For interested folk.

Malanding


-----Original Message-----
From: Ashwani Vasishth [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 3:37 PM
To: Environmental Ecology News
Subject: Obituary: Garrett and Jane Hardin Chgoose To Pass On
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-hardin20sep20,1,32
93205.story

Los Angeles Times:
     September 20, 2003

OBITUARIES
Garrett Hardin, 88; Ecologist Sparked Debate With Controversial Theories

By Elaine Woo
Times Staff Writer

Garrett Hardin, a leading ecological thinker whose contrarian stands have
influenced debates on abortion, immigration, foreign aid and other prickly
issues, apparently took his own life Sunday. He was 88 and was found dead,
along with his 81-year-old wife, Jane, at their Santa Barbara home.

The Hardins, who had been in poor health for many years, belonged to the
Hemlock Society and had made clear to their family that they intended to
choose their own time of death, a niece, Rebecca Hardin, told The Times on
Friday.

Hardin was an emeritus professor of human ecology at UC Santa Barbara,
where he taught for three decades until his retirement in 1978.

A prolific author, he was best known for a 1968 essay, "The Tragedy of the
Commons," in which he argued that humanity must curtail some of its
freedoms to stave off overpopulation and environmental disasters.

His beliefs led to a number of controversial positions, from his support
of legal abortions on demand (this from a lifelong Republican) to his
"tough love" approach to foreign aid.

"Whether you agree or disagree, he has drawn the lines of debate" on many
critical issues, Paul Ehrlich, a Stanford University biologist and author
of the influential 1968 book "The Population Bomb," said of Hardin some
years ago. "He has generated a lot of thought, and we wouldn't be where we
are without him."

Hardin was born in Dallas, but grew up all over the Midwest because his
father's job with the Illinois Central Railroad required him to relocate
every few years. He found some stability in annual summer sojourns on his
grandfather's 160-acre farm near Butler, Mo., a "lonely but wonderful"
place where he gained an appreciation of open space and had time to think
and read.

He contracted polio as a child, which left him with a weakened and
shortened right leg. But he became an excellent swimmer and was active in
his Chicago high school's student newspaper and drama programs. He briefly
entertained thoughts of becoming a professional actor but abandoned them
when he realized that his disability would limit him to lesser roles.

He became a zoology major at the University of Chicago, where one of his
mentors was W.C. Allee, an early ecologist who sounded alarms about
overpopulation. After earning his bachelor's in 1936, he pursued graduate
work in biology at Stanford. He earned a doctorate in 1941 after
completing a paper on microbial ecology.

He married Jane Swanson in 1941. They are survived by four children, four
grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. He also leaves a sister and two
brothers.

In 1942, he was hired as a researcher at the Carnegie Institution's plant
biology lab at Stanford, where he tried to create food from algae. Most of
the lab's products were foul, both in taste and smell. But what eventually
turned Hardin off was his growing belief that creating any large-scale
food source, whether from algae or another substance, would ultimately
only worsen overpopulation.

In 1946, he left Stanford for the small liberal arts college that became
UC Santa Barbara. Through most of the 1950s, he was immersed in updating
the college biology program.

Controversial Views

In 1960, he developed a course in "human ecology" to stimulate thinking
about population and environmental issues. In 1963, he began to urge the
legalization of abortion and lectured across the country on the need to
free women from "compulsory pregnancy."

Going a step further, he joined an underground network that helped women
in the U.S. obtain abortions in Japan and Mexico. He justified his stance
to fellow conservatives with the argument that the cost of raising an
unwanted child far exceeded the price tag for an abortion.

He made his seminal statement in "The Tragedy of the Commons," an essay
that has appeared in more than 100 anthologies since its original
publication in Science magazine in December 1968.

The essay grappled with a fundamental question: How should society manage
resources, such as land, water, fish and air, that belong to everyone?

To help visualize the problem, he offered the cow pasture as his basic
metaphor. The natural tendency of a herdsman would be to graze as many
animals as possible in a common pasture. But if every herdsman using the
pasture followed the same principle, the pasture would eventually become
barren. "Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all," Hardin wrote.

The solution, he concluded, could only be "mutual coercion, mutually
agreed upon," to limit the destruction of the commons. It was not an
untried concept, he said, pointing out that society had already enacted
laws Q coercion Q to prohibit people from using common lands or waters as
dumping grounds for waste. Now, Hardin argued, it was time to give up the
notion of the commons in breeding and acknowledge that "freedom to breed
will bring ruin to all."

In the case of overpopulation, Hardin said, the coercion could take the
form of China's one-child law, or regulations offering tax credits only
for the first two children in a family.

"The only way we can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms
is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon," Hardin
wrote.

Public Debate

His article elicited strong reactions. The essay "is a disquieting work,
masquerading under an innocuous title and written in witty, sensible
prose," Richard S. Lewis wrote in the journal Science and Public Affairs
in 1972. "Hardin isn't out to frighten anybody, but readers may find that
their view of the future has been shaken."

This was only the first of Hardin's public controversies.

In 1974, he wrote about immigration as a threat to population control in
an article titled "Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor."
Never one to be politically correct, he offered an unpopular answer to the
question of whether every person on Earth has an equal right to an equal
share of the planet's resources. He used the lifeboat as a metaphor for a
rich nation, such as the U.S., outside of which, he wrote "swim the poor
of the world, who would like to get in, or at least to share some of the
wealth."

The quandary, he said, was, "What should the lifeboat passengers do?"

If they follow the Christian idea of being "our brother's keeper," they
would let everyone in, even if it means cramming 150 people into a boat
built for 60. But then, he wrote, the boat is swamped and "everyone
drowns. Complete justice, complete catastrophe."

No Easy Answers

The answer, he said, was to "be constantly on guard against boarding
parties," a solution that he acknowledged was morally abhorrent to many
people. But he believed the wisest course of action was to limit the
boarders, control the borders. He even opposed efforts to help developing
countries sustain themselves through humanitarian assistance, such as an
international food bank. "A world food bank is a commons in disguise,"
which will be exploited by some countries and do little in the end to make
such countries self-limiting and self-sufficient.

Such "tough love" stands repelled many people, such as theologian Richard
Neuhaus, who said Hardin's lifeboat ethics were obscene. "A world that
would choose Garrett Hardin's options is a world in which I for one would
not care to survive," Neuhaus, who wrote "In Defense of People," once
said.

Considering the harshness of his views, Hardin often surprised people with
his gentle demeanor.

"He had a rare gift, sitting with a group of students, faculty or friends,
and with a gorgeous, grandfatherly smile, asking questions that made you
think and hurt," said Barry Schuyler, an environmental studies professor
at UC Santa Barbara and longtime colleague.

"He would say, 'Can you take the commons and use it to the point where it
is completely ruined? The Earth is a commons and if you overpopulate it to
the point where life is intolerable for everybody on it, you have a
tragedy.' He would make people see it. What a lovely man but what
perfectly appalling questions he posed for us."

 * * *

Copyright 2003 Los Angeles Times

***   NOTICE:  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this
material is distributed, without profit, for research and educational
purposes only.   ***


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [log in to unmask]

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
   [log in to unmask]

Or, for more options, go to:
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/envecolnews/

For questions or suggestions, contact:
   [log in to unmask]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~