Yero wrote,
"Lastly, Haruna missed the beauty of Chicago when he had an opportunity to grace UGAMA on Labor Day (September 2007) at the mid-west conference. He was no where to be seen or heard on the phone despite numerous fruitless efforts, but those that did will not tease at Chicago in the way he did.
Maybe, I am missing something here. Where did Haruna call chicago "shit-side"? I remember him calling Chicago using the urban terminology "Shitown". Some people use the spelling "Shytown" to refer to Chicago. That surely can't be conflated to a derogatory reference.
I wasn't going to opine on this until Jabou respond to Haruna's notes.But I see that it is getting a life of it's own with Yero using the same cudgel to hit Haruna on an un-related issue...vis-a-vis his absence from a conference in Chicago.
I will love to see where Haruna made off handed and derogatory remarks towards Chicago. I must have missed that email.
Y Jallow <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Sister Jabou & Ousman,
Ousman, greetings there! I keenly followed the debate of my friend Haruna. I think that he is too much into this Edwards fellow to an extent, far in his support of him-'el d' gore.' Having said that, he deserves a pardon from both you and Jabou. If Haruna were of the Black Panthers like my friend, Dr. Larry Pinkney, that would have been another excuse I would take from him, for the later alleged of Obama’s pretentious black blood but dines the opposite. Further that he boycotted their rallies. I will check my archives to forward the said piece which I didn’t end up publishing. But it is obvious if Obama joins them in their activism, there is a tendency to loose the opposites' support today. So he (Obama) is playing his politics well.
On the other hand, Haruna’s John Edward Darboe won’t make a bad president like some of the world’s characters observed, notably Bush and Blair moving the world to wars. That’s a complete turn-off.
In my view, Obama is a hope for liberation for both the minorities and the many others trapped in the ‘color’ panorama. The latest smear campaign against the guy about attending ‘dara’ at younger age, or being from a Muslim family is in fact a plus to the guy. The Clinton Campaign is not scoring points with it. In fact, hardly will any listen to them. If such is to be raised at all, then that would violate the very religious tolerance they are preaching. It brings to memory our Muslim brother in Congress from Minnesota whose records of modesty is in the open-The Honorable Keith Ellision (May God prolong his life.) The US congress came to disarray upon his decision to take oath using the Holy Quran then. The ‘storms in the tea-cups’ then were not justified because what you believe in, take oath with it.
Lastly, Haruna missed the beauty of Chicago when he had an opportunity to grace UGAMA on Labor Day (September 2007) at the mid-west conference. He was no where to be seen or heard on the phone despite numerous fruitless efforts, but those that did will not tease at Chicago in the way he did.
So my challenge to him is to layout John Edward Darboe’s plan of actions.
Otherwise, thanks for the debate, and all three of you have some educative points.
Regards,
Yero.
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:39:50 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> To: [log in to unmask]> > Amen, Ms Jabou you said it all.> > > -----Original Message-----> From: [log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask]> Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 8:11 am> Subject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> > > > Haruna,> I have to confess that you lost my interest when you delved into "Chicago > hitside" Chicago shitside?> ren't you just a tad bit angry for a discussion that is supposed to help you > in friends and influence people on behalf of the candidate you profess to > upport?> fter reading your last response, I had a hard time trying to discern whether > ours was a personal anger towards Barack Obama because he was of mixed race, > ttended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review, or was a community > rganizer in the South side of Chicago and failed to include all the Ghettos in > he United States in that effort and you think
all of these are supposed to be > ndictments against him or if your truly feel that the way to promote Edwards > as to drag his opponents in the gutter?> I guarantee you that if you ran your response by any camp of the Edwards > ampaign, they would have asked you not to post it.> have never seen John Edwards drag his opponents reputation or record in the > utter because he is intelligent enough to know that this is hardly a way to win > otes and that people are sick and tired of this sort of senseless tirades.> ohn Edwards speaks about how in his youth, he witnessed lawyers and judges in > is native South Carolina> > stand up against racism during the civil rights era and how they risked their > ives and had to be escorted to work by Federal Marshalls and yet, they kept > n. He speaks of the admiration he had for these people standing up against > acism. He would not wonder if people would vote for Obama because he is of > ixed race.> Edwards may have sued insurance
companies and won some judgements against them, > ut that has not resulted in any changes that prevent insurance companies > inding loopholes to pay out claims. Just ask the victims of Katrina.> nd the case for which Edwards won the largest judgement was for a family whose > hild got her hair or was it a limb caught in the drainage system of a swimming > ool.> What supporters of the various candidates should concentrate on is to present > hat their candidate can do for the people when elected so they can convince > oters that they are the right person and how they do t hat matters a great > eal. Engaging in maligning the other candidate as a strategy to win supporters > ever works and tends to be symptomatic of some personal issue the those who > ngage in it may have. Also, when supporters engage in the latter, they become > iabilities as opposed to being assets.> ake it easy Haruna, rage does not draw in people, it makes them head in the > pposite direction and it is
bad for the heart. It is the people who will have > he last word.> ow, I shall leave you to it.> abou > > > -----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo > o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 6:44 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou.> > > > > > > Haruna," Jabou.> Yes Ma'am, hope all's well. Good to hear you again.> > Too long winded so I will be brief." Jabou.> > cannot for the life of me, believe mine own ears. Jabou? Dis-ease for > ong-windedness? As Rocco Mediate is wont to quip of Tiger, If there ever were a > > ood time to die, I'm red to go. Jabou, I'm extremely sorry for my long winds. > I will have been remiss were I not to have been comprehensive with your > ueries of John Edwards. In addition, I intended to share other value-added > rocess for discernment.> > remmembered a good friend of mine, Corporate attorney Charles McClure > hared, "Haruna, our job is to discourage our clients' customers from desiring > etail and comprehension
without running roughshod to minimalist law. My > lients include Insurance Agencies and multi-national corporations". The ones > ho > eem to own just about everything Jabou. "And, when it comes to any challenge > n courts of law, we encourage fellow corporate attorneys and judges, to > eview the entire constitution, ammendments, and precedent law". I knew the > reat > harles was unto something. This is exactly the reason why John Edwards > hooses cases carefully for advocacy sakes. I enjoy your long winds from Foroyaa > > abou. I know you were being sarcastic but it struck me befuddled.> > ow then.> > Just a few important points." Jabou.> > es. Let'r Rip!> > Edwards fought corporate America on behalf of his clients as a litigation > ttorney." Jabou.> > ndeed. John Edwards challenged the parts of law that Insurance and drug > ompanies relied on to stifle claims for errors and omissions. Indeed. Indeed. > ohn Edwards litigated profusely and with all his might, for his
clients, the > lliterate of law, the powerless to challenge wrongdoing, and in the process, > e forced clarifications of hitherto un-interpreted law to yield precedent > hat discouraged the culprit corporations and other from taking refuge in > mbiguity. I am sorry Jabou. Sometimes you must be long-winded to yield value > ontext and comprehension. I am told long directional winds can be harnessed > or > nergy.> > When he won on behalf of those clients, he was paid very well for his > fforts." Jabou.> > would suppose so. Lawyers, like carpenters, doctors, masons, engineers, > nd dishwashers, must receive value for effort and productivity. John Edwards > id not choose to litigate just any infringement. The ones he chose to > itigate have national and constitutional dimensions. His remuneration came > rom > hatever the judge determines is just penalty or compensation for victims and > heir advocate lawyer. The fees for lawyers are communicated to their clients > rior to
representation. They are normally a percentage of the settlement or > enalty for corporate wrongdoing. Whether John Edwards was paid very well or > ot, is not terribly significant to me. Whatever he was paid, he invested > eavily in his foundations (the poverty center, One America, The Ninth ward of > ew Orleans, Carolina's poor and dispossessed. All while his wife Libby was > nder doctor's care for terminal illness. Barak, like his wife, is an > ccomplished lawyer. They chose to side with corporate interests that John > dwards > erves notice to. Comparative values my dear.> > He did not offer his services gratis when he sued those corporations." > abou.> > should think not. Besides he has his wife's medical bills to pay and his > hildren to raise. Further, were he to have lost any of the cases, he will not > ave been compensated for his fees were reliant on his victory over evil and > urisprudent compensation therefrom. That is why John Edwards represented > he indigent
and those of lesser means than his fees would require. He was > onfident in the victory of good over evil, and he took enormous risks of loss.> > Perhaps you can share with us the major changes that came about as a result > f Edwards winning these lawsuits." Jabou.> > 'm sorry I must be long to do your query justice my Jabou.> > . When we desire democracy, whose cardinal tenet is The rule of common > aw, we desire that the common comprehends law that contains the rights and > rivileges whose aversion by other should trigger judicious challenge. In a > ociety where there are some (possibly one partner to that law), who are > blivious > o this rule of law and democracy indigents harp on about. That is where the > eed for lawyers comes in. They are the bedrock of due-diligence and > emocracy. John Edwards being a lawyer, intrinsically accrues value to any > ociety > n which he practices.> > . Lawyers choose from several areas of practice. Not all lawyers choose > ases for
advocacy for the indigent. John Edwards chose advocacy law. He is > aluable to democracy and equal justice under the law.> > . When John Edwards wins his cases, a precedent in law is established so > hat no matter which of the contiguous United States including Hawaii that are > artner to the constitution, may rely on such precedent. That assists in > iscouraging fraudulent practice by rogue corporations who seem to own just > bout > verything.> > . Jabou, you and I, though never among John Edwards' direct clientele, are > urrently benefitting from John Edwards' legal victories. For the specific > aws and precedent, I refer you to the public records of John Edwards' cases.> > Speaking of votes that have had a major impact on American lives, I would > ay none top that list more than the Iraq war." Jabou.> > ow do you mean??? I beg to differ. I do agree that the senate of which John > dwards was a part, approved a military campaign to apprehend Saddam and > ring him to
answer to charges of mass murder and belligerent foreboding. Many > raquis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis lost their lives and liberties at the hand of > addam. Perhaps I would agree with you that the campaign was badly > rosecuted. For which Edwards cannot be to blame. He saw fit however, to > pologise for > hatever part he may have played in the cantankerous prosecution of a > ampaign of conscience. A Solid Human. I make no apologies for John Edwards.> > and Edwards voted for the war" Jabou.> > ohn Edwards voted along with his coleagues to approve a military campaign > n Iraq. Not for the Iraq war we now witness. He is being magnanimous in > emorse of poor prosecution of the campaign. I would like John Edwards to > pprove > military campaign against me in that manner. And I will not require apology > f him.> > and it has impacted American lives as well altered how America is viewed > y the World forever." Jabou.> > ndeed. Anything America does, impacts on the lives of Americans
and world > itizens in a big way. That is why circumspect and due-diligence is advised in > rosecutions of campaigns.> > Haruna, your amazingly harsh rhetoric against Obama is bordering on the > swift boat" strategy of the last elections." Jabou.> > am not familiar with the Swift Boat incident. I therefore do not consider > t in demarches. I am sorry you regard our exchange here as harsh rhetoric > gainst Obama for on mine own part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, > ut for the general. Besides, in my effort to solicit support for John > dwards, it will be utterly foolhardy to offend other, including Obama. You and > I > ust leave open, the prospect of future collaboration between John Edwards and > arack Obama. Here, we engage in studious discernments and recognition of > omparative values. I advice temperance toward John Edwards.> > you don't want the angry label being made against your candidate to be true > or his supporters." Jabou.> > hould the angry label
be self-fulfilling against John Edwards, We will > nvent commensurate compassion and understanding. We are children of God/Allah. > > abbil Aalameen.> > Enough of negative campaigning already! Another reason why Obama is a > reath of fresh air?" Jabou.> > ndeed Obama is a breath of fresh air. John Edwards is Freshivating.> > Have a good weekend." Jabou.> > hank you my sister. As if Allah was aware of your prayer. I made merry and > roduced value for other this weekend. I pray for your glorious sustenance > ll weekends. Thank you for the prayer.> > our bestest brother, Haruna.> -----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo > o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 3:54 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > > "Haruna," Jabou.> > es Darling, how are you. I like the way you speak and what you say always. > ou have an immensely powerful voice fertilized, as our friend Karim is > ont > o drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and measured tone. Any
candidate > ould like to have your support. I'm not giving up on Ousman either. I love > im > very much. Just don't get any funny ideas Ousman.> "I do not know that what Edwards can represent to the American people is > ot the same as what Obama will." Jabou.> I was under the same impressions too. Then I began a study of senators who > ater run for President in a revolutionarily different way that reviews > arginal values. There is a wealth of information that when properly > eviewed > r > eviewed in the directions of questions one might have when making marginal > istinction assessments, you will come away with a benign but discerning > onclusion. If you review the matters/bills that Clinton, Obama, and > dwards > ave > ffered votes on in the senate, (not the ones Obama and Clinton > onveniently > bsented themselves on for expediency sakes), you can draw important > emographic information from their affect on Americans, both in quantity > nd > uality > hat has brought me
to the conclusion that Edwards is a more valuable > hange to > more Americans than either Obama or Clinton. I had also come to the > onclusion that Obama will be a more valuable change to immigrant Americans > han > ither Edwards or Clinton, and that Clinton is the hungriest of them all to > > ecome President. Take a look at how many bills Obama and Clinton absented > hemselves from voting on and find out what those bills are. Then look at > he > ills > ll three voted on and you will notice that Edwards never absented himself > rom voting on critical and significant matters as well as those matters > hat > re politically inexpedient to vote on. A solid human.Let us know how your > eview looks like.> "Also, I do not think that there is any indication that Obama beileves in > eligion as other than a moral compass." Jabou.> Probably not and I did not qualify Obama's belief in that realm. I shared > dwards' belief in the realm.> bama had recognized the value of religious
congregations and the almost > omplete patronage of evangelists by Republicans. Given his political > ndustriousness, he embarked on a campaign to wrest a slice of this section > f > ociety > rom Republicans and rightly so. I happen to believe that you neither court > or discount the religious evangelist vote. You allow them to choose > ithout > iving the facade of their participation as a group in governance and > dministration of the state. An active campaign to woo them trends too > losely > o > uid-pro-quo and if you do not deliver their perceived quid, they can > everely > align your administration. Only a seasoned governor and policy-maker can > ecognize these subtle flaws in character. Because as you know, the > vangelists > are active voters and they vote in order to skew public policy in favour of > > heir religion. They do not hide their intentions and motives. It takes a > trong character to resist the temptation to maligned judgement. When you > sk > bama, he
frames his responses this way:> We have to show America that Democrats too care about religion". That > tatement itself says a lot about his dispensation. Jabou, I know that you > re a > devout muslim. Have you ever felt like you have to show me and Suntou and > alanding how much you care about Islam? If you begin to run for President, > nd > you then embark on an active campaign to show us how much you care about > slam, > hether that is good or not, would it not give me pause in distinctions? Our > riend Ousman shared that Obama fought for the downtrodden in the south side > f Chicago. I will share more on this later but that southside vote was > hat > ained Obama the state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African > merican. When you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, > ou > ill come to the realisation that there are other communities in Chicago > hat > ere down-trodden for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these other > own-trodden
people of South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in North > arolina fought for the down-trodden in other areas of North Carolina, > outh > arolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts, Alabama, and > alifornia. > peak with Jimmy Carter and ask him to share his views on Obama and > dwards. He > will tell you he loves both of them but that Edwards is more valuable to > ll > merica than Obama. It is not because Edwards is white and more Americans > re white that is why we say this. It is because of the quality of his > alues > nd since African Americans are disproportionately disenfranchised in all > tates, they received the value of Edwards' efforts more than Whites. > dwards > oes not apologise for that. When the question arose in one of the debates > bout > bama being black and Clinton being a woman, John Edwards responded, and in > > ublic, that whoever does not vote for Obama because he is black, or > linton > ecause she is a woman, he, John Edwards does NOT
want your vote. Now the > ntrained eye will view this as political suicide and indeed it costed > dwards > ome white support because they began labelling him as an angry candidate. > f > ourse they cannot make a distinction between anger and passion and half of > hose idiots belong in an insane asylum anyways, we just don't have a > omprehensive mental health intitution in the US that is why some of these > etards > ind their way on talk shows and radio programs and TV interviews. Obama > as a > een eye on the Presidency, has had even before the "grassroots downtrodden > dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.> "As for being beholden to corporate America, well, all American presidents > re somewhat beholden to corporate America, and the difference is perhaps > ust > matter of degrees." Jabou.> Let us say you are right in the immediate above. You are therefore > dmitting > hat corporate America does command inordinate and a formidable power to > oerce American Presidents. The same will
therefore be true of Evangelic > merica. Now Edwards actually challenged the powers of corporate America in > he > court of law and won overwhelmingly. He therefore helped stem the cancer in > orporate America and enhanced the good in it for the prosperity of America. > n > his campaign speeches when he ran with Kerry and now, he has always served > otice that he is immune to corporate control, no matter how formidable that > ay > be. And another thing. I think your recognition that both Edwards and Obama > ill represent refreshing change in the American Presidency gives you hope > hat > the two will be different from past American Presidents. We all therefore > ake solace in the idea of an Edwards or Obama Presidency. You will however > > gree with me that in America, Just being President does not innoculate the > rdinary American from the relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical and > ther > orporate interests. We must therefore go further than just the Presidency > f > t
> s the refreshing change we are really interested in. It has come to light > hat most of Obama's advisors are leftover Clinton advisors. You may > emmember > hen one of those advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former > resident Bill Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton > dvisor was > peaking of his past relations with Bill Clinton and therefore he, Obama is > ot privy to that and cannot say anything on it. And the former Clinton > dvisor is now an Obama advisor. Discernments. I also would like our > rother > nd > riend Ousman to share with us one tangible value accrued from Obama's > campaign for down-trodden votes in south SHitown". It is evident that the > nited > teel workers of America, The united Mine Workers of the same nation, The > arpenters Union, and many more see more value in John Edwards than Obama, > linton, or other. Is there a national union of the un-employed of South > hicago? We > ay be presented with mirages of
"grassroots campaign for votes" and > grassroots conscientious advocacy".> "Having said that, Obama has spoken out against the insurance companies who > re at the top of the food chain when it comes to corporate America because > hey own just about everything." Jabou.> Exactly my point Jabou. First, you should never speak against any corporate > r individual interest because they own just about everything. That is the > rong impetus. Now John Edwards did not stop at speaking out against rogue > orporate policies, he challenged them in courts on the behalf of Americans > nd > overcame their enormous powers. He is only a lawyer as was Obama. Has Obama > > iled suit against any rogue corporate policy on the behalf of the common > merican? Those insurance companies he "spoke out against", has he > hallenged > hem > n a court of law on the merits or demerits of his disdain of them? Obama > as head of the Harvard Law Review. If Obama finds himself in a situation > here >
vote-counting can yield a loss of his election to a Republican candidate, > hat do you think will happen? What do you think Obama will do?> "You are right, I like both Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards is > > reat candidate, but I do not think that he will win the primaries." Jabou.> I think you are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards as an angry > andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of Iowa, New Hampshire, > outh > arolina, and Nevada. We are talking about primaries aren't we???? Check > round your neck of the woods around Cleveland Tennessee, Chattanooga, > emphis, > ashville, Jackson, Milan, etcetera. Let us know what you find out.> "He is good but America sees him as having been part of the old > stablishment even if only because he ran before." Jabou.> I know you're just being sarcastic here. Who among all candidates, > epublican or Democratic, has not been part of the old Establishment. Don't > e > wayed > y cliches of these lunatics
who fell through the administrative cracks for > ack of enough space at rehab.> "I think Obama on the other hand stands a very good chance of winning the > rimaries and Americans are angry enough at the republicans so that none of > heir candidates stands a chance in the national elections, no matter who > hey > re." Jabou.> Indeed Jabou. I agree with you. Obama does stand a very good chance of > inning at least one of the primaries if not all. As far as the anger of > mericans > t Republicans, I presume you share that all the democratic candidates > tand > qual chances when pitted against a Republican. We can all cherish that but > et us focus for now on the voting democrats for the democratic primaries. > hat we are trying to discern is "EDwards, Obama, or Clinton, who represents > he > most valuable and desirable change for Democratic Americans". After the > rimaries, we will change our effort by removing the word democratic from > ur > uery.> "So a wonderful and
winning strategy for Democrats this time would be an > bama/Edwards ticket." Jabou.> That wouldn't be a bad ticket either. If that ends up being the ticket it > ould be formidable. It will be more formidable against the Republicans in > ll > f America if it turns out to be Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton, > dwards-Obama, or Edwards-Gore. What do you think????> "Together, they can restore the hopes of the people and make great headway > owards reversing the damage that the last 8 years of a Bush > dministration > as done" Jabou.> Anything is a refreshing change from the last 8 years of cluelessness.> "Thanks for providing the link to Ousman's blog, I had not known of it > efore. As for Andrew Young Ousman, he dances to the music of corporate > merica > and so he has to pay the piper so no surprises there. He has now made a > areer > f leading the pillagers and plunderers into Africa. Dr King is no doubt > urning in his grave." Jabou.> This is not fair. I have contributed in
forming a comprehensive alliance > gainst my person and Edwards' person. This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. > he > wo of you simply are too overwhelming even if I summon the entire essence > f my > very being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not to gang up > gainst me and Edwards.> "Jabou" > What Friggin-ever. You mean Jabou and Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New > ambians!!> Haruna.> > > ----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo > o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > > Jabou, you know you are beautiful. I can never get upset at you.> I think you like both John Edwards and Obama, but that you like Obama more > ecause his election will represent much needed change.> Would you consider that the election of John Edwards will also represent > hange?> The work therefore is in discerning between John Edwards and Obama, who is > he more desirable change!!!> Now, like you about John Edwards, I
like Obama a lot because I think he is > rilliant, popular, and his election will give hope to a lot of Immigrant > mericans.> John Edwards not only represents hope for more Americans than Obama, he has > > hown the value of the change that he may accrue us. I have not had the > pportunity to witness a sampling of Obama's change except that he looks > ifferent > rom past presidents.> John Edwards' One America Foundation offers some hope.> ohn Edwards' rebuilding efforts in the Lower Ninth ward offer hope in what > > merica can be.> ohn Edwards fought with Huge corporate outfits on the behalf of regular > nd > ommon Americans, and John Edwards and Obama are both lawyers.> enator John Edwards of North carolina will get dirty for you and with you.> orth Carolina used to be the home of Senator Jesse Helms.> ohn Edwards enjoys enormous peer support and the most endorsements from > emocratic governors of states than either Obama or Clinton.> ohn Edwards is more electable across
the United states than any candidate > urrently seeking the presidency, Republican or Democrat. Check the stats.> ibby Edwards is beautiful and is not beholden to corporate America. Mrs. > bama is beautiful but may be beholden to corporate America. She sits on > he > board of Walmart.> ohn Edwards is handsome and is not given to religious distinctions nor > oes > e believe religion ought to be mixed with governance. John Edwards > elieves > n Religion as moral and ethical compass, not administrative compass.> Obama is good. John Edwards is more valuable to all America. Edwards-Obama > ay be formidable. What do you think my dear? Lemme know, Lemme know!! You > now > usman is an Obama-head!!! Don't you??> Your friend and colleague Haruna. > In a message dated 12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, > [log in to unmask] writes:> Haruna,> I both like and have a great deal of respect for John Edwards and his wife > lizabeth for many reasons, some of which are mentioned
below. However, > > m > n Obama supporter myself. I also think Obama has a better chance of > eing > lected because among other things, he is seen as the "change" candidate > y > country that desperately needs change and Hillary ain't it. Infact, I > hink Hillary has turned into a "snake oil sales lady" and she is > verything to > everyone in her zeal to be president and I do not trust her at all and the > est of the country is beginning to see through her. I think that Edwards' > est > shot will be as a V.P for Obama. I think together they would make an > wesome > eam.> ow, now, don't get too upset.> abou> > > > > ----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo > o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 6:49 pm> ubject: I wish to share John Edwards with you:> > > > > > e just concluded another conference call with David Medina, the national > > ampaign director for John Edwards.> We are excited about the prospects for a John Edwards Presidency. We are > leased
to have the support of Harry Belafonte and Danny Glover in South > arolina. Our gratitude to the United Steel workers Union, The Mine > orkers > Union, > he Carpenters Union, and Friends of the Earth Action Network. I am proud > f > ohn Edwards' performance in the just concluded democratic candidate > ebate > > ponsored by the Des Moines Register. John Edwards is humble, intelligent, > nd > tands up for the Common American even on unpopular issues. He has vision > > nd > haracter, attributes that are extremely valuable to American foreign > olicy > nd stature in the world.> We would like volunteers to assist in South Carolina, Iowa, Nevada, and > ew > Hampshire. We also wish to ask for your financial support if your time > ill > ot allow volunteering. Please visit us at _http://www.johnedwards.com_ > http://www.johnedwards.com) and thank you for your support and company > oward > > ne-America.> Haruna.> > > > *************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
> http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > nterface> t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]> ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> > > > > _______________________________________________________________________> ore new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - > ttp://webmail.aol.com> > o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > nterface> t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the Gambia-L archives,
go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]> > > ________________________________________________________________________> More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com> > ����������������������������������������������������������> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]>
����������������������������������������������������������>
_________________________________________________________________
Share life as it happens with the new Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_122007
http://gambian.blogspot.com
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|
