GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jeng, Beran" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jun 2000 13:22:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (134 lines)
Kebba,

I agree with you that the commission is toothless and a joke.
The ball will soon be in their court again as is the case with
the inquest,which was submitted to the authorities since
may 15th and is yet to be made public,indicating their inability
to deal with it realistically.I expect the commissions findings
to be another thorn on them.

Do you have any suggestions if this merry go around
and or feet dragging continue ?

Beran



                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Dampha Kebba [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
                Sent:   Tuesday, June 13, 2000 12:04 PM
                To:     [log in to unmask]
                Subject:        Commission of Inquiry

                Latest reports from the commission are not encouraging, to say
the least. Up
                today, we have not seen anyone coming forward to point to a
single soldier
                or police as someone that fired a fatal bullet on April 10 and
11. We call
                upon anyone who has information otherwise to enlighten us.
People come here
                to narrate how they arrived after the fact and how they heard of
the
                destruction of property etc. Even the chief justice recognizes
that they are
                conducting a fruitless exercise. According to today's Observer
newspaper,
                the chief justice expressed frustration by rhetorically asking:
                "Did the shooters come from the moon? The pathologists
attributed the
                students' deaths to gunshot wounds".
                It is obvious that if they want to get to the bottom of this
thing, these
                are not the silly questions to ask. To establish who shot those
fatal shots,
                they should first of all ask about the people that were armed.
Ask them to
                account for their ammunitions. Anyone who is short, will be
presumed to have
                fired a shot. Then trace those bullets to the mortuary. This is
not Monday
                morning quarterbacking. I raised the same questions as soon as a
coroner's
                inquest was commenced. The more we prolong this thing with silly
proceedings
                before toothless commissions and inquests, the more we
compromise the
                integrity of the evidence. A case in point is the reported
statement of one
                lieutenant that appeared before the commission. He said, "We had
live
                ammunition but my men never shot at anyone. After returning to
the camp, I
                checked and confirmed that all our arms and ammunition were
intact". And I
                think there were reported deaths from bullet wounds at the same
place where
                his men operated. This is what you get from bogus commissions.
It enables
                culprits to perfect the doctoring of their evidence. At the end
of the day,
                the evidence that will be gathered from this forum would worth
very little
                to a prosecutor. In the meantime, evidence is being destroyed,
potential
                witnesses can be tampered with and the culprits can abscond. If
a self
                respecting prosecutor was in charge of this investigation,
he/she will be
                asking pertinent questions that can be used as evidence in
court. He/she
                would have taken control of all the arms that were used on April
10 and 11.
                He/she would have interrogated all the armed men on duty at
locations where
                casualties were reported. He/she would have interrogated all
commanding
                officers to get to the bottom of the orders that were given to
the armed men
                that opened fire on the children. He/she, instead of jailing the
students,
                would have treated them as potential witnesses and ask them to
account for
                what happened. In my humble opinion, this is how criminal cases
are
                investigated and prosecuted daily in civilized societies where
the
                authorities are interested in the pursuit of justice.
Commissions of inquiry
                are notorious for being a ploy by lawless governments to delay
the
                dispensation of justice. If we are not careful, no one will be
convicted for
                the crimes perpetrated on April 10 and 11. A commission of
inquiry or/and an
                inquest certainly cannot convict and punish someone. The
evidence gathering
                function of these bodies are also lacking. Why go through point
C if you
                want to get from A to B?
                KB


________________________________________________________________________
                Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the
Gambia-L
                Web interface at:
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2