Very well Yero. So you refer to Ousman Conteh. Are you familiar with the
conference call Conteh refers to?
I am sorry I am too busy at this time to follow Dr. Pinkley's views on
Obama, and I'm not sure that will be valuable to me. I tend to form my opinions of
other based on study on character, record, and value from my own
perspective. Not terribly interested in other's opinion of other. Thank you anyway.
Haruna.
In a message dated 12/17/2007 2:22:23 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Bro. Haruna,
Ousman Conteh (O Conteh) is the one you are debating with from Chicago. I
am not refering to Ousman Ceesay. I hope that helps about Ous's mention.
But here are the links about Dr. Pinkley that I promised you.
I knew Dr. Pinkney is no Obamarite. Very obvious!!
I goggled some of his comments and please read:
http://www.blackcommentator.com/217/217_obama_trojan_horse_great_white_hope_pi
nkney_guest.html
http://www.izania.com/articles/political/black-america%27s-legacy-of-struggle/
See part two of my rejoinder soon, also would be reply to Ousman Ceesay.
Regards,
Yero.
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:54:20 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna/Jabou/Yero.> To: [log in to unmask]> > >
Yero my friend,> > You missed a wonderful opportunity to earn your stripes
as a prolific > journalist worth admiration. I want to thank you for your
regard of me as I hold > you in equal esteem. What you failed to do was to assist
Jabou in recognizing > where I called the southside of Chicago as
"Shitside". You did not share with > us where I did, nor did you advise due-diligence
and honour in community. > Allah would have loved you for it. We must not
worry too much about Haruna for > his life is an open book for all to see and
comment on. Our individual > relations with Allah and Community hold more
gravitasse and hope for our own > salvations. I am a bit disappointed in you too. I
am not sure why you found it > valuable to drag Ousman's name in your
"mediation". Ousman is a solid Human. He has > demonstrated that to us all. Ousman
will not malign any in this community > for expediency sakes. I advise you
forgive his name from soil.> > Your "friend" Haruna. I encourage you to work
further to stand up for truth > for life's worth. For Rabbil Aalameen sakes.> >
In a message dated 12/17/2007 12:40:34 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, >
[log in to unmask] writes:> > > Sister Jabou & Ousman,> > Ousman, greetings
there! I keenly followed the debate of my friend Haruna. I > think that he is too
much into this Edwards fellow to an extent, far in his > support of him-'el
d' gore.' Having said that, he deserves a pardon from both > you and Jabou.
If Haruna were of the Black Panthers like my friend, Dr. > Larry Pinkney, that
would have been another excuse I would take from him, for the > later
alleged of Obama’s pretentious black blood but dines the opposite. > Further that
he boycotted their rallies. I will check my archives to forward the > said
piece which I didn’t end up publishing. But it is obvious if Obama > joins them
in their activism, there is a tendency to loose the opposites' support >
today. So he (Obama) is playing his politics well. > > On the other hand, Haruna’
s John Edward Darboe won’t make a bad president > like some of the world’s
characters observed, notably Bush and Blair moving > the world to wars. That’s
a complete turn-off. > > In my view, Obama is a hope for liberation for both
the minorities and the > many others trapped in the ‘color’ panorama. The
latest smear campaign > against the guy about attending ‘dara’ at younger
age, or being from a Muslim > family is in fact a plus to the guy. The Clinton
Campaign is not scoring points > with it. In fact, hardly will any listen to
them. If such is to be raised at > all, then that would violate the very
religious tolerance they are preaching. > It brings to memory our Muslim brother
in Congress from Minnesota whose > records of modesty is in the open-The
Honorable Keith Ellision (May God prolong > his life.) The US congress came to
disarray upon his decision to take oath > using the Holy Quran then. The ‘
storms in the tea-cups’ then were not justified > because what you believe in,
take oath with it. > > Lastly, Haruna missed the beauty of Chicago when he had
an opportunity to > grace UGAMA on Labor Day (September 2007) at the mid-west
conference. He was no > where to be seen or heard on the phone despite
numerous fruitless efforts, > but those that did will not tease at Chicago in the
way he did. > > So my challenge to him is to layout John Edward Darboe’s plan
of actions.> > Otherwise, thanks for the debate, and all three of you have
some educative > points.> > Regards, > Yero. > > > > > > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007
13:39:50 -0500> From: [log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: > John Edwards/
Haruna/Jabou.> To: [log in to unmask]> > Amen, Ms > Jabou you said it all.>
> > -----Original Message-----> From: [log in to unmask]> > To:
[log in to unmask]> Sent: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 8:11 am> Subject: Re: > John Edwards/
Haruna/Jabou.> > > > Haruna,> I have to confess that you lost > my interest when
you delved into "Chicago > hitside" Chicago shitside?> ren't > you just a
tad bit angry for a discussion that is supposed to help you > in > friends and
influence people on behalf of the candidate you profess to > > upport?> fter
reading your last response, I had a hard time trying to discern > whether >
ours was a personal anger towards Barack Obama because he was of mixed >
race, > ttended Harvard and was president of the Harvard Law Review, or was a >
community > rganizer in the South side of Chicago and failed to include all >
the Ghettos in > he United States in that effort and you think all of these >
are supposed to be > ndictments against him or if your truly feel that the >
way to promote Edwards > as to drag his opponents in the gutter?> I
guarantee > you that if you ran your response by any camp of the Edwards > ampaign,
they > would have asked you not to post it.> have never seen John Edwards
drag his > opponents reputation or record in the > utter because he is
intelligent enough > to know that this is hardly a way to win > otes and that people
are sick and > tired of this sort of senseless tirades.> ohn Edwards speaks
about how in his > youth, he witnessed lawyers and judges in > is native South
Carolina> > > stand up against racism during the civil rights era and how
they risked their > > ives and had to be escorted to work by Federal Marshalls
and yet, they kept > > n. He speaks of the admiration he had for these people
standing up against > > acism. He would not wonder if people would vote for
Obama because he is of > > ixed race.> Edwards may have sued insurance
companies and won some > judgements against them, > ut that has not resulted in any
changes that prevent > insurance companies > inding loopholes to pay out
claims. Just ask the victims of > Katrina.> nd the case for which Edwards won
the largest judgement was for a > family whose > hild got her hair or was it a
limb caught in the drainage > system of a swimming > ool.> What supporters of
the various candidates should > concentrate on is to present > hat their
candidate can do for the people when > elected so they can convince > oters that
they are the right person and how they > do t hat matters a great > eal.
Engaging in maligning the other candidate > as a strategy to win supporters >
ever works and tends to be symptomatic of > some personal issue the those who
> ngage in it may have. Also, when > supporters engage in the latter, they
become > iabilities as opposed to being assets.> > ake it easy Haruna, rage
does not draw in people, it makes them head in the > > pposite direction and it
is bad for the heart. It is the people who will > have > he last word.> ow, I
shall leave you to it.> abou > > > -----Original > Message-----> rom: Haruna
Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: > [log in to unmask]> ent: Sun,
16 Dec 2007 6:44 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ > Haruna/Jabou.> > > > > > >
Haruna," Jabou.> Yes Ma'am, hope all's well. Good to hear > you again.> > Too
long winded so I will be brief." Jabou.> > cannot for the > life of me,
believe mine own ears. Jabou? Dis-ease for > ong-windedness? As > Rocco Mediate is
wont to quip of Tiger, If there ever were a > > ood time to > die, I'm red to
go. Jabou, I'm extremely sorry for my long winds. > I will have > been
remiss were I not to have been comprehensive with your > ueries of John >
Edwards. In addition, I intended to share other value-added > rocess for >
discernment.> > remmembered a good friend of mine, Corporate attorney Charles >
McClure > hared, "Haruna, our job is to discourage our clients' customers from >
desiring > etail and comprehension without running roughshod to minimalist >
law. My > lients include Insurance Agencies and multi-national corporations". >
The ones > ho > eem to own just about everything Jabou. "And, when it comes
to > any challenge > n courts of law, we encourage fellow corporate attorneys
and > judges, to > eview the entire constitution, ammendments, and precedent
law". > I knew the > reat > harles was unto something. This is exactly the
reason > why John Edwards > hooses cases carefully for advocacy sakes. I enjoy
your long > winds from Foroyaa > > abou. I know you were being sarcastic
but it struck > me befuddled.> > ow then.> > Just a few important points."
Jabou.> > es. > Let'r Rip!> > Edwards fought corporate America on behalf of his
clients as a > litigation > ttorney." Jabou.> > ndeed. John Edwards challenged
the parts of law > that Insurance and drug > ompanies relied on to stifle
claims for errors and > omissions. Indeed. Indeed. > ohn Edwards litigated
profusely and with all his > might, for his clients, the > lliterate of law, the
powerless to challenge > wrongdoing, and in the process, > e forced
clarifications of hitherto > un-interpreted law to yield precedent > hat discouraged
the culprit corporations and > other from taking refuge in > mbiguity. I am
sorry Jabou. Sometimes you must > be long-winded to yield value > ontext and
comprehension. I am told long > directional winds can be harnessed > or >
nergy.> > When he won on behalf of > those clients, he was paid very well for his
> fforts." Jabou.> > would suppose > so. Lawyers, like carpenters, doctors,
masons, engineers, > nd dishwashers, > must receive value for effort and
productivity. John Edwards > id not choose > to litigate just any infringement.
The ones he chose to > itigate have > national and constitutional dimensions.
His remuneration came > rom > hatever the > judge determines is just penalty
or compensation for victims and > heir > advocate lawyer. The fees for
lawyers are communicated to their clients > rior to > representation. They are
normally a percentage of the settlement or > enalty > for corporate wrongdoing.
Whether John Edwards was paid very well or > ot, is > not terribly
significant to me. Whatever he was paid, he invested > eavily in > his foundations (the
poverty center, One America, The Ninth ward of > ew > Orleans, Carolina's
poor and dispossessed. All while his wife Libby was > nder > doctor's care for
terminal illness. Barak, like his wife, is an > ccomplished > lawyer. They
chose to side with corporate interests that John > dwards > erves > notice to.
Comparative values my dear.> > He did not offer his services > gratis when
he sued those corporations." > abou.> > should think not. Besides he > has his
wife's medical bills to pay and his > hildren to raise. Further, were > he
to have lost any of the cases, he will not > ave been compensated for his >
fees were reliant on his victory over evil and > urisprudent compensation >
therefrom. That is why John Edwards represented > he indigent and those of >
lesser means than his fees would require. He was > onfident in the victory of >
good over evil, and he took enormous risks of loss.> > Perhaps you can share
> with us the major changes that came about as a result > f Edwards winning
these > lawsuits." Jabou.> > 'm sorry I must be long to do your query justice
my > Jabou.> > . When we desire democracy, whose cardinal tenet is The rule
of common > > aw, we desire that the common comprehends law that contains the
rights and > > rivileges whose aversion by other should trigger judicious
challenge. In a > > ociety where there are some (possibly one partner to that
law), who are > > blivious > o this rule of law and democracy indigents harp
on about. That is > where the > eed for lawyers comes in. They are the bedrock
of due-diligence > and > emocracy. John Edwards being a lawyer,
intrinsically accrues value to > any > ociety > n which he practices.> > . Lawyers
choose from several areas of > practice. Not all lawyers choose > ases for
advocacy for the indigent. John > Edwards chose advocacy law. He is > aluable to
democracy and equal justice > under the law.> > . When John Edwards wins his
cases, a precedent in law is > established so > hat no matter which of the
contiguous United States including > Hawaii that are > artner to the constitution,
may rely on such precedent. That > assists in > iscouraging fraudulent
practice by rogue corporations who seem > to own just > bout > verything.> > .
Jabou, you and I, though never among > John Edwards' direct clientele, are >
urrently benefitting from John Edwards' > legal victories. For the specific >
aws and precedent, I refer you to the > public records of John Edwards'
cases.> > Speaking of votes that have had a major > impact on American lives, I
would > ay none top that list more than the Iraq > war." Jabou.> > ow do you
mean??? I beg to differ. I do agree that the senate > of which John > dwards was
a part, approved a military campaign to apprehend > Saddam and > ring him to
answer to charges of mass murder and belligerent > foreboding. Many >
raquis, Iranians, and Kuwaitis lost their lives and > liberties at the hand of >
addam. Perhaps I would agree with you that the campaign > was badly >
rosecuted. For which Edwards cannot be to blame. He saw fit > however, to > pologise
for > hatever part he may have played in the cantankerous > prosecution of a
> ampaign of conscience. A Solid Human. I make no apologies > for John
Edwards.> > and Edwards voted for the war" Jabou.> > ohn Edwards voted > along with
his coleagues to approve a military campaign > n Iraq. Not for > the Iraq
war we now witness. He is being magnanimous in > emorse of poor > prosecution
of the campaign. I would like John Edwards to > pprove > military > campaign
against me in that manner. And I will not require apology > f him.> > and >
it has impacted American lives as well altered how America is viewed > y the >
World forever." Jabou.> > ndeed. Anything America does, impacts on the lives
> of Americans and world > itizens in a big way. That is why circumspect and
> due-diligence is advised in > rosecutions of campaigns.> > Haruna, your >
amazingly harsh rhetoric against Obama is bordering on the > swift boat"
strategy > of the last elections." Jabou.> > am not familiar with the Swift Boat
> incident. I therefore do not consider > t in demarches. I am sorry you
regard our > exchange here as harsh rhetoric > gainst Obama for on mine own part,
I know no > personal cause to spurn at him, > ut for the general. Besides,
in my effort > to solicit support for John > dwards, it will be utterly
foolhardy to offend > other, including Obama. You and > I > ust leave open, the
prospect of future > collaboration between John Edwards and > arack Obama.
Here, we engage in > studious discernments and recognition of > omparative
values. I advice temperance > toward John Edwards.> > you don't want the angry
label being made against > your candidate to be true > or his supporters."
Jabou.> > hould the angry label > be self-fulfilling against John Edwards, We will
> nvent commensurate > compassion and understanding. We are children of
God/Allah. > > abbil Aalameen.> > > Enough of negative campaigning already!
Another reason why Obama is a > reath > of fresh air?" Jabou.> > ndeed Obama is a
breath of fresh air. John Edwards > is Freshivating.> > Have a good weekend."
Jabou.> > hank you my sister. As if > Allah was aware of your prayer. I made
merry and > roduced value for other > this weekend. I pray for your glorious
sustenance > ll weekends. Thank you for > the prayer.> > our bestest
brother, Haruna.> -----Original Message-----> > rom: Haruna Darbo
<[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent: > Sat, 15 Dec 2007 3:54 pm>
ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > > > > > > "Haruna," Jabou.> > es Darling, how
are you. I like the way you speak and what you > say always. > ou have an
immensely powerful voice fertilized, as our friend > Karim is > ont > o
drammatize, by prolific study, acumen, and measured tone. > Any candidate > ould like
to have your support. I'm not giving up on Ousman > either. I love > im >
very much. Just don't get any funny ideas Ousman.> "I do > not know that what
Edwards can represent to the American people is > ot the > same as what Obama
will." Jabou.> I was under the same impressions too. Then I > began a study
of senators who > ater run for President in a revolutionarily > different way
that reviews > arginal values. There is a wealth of information > that when
properly > eviewed > r > eviewed in the directions of questions one > might
have when making marginal > istinction assessments, you will come > away with
a benign but discerning > onclusion. If you review the matters/bills > that
Clinton, Obama, and > dwards > ave > ffered votes on in the senate, (not > the
ones Obama and Clinton > onveniently > bsented themselves on for >
expediency sakes), you can draw important > emographic information from their affect
> on Americans, both in quantity > nd > uality > hat has brought me to the >
conclusion that Edwards is a more valuable > hange to > more Americans than >
either Obama or Clinton. I had also come to the > onclusion that Obama will
be a > more valuable change to immigrant Americans > han > ither Edwards or
Clinton, > and that Clinton is the hungriest of them all to > > ecome
President. Take a > look at how many bills Obama and Clinton absented > hemselves
from voting on > and find out what those bills are. Then look at > he > ills >
ll three voted > on and you will notice that Edwards never absented himself >
rom voting on > critical and significant matters as well as those matters >
hat > re > politically inexpedient to vote on. A solid human.Let us know how
your > eview looks > like.> "Also, I do not think that there is any
indication that Obama beileves > in > eligion as other than a moral compass." Jabou.>
Probably not and I did > not qualify Obama's belief in that realm. I shared >
dwards' belief in the > realm.> bama had recognized the value of religious
congregations and the almost > > omplete patronage of evangelists by
Republicans. Given his political > > ndustriousness, he embarked on a campaign to
wrest a slice of this section > f > > ociety > rom Republicans and rightly so. I
happen to believe that you neither > court > or discount the religious
evangelist vote. You allow them to choose > > ithout > iving the facade of their
participation as a group in governance > and > dministration of the state. An
active campaign to woo them trends too > > losely > o > uid-pro-quo and if
you do not deliver their perceived quid, > they can > everely > align your
administration. Only a seasoned governor and > policy-maker can > ecognize these
subtle flaws in character. Because as you > know, the > vangelists > are
active voters and they vote in order to skew public > policy in favour of > >
heir religion. They do not hide their intentions and > motives. It takes a >
trong character to resist the temptation to maligned > judgement. When you > sk
> bama, he frames his responses this way:> We have to > show America that
Democrats too care about religion". That > tatement itself > says a lot about
his dispensation. Jabou, I know that you > re a > devout > muslim. Have you
ever felt like you have to show me and Suntou and > alanding > how much you
care about Islam? If you begin to run for President, > nd > you > then embark on
an active campaign to show us how much you care about > slam, > > hether
that is good or not, would it not give me pause in distinctions? Our > > riend
Ousman shared that Obama fought for the downtrodden in the south side > > f
Chicago. I will share more on this later but that southside vote was > > hat >
ained Obama the state seat against an incumbent democrat, also African > >
merican. When you delve deeper into Obama's activities in South Chicago, > ou
> > ill come to the realisation that there are other communities in Chicago >
> hat > ere down-trodden for one reason or the other. But Obama chose these
> other > own-trodden people of South Chicago. Edwards running as senator in
North > > arolina fought for the down-trodden in other areas of North
Carolina, > > outh > arolina, Georgia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Massachussetts,
Alabama, and > > alifornia. > peak with Jimmy Carter and ask him to share his views
on Obama > and > dwards. He > will tell you he loves both of them but that
Edwards is > more valuable to > ll > merica than Obama. It is not because
Edwards is white > and more Americans > re white that is why we say this. It is
because of the > quality of his > alues > nd since African Americans are
disproportionately > disenfranchised in all > tates, they received the value of
Edwards' efforts more > than Whites. > dwards > oes not apologise for that.
When the question arose in > one of the debates > bout > bama being black and
Clinton being a woman, John > Edwards responded, and in > > ublic, that whoever
does not vote for Obama > because he is black, or > linton > ecause she is a
woman, he, John Edwards does > NOT want your vote. Now the > ntrained eye
will view this as political > suicide and indeed it costed > dwards > ome white
support because they began > labelling him as an angry candidate. > f >
ourse they cannot make a distinction > between anger and passion and half of >
hose idiots belong in an insane asylum > anyways, we just don't have a >
omprehensive mental health intitution in the > US that is why some of these >
etards > ind their way on talk shows and > radio programs and TV interviews.
Obama > as a > een eye on the Presidency, has > had even before the "grassroots
downtrodden > dvocacy" in SOuth Shitown.> "As > for being beholden to
corporate America, well, all American presidents > re > somewhat beholden to
corporate America, and the difference is perhaps > ust > > matter of degrees."
Jabou.> Let us say you are right in the immediate above. > You are therefore >
dmitting > hat corporate America does command inordinate > and a formidable
power to > oerce American Presidents. The same will > therefore be true of
Evangelic > merica. Now Edwards actually challenged the powers > of corporate
America in > he > court of law and won overwhelmingly. He > therefore helped stem
the cancer in > orporate America and enhanced the good in it > for the
prosperity of America. > n > his campaign speeches when he ran with > Kerry and
now, he has always served > otice that he is immune to corporate > control, no
matter how formidable that > ay > be. And another thing. I think > your
recognition that both Edwards and Obama > ill represent refreshing change > in the
American Presidency gives you hope > hat > the two will be different > from
past American Presidents. We all therefore > ake solace in the idea of an >
Edwards or Obama Presidency. You will however > > gree with me that in >
America, Just being President does not innoculate the > rdinary American from the
> relentl;ess onslaught of Pharmaceutical and > ther > orporate interests. We
> must therefore go further than just the Presidency > f > t > s the
refreshing > change we are really interested in. It has come to light > hat most of
Obama's > advisors are leftover Clinton advisors. You may > emmember > hen
one of > those advisors disrespectfully tried to malign the former > resident
Bill > Clinton. And Obama shared with us that the former Clinton > dvisor was
> peaking of > his past relations with Bill Clinton and therefore he, Obama
is > ot privy > to that and cannot say anything on it. And the former Clinton
> dvisor is now > an Obama advisor. Discernments. I also would like our >
rother > nd > riend > Ousman to share with us one tangible value accrued from
Obama's > campaign for > down-trodden votes in south SHitown". It is evident
that the > nited > teel > workers of America, The united Mine Workers of the
same nation, The > > arpenters Union, and many more see more value in John
Edwards than Obama, > linton, > or other. Is there a national union of the
un-employed of South > hicago? We > > ay be presented with mirages of "grassroots
campaign for votes" and > > grassroots conscientious advocacy".> "Having
said that, Obama has spoken out > against the insurance companies who > re at
the top of the food chain when it > comes to corporate America because > hey
own just about everything." Jabou.> > Exactly my point Jabou. First, you should
never speak against any corporate > r > individual interest because they own
just about everything. That is the > > rong impetus. Now John Edwards did
not stop at speaking out against rogue > > orporate policies, he challenged
them in courts on the behalf of Americans > nd > > overcame their enormous
powers. He is only a lawyer as was Obama. Has Obama > > > iled suit against any
rogue corporate policy on the behalf of the common > > merican? Those
insurance companies he "spoke out against", has he > > hallenged > hem > n a court of
law on the merits or demerits of his disdain of them? > Obama > as head of
the Harvard Law Review. If Obama finds himself in a > situation > here >
vote-counting can yield a loss of his election to a Republican > candidate, > hat
do you think will happen? What do you think Obama will do?> > "You are
right, I like both Edwards and Obama, and I think that Edwards is > > > reat
candidate, but I do not think that he will win the primaries." Jabou.> > I think
you are looking at the polls of those who view Edwards as an angry > >
andidate. Look deeper and follow the citizens of Iowa, New Hampshire, > outh > >
arolina, and Nevada. We are talking about primaries aren't we???? Check > >
round your neck of the woods around Cleveland Tennessee, Chattanooga, > > emphis,
> ashville, Jackson, Milan, etcetera. Let us know what you find out.> "He >
is good but America sees him as having been part of the old > stablishment >
even if only because he ran before." Jabou.> I know you're just being >
sarcastic here. Who among all candidates, > epublican or Democratic, has not been
> part of the old Establishment. Don't > e > wayed > y cliches of these
lunatics > who fell through the administrative cracks for > ack of enough space
at > rehab.> "I think Obama on the other hand stands a very good chance of
winning the > > rimaries and Americans are angry enough at the republicans so
that none of > > heir candidates stands a chance in the national elections, no
matter who > > hey > re." Jabou.> Indeed Jabou. I agree with you. Obama does
stand a very > good chance of > inning at least one of the primaries if not
all. As far as the > anger of > mericans > t Republicans, I presume you share
that all the > democratic candidates > tand > qual chances when pitted
against a Republican. We can > all cherish that but > et us focus for now on the
voting democrats for the > democratic primaries. > hat we are trying to
discern is "EDwards, Obama, or > Clinton, who represents > he > most valuable and
desirable change for > Democratic Americans". After the > rimaries, we will
change our effort by removing the > word democratic from > ur > uery.> "So a
wonderful and winning strategy for > Democrats this time would be an >
bama/Edwards ticket." Jabou.> That > wouldn't be a bad ticket either. If that ends
up being the ticket it > ould be > formidable. It will be more formidable
against the Republicans in > ll > f America > if it turns out to be
Edwards-Biden, Edwards-Clinton, > dwards-Obama, or > Edwards-Gore. What do you think????>
"Together, they can restore the hopes of > the people and make great headway
> owards reversing the damage that the last 8 > years of a Bush >
dministration > as done" Jabou.> Anything is a refreshing > change from the last 8 years
of cluelessness.> "Thanks for providing the link > to Ousman's blog, I had
not known of it > efore. As for Andrew Young Ousman, > he dances to the music
of corporate > merica > and so he has to pay the > piper so no surprises
there. He has now made a > areer > f leading the pillagers > and plunderers into
Africa. Dr King is no doubt > urning in his grave." > Jabou.> This is not
fair. I have contributed in forming a comprehensive alliance > > gainst my
person and Edwards' person. This is not fair Jabou and Ousman. > > he > wo of you
simply are too overwhelming even if I summon the entire > essence > f my >
very being. Please have mercy on me from here on in or pledge not > to gang up
> gainst me and Edwards.> "Jabou" > What Friggin-ever. You mean > Jabou and
Ousman, don't you?? Whew. New > ambians!!> Haruna.> > > ----Original >
Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo <[log in to unmask]>> o: >
[log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26 pm> ubject: Re: John Edwards/ Haruna> > >
> > > > Jabou, you know you are beautiful. I can never get upset at you.> >
I think you like both John Edwards and Obama, but that you like Obama more >
> ecause his election will represent much needed change.> Would you consider
> that the election of John Edwards will also represent > hange?> The work >
therefore is in discerning between John Edwards and Obama, who is > he more
> desirable change!!!> Now, like you about John Edwards, I like Obama a lot
because I > think he is > rilliant, popular, and his election will give hope
to a lot of > Immigrant > mericans.> John Edwards not only represents hope
for more > Americans than Obama, he has > > hown the value of the change that
he may accrue > us. I have not had the > pportunity to witness a sampling of
Obama's change > except that he looks > ifferent > rom past presidents.> John
Edwards' One Americ> a Foundation offers some hope.> ohn Edwards' rebuilding
efforts in the Lower > Ninth ward offer hope in what > > merica can be.> ohn
Edwards fought with > Huge corporate outfits on the behalf of regular > nd >
ommon Americans, and John > Edwards and Obama are both lawyers.> enator John
Edwards of North carolina > will get dirty for you and with you.> orth
Carolina used to be the home of > Senator Jesse Helms.> ohn Edwards enjoys
enormous peer support and the most > endorsements from > emocratic governors of
states than either Obama or Clinton.> > ohn Edwards is more electable across the
United states than any candidate > > urrently seeking the presidency,
Republican or Democrat. Check the stats.> > ibby Edwards is beautiful and is not
beholden to corporate America. Mrs. > bama > is beautiful but may be beholden to
corporate America. She sits on > he > > board of Walmart.> ohn Edwards is
handsome and is not given to religious > distinctions nor > oes > e believe
religion ought to be mixed with governance. John > Edwards > elieves > n
Religion as moral and ethical compass, not > administrative compass.> Obama is good.
John Edwards is more valuable to all America. > Edwards-Obama > ay be
formidable. What do you think my dear? Lemme know, Lemme > know!! You > now >
usman is an Obama-head!!! Don't you??> Your friend and > colleague Haruna. > In a
message dated 12/13/2007 8:40:01 P.M. Mountain Standard > Time, >
[log in to unmask] writes:> Haruna,> I both like and have a great deal of > respect for John
Edwards and his wife > lizabeth for many reasons, some of > which are
mentioned below. However, > > m > n Obama supporter myself. I also > think Obama
has a better chance of > eing > lected because among other > things, he is seen
as the "change" candidate > y > country that desperately needs > change and
Hillary ain't it. Infact, I > hink Hillary has turned into a "snake > oil
sales lady" and she is > verything to > everyone in her zeal to be > president
and I do not trust her at all and the > est of the country is beginning > to
see through her. I think that Edwards' > est > shot will be as a V.P for >
Obama. I think together they would make an > wesome > eam.> ow, now, don't get
> too upset.> abou> > > > > ----Original Message-----> rom: Haruna Darbo >
<[log in to unmask]>> o: [log in to unmask]> ent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007
> 6:49 pm> ubject: I wish to share John Edwards with you:> > > > > > e just >
concluded another conference call with David Medina, the national > >
ampaign > director for John Edwards.> We are excited about the prospects for a John
Edwards > Presidency. We are > leased to have the support of Harry Belafonte
and Danny > Glover in South > arolina. Our gratitude to the United Steel
workers Union, > The Mine > orkers > Union, > he Carpenters Union, and Friends
of the Earth > Action Network. I am proud > f > ohn Edwards' performance in
the just concluded > democratic candidate > ebate > > ponsored by the Des
Moines Register. John > Edwards is humble, intelligent, > nd > tands up for the
Common American even > on unpopular issues. He has vision > > nd > haracter,
attributes that are > extremely valuable to American foreign > olicy > nd
stature in the world.> We > would like volunteers to assist in South Carolina,
Iowa, Nevada, and > ew > > Hampshire. We also wish to ask for your financial
support if your time > ill > ot > allow volunteering. Please visit us at
_http://www.johnedwards.com_ > > http://www.johnedwards.com) and thank you for
your support and company > oward > > > ne-America.> Haruna.> > > >
*************************************See AOL's > top rated recipes > http://food.aol.>
com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)>
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> o > unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of
postings, go to the Gambia-L Web > > nterface> t:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search in the > Gambia-L archives, go to: >
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List
Management, please send an e-mail to:> > [log in to unmask]> >
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤> > > > > >
_______________________________________________________________________> ore new
features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - > > ttp://webmail.aol.com> > o
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go > to the Gambia-L Web
> nterface> t: > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> To Search
in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> o contact the List Management, please > send an e-mail
to:> [log in to unmask]> > > >
________________________________________________________________________> More new features than > ever.
Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com> > >
����������������������������������������������������������> To >
unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web >
interface> at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search >
in the Gambia-L archives, go to: >
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:> >
[log in to unmask]> >
����������������������������������������������������������> >
_________________________________________________________________> Share life as it happens with the
new Windows Live.>
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_122007> > > > > > > **************************************See
AOL's top rated recipes >
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)> > ������������������������������������������
����������������> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of
postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface> at:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html> > To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to:
http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l> To contact the List Management,
please send an e-mail to:> [log in to unmask]>
����������������������������������������������������������>
_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!
http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlhmtextlink1_dec
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://listserv.icors.org/archives/gambia-l.html
To Search in the Gambia-L archives, go to: http://listserv.icors.org/SCRIPTS/WA-ICORS.EXE?S1=gambia-l
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
|
