GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amadu Kabir Njie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:01:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Is it human nature to conform?

By Marya Burgess

Producer, BBC Radio 4's Mind Changers

Would you electrocute someone if an authority figure told you to do so? Or
give a response you know to be wrong if others in your group said it was
right? For more people than you might think, the answer could be yes.

Every day we try to fit in. We may like to think of ourselves as
individuals but most of the time we don't actually want to stand out too
much.
It's this idea of conformity that the American social psychologist Solomon
Asch studied in the 1950s, using nothing more complex than straight black
lines drawn on pieces of card. It's one of the classic experiments in
psychology, and Asch showed that many of us would rather deny the evidence
of our own eyes than stand out from the group.

Asch believed in individual integrity and, at a time when social
psychology was focussing on conformity to explain the Holocaust, he
designed an experiment to prove that people would stand up against group
pressure.

His unwitting subjects were unaware that the rest of the group were
stooges or plants, who had been instructed to say that one line was the
same length as another - even though it patently wasn't. Contrary to his
expectations, Asch found that a third of people went along with the group,
even when it contradicted the evidence of their own eyes.

But Asch found a way of explaining his results which tallied with his
positive view of human nature: going along with your peers and
acknowledging their views is a fundamentally social behaviour, without
which society would collapse.

Abdicate responsibility

One of his students, Stanley Milgram, was profoundly influenced by Asch's
work. If a third of people capitulated to peer pressure in this way,
Milgram wondered what would happen if the pressure came from an authority
figure.

In 1963 he conducted his infamous electric shock experiment, in which he
led people to believe that they were giving someone electric shocks when
they made mistakes on a word task.

Each was given the role of 'teacher' and, ensconced with the experimenter,
was unable to see the 'learner', but well able to hear his screams as the
shocks were delivered. The electric shock machine appeared to go right up
to 450V with labels saying "Danger - severe shock".

The majority of 'teachers' showed some reluctance to turn the dial to
increase the voltage, especially when the screams died down to be replaced
by silence. But when they wanted to stop, the experimenter - the authority
figure - insisted they carry on; 65% of people were willing to give
potentially lethal shocks simply because the experimenter told them to.

Even though there were in fact no shocks, just a screaming actor,
Milgram's experiment would be unlikely to get past an ethics committee
today.


Still less so Philip Zimbardo's controversial Stanford Prison experiment
in 1971, where assuming the uniform and the role of guards in a fake
prison led students to inflict a regime of brutality on their fellow
students who were playing the prisoners.
Whereas in Milgram's experiment the subjects passed responsibility to the
authority figure, in Zimbardo's they assumed authority themselves.

Although a long way from the black lines on a piece of card to which they
can trace their genesis, both experiments have been used to explain the
shocking change in behaviour of apparently ordinary people when employed
in Nazi death camps.

But perhaps the key, even there, was simply an unwillingness to stand out
from the crowd, even if it meant denying what was seen.

The first episode of Mind Changers was broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on
Tuesday, 9 December, 1100 GMT.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/magazine/3300635.stm

Published: 2003/12/09 09:49:48 GMT

© BBC MMIII

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ATOM RSS1 RSS2