GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:56:48 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (762 lines)
 
The wind of dishonour is very powerful Oconteh. Do not underestimate it.  I'm 
not sure what value dishonour accrues Barack Obama. Even you should not  
settle for blatant and jarring dishonour. From anyone.
 
Haruna.
 
In a message dated 12/17/2007 11:41:06 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Amen, Ms  Jabou you said it all.


-----Original Message-----
From:  [log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007  8:11 am
Subject: Re: John Edwards/  Haruna/Jabou.



Haruna,
I have to confess that you lost my  interest when you delved into "Chicago 
hitside" Chicago shitside?
ren't  you just a tad bit angry for a discussion that is supposed to help you 
in  friends and influence people on behalf of the candidate you profess to  
upport?
fter reading your last response, I had a hard time trying to  discern whether 
ours was a personal anger towards Barack Obama because he  was of mixed race, 
ttended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law  Review, or was a 
community 
rganizer in the South side of Chicago and  failed to include all the Ghettos 
in 
he United States in that effort and  you think all of these are supposed to 
be 
ndictments against him or if  your truly feel that the way to promote Edwards 
as to drag his opponents  in the gutter?
I guarantee you that if you ran your response by any camp of  the Edwards 
ampaign, they would have asked you not to post it.
have  never seen John Edwards drag his opponents reputation or record in the  
utter because he is intelligent enough to know that this is hardly a way  to 
win 
otes and that people are sick and tired of this sort of senseless  tirades.
ohn Edwards speaks about how in his youth, he witnessed lawyers  and judges 
in 
is native South Carolina

stand up against racism  during the civil rights era and how they risked 
their 
ives and had to be  escorted to work by Federal Marshalls and yet, they  kept 
n. He  speaks of the admiration he had for these people standing up against  
acism. He would not wonder if people would vote for Obama because he is of  
ixed race.
Edwards may have sued insurance companies and won some  judgements against 
them, 
ut that has not resulted in any changes that  prevent insurance companies 
inding loopholes to pay out claims. Just ask  the victims of Katrina.
nd the case for which Edwards won the largest  judgement was for a family 
whose 
hild got her hair or was it a limb caught  in the drainage system of a 
swimming 
ool.
What supporters of the  various candidates should concentrate on is to 
present 
hat their candidate  can do for the people when elected so they can convince 
oters that they  are the right person and how they do t hat matters a great 
eal.   Engaging in maligning the other candidate as a strategy to win 
supporters  
ever works and tends to be symptomatic of some personal issue the those  who 
ngage in it may have. Also,  when supporters engage in the  latter, they 
become 
iabilities as opposed to being assets.
ake it easy  Haruna,  rage does not draw in people, it makes them head in the 
 
pposite direction and it is bad for the heart. It is the people who will  
have 
he last word.
ow, I shall leave you to it.
abou  


-----Original Message-----
rom: Haruna Darbo  <[log in to unmask]>
o: [log in to unmask]
ent: Sun, 16  Dec 2007 6:44 pm
ubject: Re: John Edwards/  Haruna/Jabou.






Haruna," Jabou.
Yes Ma'am, hope  all's well. Good to hear you again.

Too long winded so I will be  brief." Jabou.

cannot for the life of me, believe mine own ears. Jabou?  Dis-ease for  
ong-windedness? As Rocco Mediate is wont to quip of  Tiger, If there ever 
were a  

ood time to die, I'm red to go.  Jabou, I'm extremely sorry for my long 
winds. 
I will have been remiss were  I not to have been comprehensive with  your 
ueries of John Edwards.  In addition, I intended to share other value-added  
rocess for  discernment.

remmembered a good friend of mine, Corporate attorney  Charles McClure  
hared, "Haruna, our job is to discourage our  clients' customers from  
desiring 
etail and comprehension without  running roughshod to minimalist law.  My 
lients include Insurance  Agencies and multi-national corporations". The ones 
 
ho 
eem to  own just about everything Jabou. "And, when it comes to any  
challenge  
n courts of law, we encourage fellow corporate attorneys and judges,   to 
eview the entire constitution, ammendments, and precedent law". I knew  the  
reat 
harles was unto something. This is exactly the reason  why John Edwards  
hooses cases carefully for advocacy sakes. I enjoy  your long winds from 
Foroyaa  

abou. I know you were being  sarcastic but it struck me befuddled.

ow then.

Just a few  important points." Jabou.

es. Let'r Rip!

Edwards fought  corporate America on behalf of his clients as a  litigation 
ttorney."  Jabou.

ndeed. John Edwards challenged the parts of law that   Insurance and drug 
ompanies relied on to stifle claims for errors  and  omissions. Indeed. 
Indeed. 
ohn Edwards litigated profusely and  with all his  might, for his clients, 
the 
lliterate of law, the  powerless to challenge  wrongdoing, and in the 
process, 
e forced  clarifications of hitherto  un-interpreted law to yield precedent 
hat  discouraged the culprit corporations  and other from taking refuge in  
mbiguity. I am sorry Jabou. Sometimes you must  be long-winded to  yield 
value 
ontext and comprehension. I am told long  directional  winds can be harnessed 
or 
nergy.

When he won on behalf of those  clients, he was paid very well for his  
fforts." Jabou.

would  suppose so. Lawyers, like carpenters, doctors, masons, engineers,  
nd  dishwashers, must receive value for effort and productivity. John   
Edwards 
id not choose to litigate just any infringement. The ones he chose  to  
itigate have national and constitutional dimensions. His  remuneration came  
rom 
hatever the judge determines is just  penalty or compensation for victims  
and 
heir advocate lawyer. The  fees for lawyers are communicated to their  
clients 
rior to  representation. They are normally a percentage of the  settlement or 
 
enalty for corporate wrongdoing. Whether John Edwards  was paid very  well or 
ot, is not terribly significant to me. Whatever he was  paid,  he invested 
eavily in his foundations (the poverty center, One  America,  The Ninth ward 
of 
ew Orleans, Carolina's poor and  dispossessed. All while his  wife Libby was 
nder doctor's care for  terminal illness. Barak, like his  wife, is an 
ccomplished lawyer.  They chose to side with corporate  interests that John 
dwards  
erves notice to. Comparative values my  dear.

He did not offer  his services gratis when he sued those corporations."   
abou.

should think not. Besides he has his wife's medical bills to  pay  and his 
hildren to raise. Further, were he to have lost any of  the cases, he  will 
not 
ave been compensated for his fees were  reliant on his victory over  evil and 
urisprudent compensation  therefrom. That is why John Edwards  represented 
he indigent and  those of lesser means than his fees would require.  He was 
onfident  in the victory of good over evil, and he took enormous  risks of  
loss.

Perhaps you can share with us the major changes that came about  as a  result 
f Edwards winning these lawsuits." Jabou.

'm  sorry I must be long to do your query justice my Jabou.

. When we  desire democracy, whose cardinal tenet is The rule of   common  
aw, we desire that the common comprehends law that contains the  rights  and 
rivileges whose aversion by other should trigger  judicious challenge. In a  
ociety where there are some (possibly one  partner to that law), who are  
blivious 
o this rule of law and  democracy indigents harp on about. That is  where the 
eed for lawyers  comes in. They are the bedrock of due-diligence and  
emocracy. John  Edwards being a lawyer, intrinsically accrues value to any  
ociety  
n which he practices.

. Lawyers choose from several areas of  practice. Not all  lawyers choose 
ases for advocacy for the indigent.  John Edwards chose advocacy  law. He is 
aluable to democracy and  equal justice under the law.

. When John Edwards wins his cases, a  precedent in law is  established so 
hat no matter which of the  contiguous United States including  Hawaii that 
are 
artner to the  constitution, may rely on such precedent. That  assists in  
iscouraging fraudulent practice by rogue corporations who seem  to  own just 
bout 
verything.

. Jabou, you and I, though never among  John Edwards' direct clientele, are  
urrently benefitting from John  Edwards' legal victories. For the specific 
aws  and precedent, I  refer you to the public records of John Edwards' cases.

Speaking of  votes that have had a major impact on American lives, I  would 
ay  none top that list more than the Iraq war." Jabou.

ow do you mean??? I  beg to differ. I do agree that the senate of which  John 
dwards was a  part, approved a military campaign to apprehend Saddam and  
ring him  to answer to charges of mass murder and belligerent foreboding. 
Many   
raquis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis lost their lives and liberties at the  hand  
of 
addam. Perhaps I would agree with you that the campaign was  badly  
rosecuted. For which Edwards cannot be to blame. He saw fit  however, to  
pologise for 
hatever part he may have played in the  cantankerous  prosecution of a 
ampaign of conscience. A Solid Human.  I make no apologies for  John Edwards.

and Edwards voted for the  war" Jabou.

ohn Edwards voted along with his coleagues to approve a  military  campaign 
n Iraq. Not for the Iraq war we now witness. He is  being magnanimous  in 
emorse of poor prosecution of the campaign. I  would like John Edwards to  
pprove 
military campaign against me  in that manner. And I will not require  apology 
f him.

and it  has impacted American lives as well altered  how America is  viewed  
y the World forever." Jabou.

ndeed. Anything America does, impacts  on the lives of Americans and  world 
itizens in a big way. That is  why circumspect and due-diligence is  advised 
in 
rosecutions of  campaigns.

Haruna, your amazingly harsh rhetoric against Obama is  bordering on the  
swift boat" strategy  of the last elections."  Jabou.

am not familiar with the Swift Boat incident. I therefore do  not  consider 
t in demarches. I am sorry you regard our exchange here  as harsh  rhetoric 
gainst Obama for on mine own part, I know no  personal cause to  spurn at 
him, 
ut for the general. Besides, in my  effort to solicit support for  John 
dwards, it will be utterly  foolhardy to offend other, including Obama. You  
and 
I 
ust leave  open, the prospect of future collaboration between John  Edwards 
and  
arack Obama. Here, we engage in studious discernments and   recognition of 
omparative values. I advice temperance toward John   Edwards.

you don't want the angry label being made against your  candidate to be  true 
or his supporters." Jabou.

hould the  angry label be self-fulfilling against John Edwards, We will  
nvent  commensurate compassion and understanding. We are children of 
God/Allah.   

abbil Aalameen.

Enough of negative campaigning already! Another  reason why Obama is a  
reath of fresh air?" Jabou.

ndeed Obama  is a breath of fresh air. John Edwards is  Freshivating.

Have a  good weekend." Jabou.

hank you my sister. As if Allah was aware of your  prayer. I made merry  and 
roduced value for other this weekend. I  pray for your glorious sustenance  
ll weekends. Thank you for the  prayer.

our bestest brother, Haruna.
-----Original  Message-----
rom:  Haruna Darbo  <[log in to unmask]>
o:  [log in to unmask]
ent:  Sat, 15 Dec 2007 3:54 pm
ubject: Re:  John Edwards/  Haruna





"Haruna,"  Jabou.

es Darling, how  are you. I like the way you speak and what  you say  always. 
ou  have an immensely powerful voice fertilized, as  our friend Karim  is  
ont 
o drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and   measured tone. Any candidate  
ould like to have your support. I'm  not  giving up on Ousman either. I love 
im  
very much. Just  don't get  any funny ideas Ousman.
"I do not know  that what  Edwards can  represent to the American  people is 
ot the same as  what Obama will."  Jabou.
I was under the same impressions too. Then I  began a study of  senators  who 
ater run for President in a  revolutionarily different  way that reviews  
arginal values.  There is a wealth of information  that when properly  
eviewed  
r 
eviewed in the directions of  questions one might have when  making  marginal 
istinction assessments,  you will come away  with a benign but  discerning 
onclusion. If you  review the  matters/bills that Clinton, Obama, and  
dwards 
ave   
ffered votes on in the senate, (not the ones Obama and Clinton    
onveniently 
bsented themselves on for expediency sakes), you can   draw  important 
emographic information from their affect on  Americans,  both in  quantity 
nd 
uality 
hat has brought  me to the conclusion  that Edwards is  a more valuable 
hange to  
more Americans than  either Obama or Clinton. I had  also come  to the 
onclusion that Obama  will be a more valuable change to   immigrant Americans 
han 
ither  Edwards or Clinton, and that  Clinton is the  hungriest of them all to 

ecome President. Take a  look at how many bills Obama  and Clinton  absented 
hemselves  from voting on and find out what those bills  are.  Then look at  
he 
ills 
ll three voted on and you will notice that   Edwards  never absented himself 
rom voting on critical and  significant  matters as well  as those matters 
hat 
re  politically inexpedient to  vote on. A solid  human.Let us know how  your 
eview looks  like.
"Also, I do not think that there is any  indication that Obama  beileves in  
eligion as other than a  moral compass."  Jabou.
Probably not and I did not qualify Obama's  belief in that realm. I  shared  
dwards' belief in the  realm.
bama had recognized the value  of religious congregations and  the almost  
omplete patronage of  evangelists by Republicans.  Given his political  
ndustriousness, he  embarked on a campaign  to wrest a slice of this section 
f  
ociety  
rom  Republicans and rightly so. I happen to believe that you neither    
court 
or discount the religious evangelist vote. You allow them to   choose  
ithout 
iving the facade of their participation as a group  in  governance and  
dministration of the state. An active  campaign to woo  them trends too  
losely 
o 
uid-pro-quo  and if you do not deliver  their perceived quid, they can   
everely 
align your administration.  Only a seasoned governor and  policy-maker  can 
ecognize these subtle  flaws in character.  Because as you know, the  
vangelists 
are  active voters and  they vote in order to skew public policy  in favour 
of 

heir  religion. They do not hide their intentions and motives. It   takes  a 
trong character to resist the temptation to maligned   judgement.  When you 
sk 
bama, he frames his responses this   way:
We have to show America that Democrats too care about religion".   That  
tatement itself says a lot about his dispensation. Jabou, I  know  that you 
re a  
devout muslim. Have you ever felt like  you have to  show me and Suntou and  
alanding how much you care  about Islam? If you  begin to run for President, 
nd  
you  then embark on an active  campaign to show us how much you care about  
slam, 
hether that is good or  not, would it not give me pause in  distinctions? Our 
riend Ousman shared  that Obama fought for the  downtrodden in the south side 
f  Chicago. I  will share more on  this later but that southside vote was 
hat 
ained   Obama the  state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African 
merican.   When  you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago,  
ou  
ill come to the  realisation that there are other  communities in  Chicago 
hat 
ere down-trodden  for one reason  or the other. But Obama  chose these other 
own-trodden people  of  South Chicago. Edwards  running as senator in North 
arolina  fought for the  down-trodden in  other areas of North Carolina,  
outh 
arolina, Georgia,  Louisiana,  Tennessee,  Massachussetts, Alabama, and 
alifornia. 
peak with  Jimmy   Carter and ask him to share his views on Obama and 
dwards. He   
will tell you he  loves both of them but that Edwards is more   valuable to 
ll 
merica than Obama.  It is not because Edwards is  white  and more Americans 
re white that is why we  say this. It  is because of  the quality of his 
alues 
nd since African  Americans  are  disproportionately disenfranchised in all 
tates,  they received the value  of  Edwards' efforts more than Whites.  
dwards 
oes not apologise for  that. When the  question arose  in one of the debates 
bout 
bama  being black and Clinton being  a  woman, John Edwards responded, and in 

ublic, that whoever does  not vote for  Obama because he is black, or  
linton 
ecause  she is a woman, he, John Edwards  does NOT want your  vote. Now the  
ntrained eye will view this as political  suicide and  indeed it  costed 
dwards 
ome white support because they began    labelling him as an angry candidate. 
f 
ourse they cannot make a   distinction  between anger and passion and half of 
hose idiots  belong  in an insane asylum  anyways, we just don't have a  
omprehensive mental  health intitution in the US  that is why  some of these 
etards 
ind  their way on talk shows and radio   programs and TV interviews. Obama 
as a  
een eye on the  Presidency, has had even  before the "grassroots  downtrodden 
 
dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.
"As for being beholden to  corporate  America, well, all American  presidents 
re somewhat beholden  to  corporate America, and the difference is  perhaps 
ust 
matter  of  degrees." Jabou.
Let us say you are right in the immediate above.  You are  therefore  
dmitting 
hat corporate America does  command inordinate and  a formidable power  to 
oerce American  Presidents. The same will  therefore be true of Evangelic   
merica. Now Edwards actually  challenged the powers of corporate  America in  
he 
court of law and  won overwhelmingly. He  therefore helped stem the cancer in 
 
orporate  America and  enhanced the good in it for the prosperity of America. 
n    
his campaign speeches when he ran with Kerry and now, he has always   served  
otice that he is immune to corporate control, no matter  how  formidable that 
ay  
be. And another thing. I think  your  recognition that both Edwards and Obama 
ill  represent  refreshing  change in the American Presidency gives you hope 
hat  
the  two will  be different from past American Presidents. We  all therefore 
ake   solace in the idea of an Edwards or Obama  Presidency. You will however 

gree with me that in America, Just being  President does not innoculate  the  
rdinary American from the  relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical  and  
ther 
orporate  interests. We must therefore go further than just  the Presidency   
f 
t 
s the refreshing change we are really  interested in. It  has come to light  
hat most of Obama's advisors are  leftover  Clinton advisors. You may 
emmember  
hen one of those   advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former 
resident   Bill  Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton  
dvisor was  
peaking of his past relations with Bill Clinton and  therefore he, Obama is  
ot  privy to that and cannot say  anything on it. And the former  Clinton 
dvisor is  now an Obama  advisor. Discernments. I also would  like our 
rother 
nd  
riend  Ousman to share with us one tangible  value accrued from  Obama's 
campaign for  down-trodden votes in south  SHitown". It  is evident that the 
nited 
teel  workers of America,  The  united Mine Workers of the same nation, The 
arpenters  Union,  and  many more see more value in John Edwards than Obama, 
linton,  or   other. Is there a national union of the un-employed of South  
hicago? We  
ay be  presented with mirages of "grassroots  campaign for votes" and  
grassroots  conscientious  advocacy".
"Having said that, Obama  has spoken out against the  insurance companies  
who 
re at the top of  the food chain when  it comes to corporate America because  
hey own  just about  everything." Jabou.
Exactly my point Jabou. First, you should  never  speak against any  
corporate 
r individual interest because they   own just about everything. That is  the 
rong impetus. Now John  Edwards  did not stop at speaking out against rogue  
orporate  policies, he  challenged them in courts on the behalf of Americans  
nd  
overcame  their enormous powers. He is only a lawyer as  was Obama. Has Obama 
 

iled suit against any rogue corporate  policy on the behalf of the  common  
merican? Those insurance  companies he "spoke out against", has  he 
hallenged  
hem  
n a court of law on the merits or demerits of  his disdain of them?  Obama  
as head of the Harvard Law Review. If  Obama finds  himself in a situation 
here  
vote-counting can yield a  loss  of his election to a Republican candidate, 
hat  do you think  will  happen? What do you think Obama will do?
"You are right, I like  both  Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards  is 

reat  candidate, but  I do not think that he will win the primaries."   Jabou.
I think you  are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards  as an  angry 
 
andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of  Iowa, New  Hampshire,  
outh 
arolina, and Nevada. We are  talking about primaries aren't   we???? Check 
round your neck of  the woods  around Cleveland  Tennessee,  Chattanooga,  
emphis, 
ashville, Jackson, Milan,  etcetera. Let us know what  you  find out.
"He is good but America  sees him as having been  part of the old  
stablishment even if only  because he ran  before." Jabou.
I know you're just being sarcastic here.  Who among  all candidates,  
epublican or Democratic, has not been part  of  the old Establishment. Don't 
e  
wayed 
y cliches of  these  lunatics who fell through the administrative cracks  for 
 
ack of enough  space at rehab.
"I think Obama on the other hand  stands a very good  chance of winning the  
rimaries and  Americans are angry enough at the  republicans so that none of  
 
heir candidates stands a chance in the  national elections, no matter  who 
hey  
re." Jabou.
Indeed  Jabou. I agree with you.  Obama does stand a very good chance of   
inning at least one of  the primaries if not all. As far as the anger  of  
mericans  
t Republicans, I presume you share that all the  democratic  candidates  
tand 
qual chances when pitted against a   Republican. We can all cherish that  but 
et us focus for now on  the  voting democrats for the democratic primaries.  
hat we are  trying to  discern is "EDwards, Obama, or Clinton, who represents 
he  
most valuable  and desirable change for Democratic Americans". After  the  
rimaries,  we will change our effort by removing the word  democratic from 
ur   
uery.
"So a wonderful and winning  strategy for Democrats this time  would be an  
bama/Edwards  ticket." Jabou.
That wouldn't be a  bad ticket either. If that ends up  being the ticket it  
ould be  formidable. It will be more  formidable against the Republicans in 
ll   
f America if it  turns out to be Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton,  
dwards-Obama,   or Edwards-Gore. What do you  think????
"Together, they can restore  the hopes of the people and make  great  headway 
owards  reversing  the damage that the last 8 years  of a Bush   
dministration 
as done" Jabou.
Anything is a  refreshing change  from the last 8 years of  cluelessness.
"Thanks  for providing  the link to Ousman's blog, I had not known of it  
efore.  As for  Andrew Young Ousman, he dances to the music of corporate  
merica   
and so he has to pay the piper so no surprises  there. He has now made a  
areer  
f leading the pillagers and  plunderers into Africa. Dr King is  no doubt 
urning  in his  grave." Jabou.
This is not fair. I have  contributed in forming a  comprehensive alliance  
gainst my person and  Edwards' person.  This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. 
he  
wo of you  simply are  too overwhelming even if I summon the entire essence 
f my  
very  being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not to  gang 
up  
gainst me and Edwards.
"Jabou" 
What Friggin-ever.  You mean  Jabou and Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New    
ambians!!
Haruna.


----Original  Message-----
rom:  Haruna Darbo  <[log in to unmask]>
o:   [log in to unmask]
ent: Thu, 13  Dec 2007 11:26  pm
ubject:  Re: John Edwards/    Haruna





Jabou, you know you  are  beautiful. I  can never get upset at you.
I think you like both  John  Edwards  and Obama, but that you like Obama more 
 
ecause his   election  will represent much needed change.
Would you consider  that  the election  of John Edwards will also represent   
 
hange?
The work therefore  is in discerning between John   Edwards and Obama, who is 
 
he more  desirable   change!!!
Now, like you about John Edwards, I like Obama a lot    because I think he is 
 
rilliant, popular, and his election will   give  hope to a lot of Immigrant  
mericans.
John  Edwards  not only  represents hope for more Americans than Obama, he  
has 

hown the value  of the change that he may accrue us. I have  not had  the  
pportunity to  witness a sampling of Obama's  change except  that he looks  
ifferent  
rom past  presidents.
John  Edwards' One America Foundation offers  some  hope.
ohn Edwards'  rebuilding efforts in the Lower Ninth ward  offer  hope in what 

merica can be.
ohn Edwards fought with  Huge  corporate outfits on  the behalf of regular  
nd  
ommon Americans, and  John Edwards  and Obama are both  lawyers.
enator John Edwards of North  carolina will  get dirty  for you and with  you.
orth Carolina used to be  the  home  of Senator Jesse Helms.
ohn Edwards enjoys enormous peer  support   and the most endorsements from  
emocratic  governors of states  than  either Obama or Clinton.
ohn Edwards  is more electable across the  United  states than any  candidate 
 
urrently seeking the  presidency, Republican  or  Democrat. Check the stats.
ibby Edwards is  beautiful and is not  beholden  to corporate America. Mrs.  
bama  is beautiful  but may be beholden to  corporate America. She sits on 
he   
board of Walmart.
ohn Edwards  is handsome and is not given  to  religious distinctions nor  
oes 
e  believe religion  ought to  be mixed with governance. John Edwards  
elieves   
n Religion  as moral and ethical compass, not administrative   compass.
Obama is good. John Edwards is more valuable to all   America.  Edwards-Obama 
 
ay be formidable. What do you think  my  dear? Lemme  know, Lemme know!! You 
now 
usman is an  Obama-head!!!  Don't  you??
Your friend and colleague Haruna.  
In a message  dated  12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard  Time,   
[log in to unmask]  writes:
Haruna,
I both like  and have a  great deal of respect for  John  Edwards and his  
wife 
lizabeth  for many reasons, some of which  are  mentioned  below.  However,  

m 
n Obama  supporter  myself.  I also think Obama  has  a better  chance  of 
eing  
lected because among other   things,   he is seen as the "change"  candidate 
y  
country that desperately needs  change and Hillary ain't   it.   Infact, I 
hink Hillary has turned into a  "snake oil  sales  lady"  and she is 
verything to 
everyone in her zeal  to be    president and I do not trust her at all and 
the 
est of  the country  is   beginning to see through her. I think that  
Edwards' 
est  
shot will be as  a V.P  for Obama.   I think together they  would make an 
wesome   
eam.
ow,  now, don't get  too     upset.
abou




----Original     Message-----
rom: Haruna Darbo   <[log in to unmask]>
o:     [log in to unmask]
ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 6:49  pm
ubject:   I  wish to share John Edwards with     you:





e just concluded  another    conference call with David Medina, the national  

ampaign   director  for John Edwards.
We are excited about  the prospects  for a  John Edwards  Presidency. We are  
 
leased to  have the support of  Harry Belafonte  and Danny Glover  in  South  
arolina. Our  gratitude to the United  Steel   workers Union, The Mine 
orkers 
Union, 
he Carpenters    Union, and Friends of the Earth Action  Network. I am proud  
 
f  
ohn  Edwards' performance in the just  concluded  democratic  candidate 
ebate 

ponsored by the Des Moines   Register. John  Edwards is humble, intelligent,  
nd   
tands up  for the  Common American even on unpopular issues.  He  has vision  

nd  
haracter, attributes that are  extremely valuable  to   American foreign  
olicy  
nd stature in the  world.
We  would  like volunteers to  assist in South Carolina,  Iowa, Nevada, and  
ew   
Hampshire. We also wish to ask for  your financial support if   your time  
ill 
ot  allow  volunteering. Please visit us  at   _http://www.johnedwards.com_   
http://www.johnedwards.com)  and  thank  you  for  your  support and company 
oward 

ne-America.
Haruna.



*************************************See  AOL's top rated recipes  
http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
o  unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web 
 
nterface
t: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To  Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:  
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
o contact the  List Management, please send an e-mail  to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤




_______________________________________________________________________
ore  new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! -  
ttp://webmail.aol.com

o unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of  postings, go to the Gambia-L Web 
nterface
t:  http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L  archives, go to:  
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
o contact the  List Management, please send an e-mail  to:
[log in to unmask]


________________________________________________________________________
More  new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! -  
http://webmail.aol.com


To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of  postings, go to the Gambia-L 
Web interface
at:  http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the  Gambia-L archives, go to:  
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the  List Management, please send an e-mail  to:
[log in to unmask]








**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2