GAMBIA-L Archives

The Gambia and Related Issues Mailing List

GAMBIA-L@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
abdoukarim sanneh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Gambia and related-issues mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 05:21:05 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (180 lines)
Hello Sister Jabou
  Thanks for the web link. What is happening in middle east is madness of the highest order. The media is not given an accurate picture of the folding events and that does not surprise me. Noam Chomsky have alway mentained that the political economy of the mass media-manufacturing its own conscience. I believe in the only way for peace in the religion is two state formula.

[log in to unmask] wrote:
  Just to be a little clearer/fairer about the situation in the Middle 
East....

Begin forwarded message:


_http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2928_ 
(http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2928) 

Media Advisory
Down the Memory Hole
Israeli contribution to conflict is forgotten by leading papers
7/28/06

In the wake of the most serious outbreak of Israeli/Arab violence 
in years, three leading U.S. papers—the Washington Post, New York 
Times and Los Angeles Times—have each strongly editorialized that 
Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon were solely responsible for 
sparking violence, and that the Israeli military response was 
predictable and unavoidable. These editorials ignored recent events 
that indicate a much more complicated situation.

Beginning with the Israeli attack on Gaza, a New York Times 
editorial (6/29/06) headlined "Hamas Provokes a Fight" declared 
that "the responsibility for this latest escalation rests squarely 
with Hamas," and that "an Israeli military response was 
inevitable." The paper (7/15/06) was similarly sure in its 
assignment of blame after the fighting spread to Lebanon: "It is 
important to be clear about not only who is responsible for the 
latest outbreak, but who stands to gain most from its continued 
escalation. Both questions have the same answer: Hamas and Hezbollah."

The Washington Post (7/14/06) agreed, writing that "Hezbollah and 
its backers have instigated the current fighting and should be held 
responsible for the consequences." The L.A. Times (7/14/06) 
likewise wrote that "in both cases Israel was provoked." Three days 
and scores of civilian deaths later, the Times (7/17/06) was even 
more direct: "Make no mistake about it: Responsibility for the 
escalating carnage in Lebanon and northern Israel lies with one 
side...and that is Hezbollah."

As FAIR noted in a recent Action Alert (7/19/06), the portrayal of 
Israel as the innocent victim in the Gaza conflict is hard to 
square with the death toll in the months leading up to the current 
crisis; between September 2005 and June 2006, 144 Palestinians in 
Gaza were killed by Israeli forces, according to a list compiled by 
the Israeli human rights group B'tselem; 29 of those killed were 
children. During the same period, no Israelis were killed as a 
result of violence from Gaza.

In a July 21 CounterPunch column, Alexander Cockburn highlighted 
some of the violent incidents that have dropped out of the media’s 
collective memory:


Let's go on a brief excursion into pre-history. I’m talking about 
June 20, 2006, when Israeli aircraft fired at least one missile at 
a car in an attempted extrajudicial assassination attempt on a road 
between Jabalya and Gaza City. The missile missed the car. Instead 
it killed three Palestinian children and wounded 15.

Back we go again to June 13, 2006. Israeli aircraft fired missiles 
at a van in another attempted extrajudicial assassination. The 
successive barrages killed nine innocent Palestinians.

Now we're really in the dark ages, reaching far, far back to June 
9, 2006, when Israel shelled a beach in Beit Lahiya killing eight 
civilians and injuring 32.

That's just a brief trip down Memory Lane, and we trip over the 
bodies of twenty dead and forty-seven wounded, all of them 
Palestinians, most of them women and children.

On July 24, the day before Hamas' cross-border raid, Israel made an 
incursion of its own, capturing two Palestinians that it said were 
members of Hamas (something Hamas denied—L.A. Times, 7/25/06). This 
incident received far less coverage in U.S. media than the 
subsequent seizure of the Israeli soldier; the few papers that 
covered it mostly dismissed it in a one-paragraph brief (e.g., 
Chicago Tribune, 7/25/06), while the Israeli taken prisoner got 
front-page headlines all over the world. It's likely that most 
Gazans don’t share U.S. news outlets' apparent sense that captured 
Israelis are far more interesting or important than captured 
Palestinians.

The situation in Lebanon is also more complicated than its 
portrayal in U.S. media, with the roots of the current crisis 
extending well before the July 12 capture of two Israeli soldiers 
by Hezbollah. A major incident fueling the latest cycle of violence 
was a May 26, 2006 car bombing in Sidon, Lebanon, that killed a 
senior official of Islamic Jihad, a Palestinian group allied with 
Hezbollah. Lebanon later arrested a suspect, Mahmoud Rafeh, whom 
Lebanese authorities claimed had confessed to carrying out the 
assassination on behalf of Mossad (London Times, 6/17/06).

Israel denied involvement with the bombing, but even some Israelis 
are skeptical. "If it turns out this operation was effectively 
carried out by Mossad or another Israeli secret service," wrote 
Yediot Aharonot, Israel’s top-selling daily (6/16/06; cited in AFP, 
6/16/06), "an outsider from the intelligence world should be 
appointed to know whether it was worth it and whether it lays 
groups open to risk."

In Lebanon, Israel's culpability was taken as a given. "The 
Israelis, in hitting Islamic Jihad, knew they would get Hezbollah 
involved too," Amal Saad-Ghorayeb, a professor at Beirut’s Lebanese 
American University, told the New York Times (5/29/06). "The 
Israelis had to be aware that if they assassinated this guy they 
would get a response."

And, indeed, on May 28, Lebanese militants in Hezbollah-controlled 
territory fired Katyusha rockets at a military vehicle and a 
military base inside Israel. Israel responded with airstrikes 
against Palestinian camps deep inside Lebanon, which in turn were 
met by Hezbollah rocket and mortar attacks on more Israeli military 
bases, which prompted further Israeli airstrikes and "a steady 
artillery barrage at suspected Hezbollah positions" (New York 
Times, 5/29/06). Gen. Udi Adam, the commander of Israel’s northern 
forces, boasted that "our response was the harshest and most severe 
since the withdrawal" of Israeli troops from Lebanon in 2000 
(Chicago Tribune, 5/29/06).

This intense fighting was the prelude to the all-out warfare that 
began on July 12, portrayed in U.S. media as beginning with an 
attack out of the blue by Hezbollah. While Hezbollah's capture of 
two Israeli soldiers may have reignited the smoldering conflict, 
the Israeli air campaign that followed was not a spontaneous 
reaction to aggression but a well-planned operation that was years 
in the making.

"Of all of Israel’s wars since 1948, this was the one for which 
Israel was most prepared," Gerald Steinberg, a political science 
professor at Israel's Bar-Ilan University, told the San Francisco 
Chronicle (7/21/05). "By 2004, the military campaign scheduled to 
last about three weeks that we’re seeing now had already been 
blocked out and, in the last year or two, it’s been simulated and 
rehearsed across the board." The Chronicle reported that a "senior 
Israeli army officer" has been giving PowerPoint presentations for 
more than a year to "U.S. and other diplomats, journalists and 
think tanks" outlining the coming war with Lebanon, explaining that 
a combination of air and ground forces would target Hezbollah and 
"transportation and communication arteries."

Which raises a question: If journalists have been told by Israel 
for more than a year that a war was coming, why are they pretending 
that it all started on July 12? By truncating the cause-and-effect 
timelines of both the Gaza and Lebanon conflicts, editorial boards 
at major U.S. dailies gravely oversimplify the decidedly more 
complex nature of the facts on the ground.

Norman Solomon on Mideast War, Jamal Dajani on Mosaic/LINK TV 
(7/28/06-8/3/06)

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤


 		
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low  PC-to-Phone call rates.

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html

To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

ATOM RSS1 RSS2