitted that the economic  situation had gone beyond repair. He then asked 
what had happened to the healthy  reserves in foreign Banks that the president 
spoke about. He urged the people  and asked, why not give NCP a chance for a 
better future for all of us?
For  the GPP, Mr. Assan Musa Camara said discipline should apply to all 
levels of  endeavor. He said there should be prompt action and a total commitment 
to  service; that there was a complete collapse of the socio-economic fabric of 
our  society, which he said, was deplorable. The GPP leader said GPP would  
re-negotiate the country’s stand-by credit with the IMF and the structural  
adjustment credit with the World Bank to ensure  that:
a)         The socio-economic  and the welfare costs of the present 
adjustment measures were equitably  distributed, bearing in mind the interest of the 
common  man.
b)         The Gambia’s debt is  paid in accordance with the economy; debt 
servicing capacity adjusted for the  structural constraints represented by the 
inequitable nature of international  trade between the Gambia and its trading  
partners.
c)         Income of  Gambians be adjusted to a level that restores their 
purchasing power, through  planned employment without aggravating the cost pushed 
by inflation that has so  drastically depleted the value of the Dalasi  
d)         That women are involved  in all development programmes in both 
planning and implementation stages, and  said they should have equal access to 
education and subsistence and production  where necessary.
Mr. Camara finally denied engaging in tribal campaign .He  accused the PPP of 
trying to force people to vote for them. He finally expressed  confidence in 
the GPP.
See next issue as we analyze the 1987 election results  and other matters.

FEATURE
“Painful Good-Bye to Home: Governance  Failures as a Precipitant to 
Emigration from Africa”

Well researched scholarly works that show useful insights into the myriad  of 
challenges that confront our societies are abound but only accessible to a  
privileged few. These are seminal materials that invariably found themselves  
lying on the shelves of the less accessed college, university or public  
libraries and with their pages only waiting to be leafed through and dusted off  by 
a relatively limited number of students and academics engaged in research in  
varied fields of study. Both the wealth of information contained in these  
materials and the outcome of these educational research again follow the same  
pattern or cycle of becoming knowledge destined for these libraries and being  
sought after by the same limited number of students and academics. Some of 
these  works are printed in paperback and sold as books that are again affordable 
to  only a few in countries where the culture of reading and critical 
mindedness are  yet to take a firm root among its literate and non-literate 
population,  alike.
How do we ‘remove’ such valuable materials from within the four walls  of 
these educational fortresses and share the contents with the non-academic or  
non-scholarly readers becomes a matter of concern. This is the one consideration 
 that compels me to search for materials with empirical ideas regarding 
societal  issues that can generate public discourse that contribute toward raising  
awareness  inorder to make a difference.   
By courtesy of the  COUNCIL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH IN 
AFRICA (CODESRIA),  headquartered in Dakar, Senegal, I am publishing the full 
text of an article in  the CODESRIA Bulletin, authored by Cage Banseka, which 
thoroughly deals with the  emigration phenomenon involving the young people 
in our countries in its  relation with the issue of governance. I am, 
therefore, indebted to CODESRIA for  this generosity. I was able to have access to this 
material through Mr. Ebrima  Sall, of Gambian nationality, who is the head of 
the Research Department and  with the kind permission of Mr. Nyamjoh, 
Director of Publication.
This is not  intended to be an academic exercise, but rather to help generate 
or open up  debate to discuss the pressing issues and challenges that 
confront young people,  in particular, and our society, in general. 
This particular article deals  with the so-called “Barcelona mba Barsakh” 
syndrome, meaning the choices of  either emigrating to ‘Barcelona or Death’, 
which young people who are determined  to change  their lot for the better often 
give themselves.
Immediately  after the publication of this article, I would want to share 
with the readers  the full narration of the experience of a young Gambian 
returnee who ventured to  brave the open seas, with all its attendant dangers, in 
search of greener  pastures.
Ousman Sillah

Cage Banseka
African Union  Mission
Khartoum, Sudan
What African countries have lacked during most of  their history as 
independent states are leaders who are unifiers, chiefs in the  true sense, who bind 
wounds, hold everything and everyone together, mobilise and  motivate their 
people, pursue a policy of inclusion rather than exclusion and  are seen by one 
and all to be of the highest integrity and beyond suspicion.–  Adedeji Adebayo 
(1999: 41).  
A few years into the celebrated  twenty-first century many Africans are 
unrelentingly choosing to escape from  their countries and questions are still 
being asked about the capability of  African states to become involved in an 
effective management of resources, to  put in place an appropriate design of policy 
and an efficient discharge of  functions, all designed at answering to basic 
human needs. Can African states  exhibit a predictable, open and enlightened 
policy making a state system that is  imbued with a professional ethos acting 
in furtherance of the public good? Can  Africans rely on their governments to 
provide them reasoned freedom and the  ability to pursue an integrated process 
of personal self-development in a bid to  acquire the things they have the 
right to treasure at home?
These questions  might sound like another definitional stigmatisation of 
African  politics.
However, many young people now seem to be of the conviction that  development 
in their countries is no longer concerned with enhancing their lives  and the 
freedom they wish to enjoy. They want to live lives that are richer and  
unfettered, which allow them to be fuller social beings, and to interact with  and 
influence the affairs of their countries. They do not want to spend time  
fighting for survival, and sporadically succumbing to substantive restrictions  
to self-development. This is seen as the precipitant of emigration to the West. 
 
The emigration phenomenon is apparently linked to the nature of the states  
in Africa, their economic, political, and social situations. If the economic 
and  political realities back home were different, would these people choose  
emigration? Many contrary views are held on these questions. However, the  
reasons to prefer to face the unknown, to brave the life threatening journeys  
through the high seas and estrangement at their destination seem very  compelling, 
and commentators can easily make recourse to the economic and  political 
malaise back in the African continent, personal ambition and human  folly 
notwithstanding. 
This article examines the balance of present evidence  that seems to suggest 
weakness and failure on the part of the states in Africa  as a precipitant to 
the massive departures. We question why states allow people  to leave for 
refuge abroad, where they tend to tell odious stories, true or  imagined, that 
further betray and expose African states to international  ridicule. Our 
discussion focuses more on prevailing mores and norms in African  governance, and the 
generational fallout that might have led to massive and  unrelenting 
emigration despite the dangers and frustrations involved.
Does  bad governance precipitate emigration?
Many years after independence some  Africans are still waiting for their 
leaders to reshape their venerable  societies, eliminate the old parochial 
fissures and replace them with nations  that prioritise general welfare. Young people 
are still waiting for their states  to steer the way to unprecedented levels 
of prosperity and to new heights of  human development and dignity through a 
series of both macro-level and  micro-level social and economic policies. The 
strong feeling among these people  that states would somehow achieve for them 
all the good trappings of a  progressive economic, social and political welfare 
cannot simply be  dampened.  
Governance and politics in some countries of Africa are  still largely 
concerned with the questions of how to survive (who gets what,  when and how?) than 
how to manage the affairs of the state in a way that  benefits the entire 
citizenry. The few answers that have been suggested by the  politics of the 
continent to these questions have seemed deeply unsatisfactory,  especially for 
those who are at the receiving end of politics, and who  eventually develop the 
feeling that they have no other alternative than to move  to the West. They 
leave behind them countries typified by stagnation and social  decay, dilapidated 
infrastructure, run-down housing, poor agricultural  production and declining 
life expectancies. 
Save for a few countries, the  leaders seem to be doing little or nothing to 
restructure the distorted and  disarticulated, dependent and underdeveloped 
structures of the sub-continent’s  social formations. Only little is being done 
to empower the people, to  strengthen and reconstitute national allegiance to 
the state, and to challenge  the cultural bastardisation to which 
globalisation is subjecting the continent.  Many leaders still keep confusing the 
establishment of violent structures with  the strengthening of the state. They often 
confuse the harassment of the  opposition elements, the asphyxiation of civil 
society, political thuggery and  criminal looting of the country’s resources, 
with power. Put shortly, some  opportunistic, decadent, irresponsible, largely 
unproductive, shamelessly  corrupt and ideologically barren class of 
individuals run some African states,  and mortgage the futures of young people. 
African students who gain a  valuable education in Western institutions no 
longer seek to return to serve  their own countries, and if they do then they 
are a  rare phenomenon. Upon  arrival in the West many embark on the search for 
naturalisation or other means  to stay permanently in their host countries. In 
many cases they abandon their  educational pursuits. Naturalisation for them 
is already an achievement of its  own. It is an assurance of security that 
their home countries have failed to  give them. Through this process Africa’s 
brains are being drained while   leaders stand by idly and watch. 
Generations of young people are growing in  countries whose landscape is 
dotted with unfinished projects, crumbling  infrastructure, unhelpful bureaucracy, 
capricious government policies, large  scale mismanagement, waste and 
political adventurism and the manipulation of  political power. An accentuating 
number of funerals accruing from the HIV  infection have equally inspired awe and 
put many n chagrin. All these have  somewhat subverted the possibilities for 
stability, peace and development, thus  making any African youth see their 
states as typical examples of blown  opportunities, distorted dreams, an 
illustration of he chaos theory, and typical  examples of gangster politics (Akeya 1997: 
346).
Many feel that some  governments in the continent attempt to impose a 
framework of order with a  greater propensity for breakdown than for survival. Many 
states have become  fragile, and in many instances, prove quite unable to 
tackle the conflicts which  arise within or among them. Sometimes the state, as in 
the Sudan, may break  apart beneath the pressure of its own management. In 
this sense the state is no  longer the solution to the problem or the provider of 
security, but part of the  problem itself. The fact that the Sudanese 
government, for example, has become  aware of the feebleness of  the instrument on 
which it has to rely, makes  it more determined to suppress any form of 
opposition in their way. It is by  this logic that this government has become the 
primary instrument of violence  directed against its own people. Such state 
violence and failure are vividly  illuminated in the number of Sudanese civilians
seeking refuge in Chad and  elsewhere. These are mesmerised people for whom 
their own state has so utterly  failed to provide the basic necessities for 
human existence that they prefer to  leave their own homes to the unknown but 
almost always wretched existence beyond  the frontiers of their own state. 
In Africa inefficiency and exploitation  are less dramatic phenomena than 
state violence, but they are the most  recurrent. The extractive role of the 
state and the degree to which it extorts  revenues from the common man in order to 
provide benefits to a privileged group  of government employees or loyalists 
and clients is very much more evident than  its efforts to achieve a better 
life for all. Unlike in the industrial  capitalist states where one of the 
functions of the government is to divert  resources from producers to consumers, 
and from those with more to those with  less, African governments more often 
than not make the transfer in the opposite  direction. Resources are transferred 
from those with little political influence  to those  with more political 
influence. In this way African leadership  makes itself distinctive from others 
through the self perpetuating nature of  groups of beneficiaries. 
On the continent, inefficiency, exploitation and  deprivation are all 
expressed, not only through neo-patrimonial patterns of  social relationships, but 
most evidently through corruption, which  simultaneously benefits those with 
more political influence, while at the same  time distorting the application of 
any decent or universalistic criteria for  governing a state or allocating its 
resources and benefits. The African  governments sometimes present the 
external economy, and especially multinational  companies, as exploitative forces to 
their own domestic economy, but these  companies often act as the mechanism 
through which the same governing elite  extracts a surplus from the economy, and 
also a channel through which they  establish a clientelist relationship with 
the external world. Where states are  efficient and accountable the role of 
such transnational companies ceases to be  a problem. Some of them employ locals 
who otherwise would be tempted to depart  to the West.
Conclusion
Some African countries have made commendable  progress in development and 
good governance at this time, and there might be  some truism in the claim that 
the recent mass attempts by Africans to emigrate  to the West have been induced 
by the world-wide-web and the television stations  that bring images of 
Western opulence even to the remotest parts of the world.  However, the underlying 
causes for emigration are more complex than these  simplistic interpretations, 
and no matter the positive balance sheet we might  like to draw of African 
economic and political development in the last few  years. 
It is true that deep-seated social and economic failures underlie  some of 
the problems faced by African states, but it is also accurate to say  that these 
problems themselves are in key respects political ones, for which  political 
solutions must be found before there will be any chance of improving  the 
social and economic structures that can improve livelihoods and keep people  at 
home. Yet it is certain that a political community’s existence can only be  
founded on an adequate convergence of the interests of the various groups making  
up the community, and on a sense of national consciousness and mutual  
obligations. Furthermore, heterogeneity and disparate elements in African  
communities render a common political life difficult, and one of the greatest  errors of 
some contemporary leaders has been to presume that they can command  
homogeneity into existence by fiat. This equally scares some people and sets  them on 
the run. 
One of the greatest tragedies of contemporary Africa lies  in the fact that 
many of those comparatively few states which have seemed to be  in a position 
to build effective institutions on the basis of shared and  integrative values 
have dramatically failed to do so. Mineral rich Democratic  Republic of Congo, 
oil rich Nigeria and fertile Uganda are some of the most  striking examples. 
In these cases the most evident source of the problem,  expressed in the 
concept of bureaucratic authoritarianism, has been the refusal  of those ruling 
elite to accept the diminution in their position of power and  privilege which 
accountability would imply, and their willingness to resort to  repression and 
constitutional changes as a means to protect it. 
It should  equally be noted that civil wars, prolonged strife among 
communities, and  military dictatorship have also greatly contributed to impeding 
positive  development in some African countries. People who think that effective 
political  order are remotely in prospect will choose to leave for places where 
they feel  there are hopes for reasonably skilful, people-centred and honest 
governments of  a non-personalistic kind. 
Furthermore, the standards that some politicians  try to set during their 
electoral campaigns are often too unrealistic. If they  finally come to power, 
and with the depths of the problems to be solved becoming  apparent, it becomes 
more and more difficult to sustain the image of what they  had thought would 
be their political conduct. They end up becoming what Migdal  has described as ‘
wind-up toys lumbering single-mindedly through the various  stages of 
development’ (Migdal, 1988: 5). Even by more modest standards, many  states have 
faltered badly in building the capacities to improve the situation  of their 
societies in ways commensurate with contemporary global developments.  Their 
failure to cultivate a national and unitary feeling among the citizens,  and their 
limited success in implementing their own legislation have ultimately  affected 
the very coherence and character of the states themselves and led to  
widespread disillusionment and emigration among the people. 
In some  countries, and in the so-called century of hope, the future still 
looks gloomy,  and a new cynicism has crept into scholarship on African 
development. There is  only minimal participation by the state leaders in the 
maintenance of economic  ties between internal and external groups, all these pointing 
to the limited  penetration of society by the national centres of authority. 
State-society  relations only seem to be worsening. As exemplified by the 
ongoing crisis in  Ethiopia, what is now proving to be a common pattern is grave 
suspicion and  resistance to state designs by un-assimilating minorities who 
now view  government policies as presaging dire threats to their survival. 
Development  experts would suggest that the only solution to the problem of 
emigration would  be an amelioration of the economic and social conditions back 
in the countries  from where the immigrants are coming. While it might be odd 
to argue against  this view, there is the need to see the role of politics in 
the process as well.  If governments remain clientelist, corrupt, inefficient 
and prebendal, if they  fail to share the limited resources they might have 
in an equitable and  inclusive way, if the country is mismanaged, people will 
become alienated,  hopeless and breadless. Improving the economic situation of 
badly governed  countries might be good, but failing to correct political 
wrongdoing will leave  many of the problems that precipitate emigration unsolved.”
The above article  was published in the CODESRIA Bulletin, numbers 3 and 4,  
2006. 

“Additional Tourism Development Areas,” SOS  Colley
Bubacarr K. Sowe
The Secretary of State for Tourism and Culture,  Angela Colley has said that 
to promote the development of quality tourist  facilities up country, her 
department, in its Tourism Development Master Plan,  will create additional 
tourism Development areas, the majority being in the  rural areas.
“The Department of State and the Gambia Tourism Authority will  also 
encourage investment in ecologies and other forms of tourist accommodation  along the 
banks of The River Gambia”, SOS Colley said.
She was responding to  a question from Hon Bora Mass, the Member for Kiang 
East, who asked for what  plans her Department was making to improve the 
provincial tourism industry,  which could reduce unemployment in the provinces.
SOS Colley said: “We feel  that in order to give the tourists a fuller 
picture of The Gambia, and to enable  the experience of the true and real Gambia, we 
must sample the hospitality of  the entire country”.
The Secretary of State added that the benefits of  tourism trade must not 
only be restricted to the urban areas, but must also  spread to the rural areas 
to help provide jobs and improve the livelihoods of  the rural population.

Profile of the New AG
Marie Saine  graduated at St Joseph’s High School in 1992 and later proceeded 
to St  Augustine’s High School where she took the A level exams in 1994.
She left  the shores of this country in 1996 and travelled to Malaysia. She 
enrolled at  the Islamic University of Malaysia in 1996 where she studied law.
She  obtained her law degree in 2000 and returned to The Gambia the same 
year. She  was called to the Gambian Bar the same year. She was appointed to the 
position  of state counsel that year. She later rose to the position of Senior 
State  Counsel and Principal State Counsel.
She later travelled to South Africa  where she obtained her LLM in Human 
Rights at the University of Pretoria in  2005. She returned to The Gambia and 
continued working for the state. She was  appointed acting Deputy Director of 
Public Prosecutions in January 2007. She  later become Technical Adviser at the 
Office of the President, a position she  held until her recent appointment as 
Attorney General and Secretary of State for  Justice.

Kanyiba Clocks One Year Incommunicado
By Fabakary B.  Ceesay
Mr. Kanyiba Kanyi, a UDP supporter who was arrested at his home  village of 
Bonto in Kombo East, has now served one year in detention. Mr. Kanyi,  a staff 
of Christian Children Fund (CCF), was arrested on 18 September 2006. Mr.  
Kanyi, has not appeared before any court of law on any charge since his arrest,  
last year.
According to his family members, they have moved heaven and earth  to locate 
their breadwinner but to no avail. They said they visited all the  suspected 
locations where his captors might have detained Mr. Kanyi. They  lamented that 
they have been up to Janjangbureh Prison but could not establish  his 
whereabouts. They noted that they have made countless enquiries at the state  central 
prison at Mile Two, but which bore no fruits. They lamented how they are  
living in a state of agony any time they think of their loved one. The family  
members who were almost in tears, said they lacked words to express how  
disheartening the continued detention of Kanyi is to them. They said they left  
everything in the hands of God. Mr. Kanyiba had left behind a pregnant wife who  is 
now nursing a six month old baby boy. It could be recalled that Mr. Kanyi was  
arrested at his home in the evening of 18 September 2006, by four 
plainclothes  men who identified themselves as state security agents. He was said to have 
been  forcefully pushed in a waiting cab and quickly whisked away. Since that 
day, his  family has never set their eyes on him. A case has been filed 
before the High  for his release.

Accused Sentenced For Assaulting  Imam
By  Modou Jonga
Magistrate E.F M’bai of the Brikama Magistrates Court on  Wednesday 12 
September, 2007 delivered his judgment on the trial involving one  Samba Bah, an 
Imam, and one Kemo Saho, the accused.
In delivering a lengthy  judgment, the presiding magistrate recalled that the 
accused was charged with  assault leading to grievous bodily harm against the 
complainant on 6 October  2005 at Farato in the Kombo North and that the 
prosecution has called three  witnesses.
The magistrate recalled that the complainant said he was cut with  a cutlass 
by the accused who hid behind a mango tree. He said the complainant  informed 
the court that he reacted by raising a stick to hit the accused, that  he did 
this with a weak strength due to the assault by the accused. The  magistrate 
said the offence was reported to the Brikama Police Station, and then  to the 
Health Centre, and that the white gown worn by the complainant at the  time of 
the assault was tendered and marked as an exhibit. While appreciating  the 
efforts of the defence counsel in defending their client, the magistrate  
recalled that the complainant was subjected to unpleasant questions during cross  
examination that were totally irrelevant to the court and offensive to the  
complainant.  The magistrate noted that the accused has admitted that he  had a 
tussle with the complainant, and that prior to the said assault, he had  reported 
the complainant to one Lamin Sonko, a community leader. 
According  to the magistrate, the medical certificate of the accused was 
rejected by the  court on the grounds that there are differences in dates of the 
assault and the  date the certificate was issued, but that the cloth worn by 
the accused was  tendered and admitted in court as exhibit.
The Magistrate further noted that  the accused had called three witnesses in 
the persons of Dembo Touray, Baba  Sillah and Sadibou Camara.
Commenting on the address of the defence counsel,  the magistrate recalled 
that the defence counsels were of the view that the  accused acted in 
self-defence in the face of repeated provocations by the  complainant. On the prosecution
’s address, the magistrate noted that the  prosecutor is of the view that the 
accused acted with intent to assault the  complainant; that the accused had 
assaulted the complainant.
The magistrate  stated that he is not satisfied with the statement that the 
accused acted in  self-defence. He noted the fact that the accused was injured 
twice and that the  matter was reported twice to Brikama Police Station, but 
nothing was done about  it. He further expressed satisfaction that the 
prosecution had proved its case  beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was found guilty 
by the trial  magistrate.
Lawyer Gomez urged the court not to impose a custodial sentence.  He urged 
the court to impose a suspended sentence as a safety precaution to  avoid future 
occurrence on the part of the convict, as the latter is a first  time 
offender and a family man.
The prosecutor, corporal Badjie, applied for  compensation for the 
complainant based on section 145 (1) of the Criminal  Procedure Code. The convict was 
accordingly sentenced to a period of two years  and fined ten thousand dalasis, 
in default to serve an additional one-year in  prison. Both sentences are to 
run consecutively.

Ous Jallow Starts  Season on High
By Modou Nyang
Young Gambia superstar Ousman Jallow started  his club season with a 5-1 
bashing of Duba Alfugeirah on Thursday with Jallow  setting up the opener. 
Jallow returned to the first team of Alain FC after  serving a season long 
loan at Moroccan outfit Raja Casablanca. And recent  Scorpions debutant marked 
his return to the United Arab Emirates top club by  notching the ball with his 
head for Ahmad Khamis to score in the 11th minute.  
However Duba sniffing danger with Alain’s early opener fought an canceled  
out the lead in the 24th and ending the first period on even terms. But Alain  
regrouped in the second and fired four goals to finish-off the match. Jallow 
was  substituted early in the second half by striker partner Naser Khamis.
The two  sides – Alain and Duba Alfugeirah, opening their 2007/08 account in 
the first  round of the Head of State Cup championship competitions in Dubai, 
and Alain  showed good tact following a good preseason in Switzerland.

Brann Lament Tijan Absence
By Modou Nyang
Brann Bergen lost 1-0 at  home to club Brugge in the UEFA Cup 1st round on 
Thursday citing the absence of  a number of star players including Tijan Jaiteh.
The Norwegian Tippelegien  league leaders lost the young Gambian midfield 
star to injury and his absence  for the important game with other first team 
players caused Brann to slip to a  goal down late in the match.
Brann held on to the game until Francois  Sterchele broke the deadlock in the 
85th minute after the home side had already  substituted leading goal scorer 
Thorstein Helstad and Captain Martin Andresen to  rest them for their coming 
games. “I’m disappointed that we don’t play a better  game, and I’m only 
satisfied with some parts of the second half.”, Brann’s head  coach Mons Ivar 
Mjelde said after the match. “A draw or a win for us would have  been fair, and it
’s annoying to get that goal against at the end”, Mjelde  continued.
Brann now face a tough challenge to overturn the result on October  4th when 
they travel to Belgium to face Club Brugge for the second leg. And it  is not 
yet clear whether Jaiteh will be fit to make the all-important trip.  Brann 
are favourites to win the Norwegian league they presently sit at the top  with 
42 points, 4 clear of their closest rival Viking FK.
 



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com


To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2