GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Beran jeng <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:10:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Lameen:

Its healthy for you to differ with me i compliment you for that. My criteria
can't be sub standard because you happen to see it that way.
In any situation there most be a way of monitoring that situation.During
the campaign,whatever that might have transpired,be it impartial access to
the public media,threats and intimidations of voters,the opposition should
not have compromised or be negligent about it.They should have protested to
have it stopped or boycott the process.Many on this list have encourage the
opposition to boycott if they deem the process flawed.
I am not in the business of judging after the fact. If the circumstances
that you alluded to prevailed,why didn't the opposition protest vehemently
even to the extent of boycotting the elections.Why did they continue to
participate in this farce process as you describe it? The opposition ,that
is all of them,said in their concession that it was free and fair why should
i see it otherwise.I forwarded lots of articles and reports to the list but
despite the contents,the opposition on the ground declared the election to
be generally free and fair.My interpretation of this declaration of the
election as free and fair is that despite some hitches here and there,it is
generally accepted and same view was conveyed by international observers and
people that i spoke to back home.That is not to say that it was perfect but
generally accepted.With this cross section of opinions all pointing to more
or less the same conclusion that the elections was free and fair,i do not
see how i can contradict that.Help me if you can Lamin.

Beran




>From: Lameen Sisawo Barrow <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: The Gambia and related-issues mailing list
><[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: PRESIDENT JAMMEH'S REMOVAL /M.B
>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:14:25 -0500
>
>Beran
>
>I  beg  to  differ  with  some  of  the  points  you  raised  in  your
>post.  Having  forwarded  so  many  news  articles  on  issues  in  The
>Gambia, I  am  wondering  if  you  have  taken  the  time  to  read  all
>those  articles.  You  call  this  farce  of  an  election  free  and
>fair?  I  am  at  a  lost  for  words.  If  this  election  meets  your
>criteria,  then  you  have  very  low  standards  where  "free  and  fair"
>is  the  criteria.  One  does  not  have  to  live  in  The  Gambia  to
>know  that  People  have  been  intimidated,  bribed  and  harrashed  by
>APRC  thugs.  Even  the  resident  Jaliba  of  APRC,  Tombong,  will  not
>say  that  equal  time  was  accorded  to  all  political  parties.  This
>election  was  just  another  front  to  legitimize  the  APRC.
>
>Alagie  Barrow
>
>Nashville  TN
>
><<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>
>
>To view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
>at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
>To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
>[log in to unmask]
>
><<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>

To view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>//\\<<//\\>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2