EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS Archives

Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List

EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Fobare <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Evolutionary Fitness Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 17:42:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Robert,

Thanks for the reply! What would be the likely EvFit rationale for doing
such a "reverse hierarchical" set? Is there something wrong with the way
Art's concepts? Or is it just a case of using variety to avoid specific
adaptation?

Dave Fobare

>Strip sets entail starting with a heavy weight,performing several reps,
>imediatly grabing a lighter weight, performing several reps ...etc. One
>usually does this for perhaps three strip or drop sets.  For example in
>Pavels book it is recomended to perform snatches with -32kg,24kg,16kg (the
>minus sign(-) denotes a strip set). these sets are very demanding but highly
>productive.
>Robert
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the list send an email to
>[log in to unmask] with the words SIGNOFF EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS
>in the _body_ of the email.
>
>To get a copy of the old archives or the FAQ, look in the EvFit folder at
>http://briefcase.yahoo.com/dryeraser

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send an email to [log in to unmask] with the words SIGNOFF EVOLUTIONARY-FITNESS in the _body_ of the email.

To get a copy of the old archives or the FAQ, look in the EvFit folder at http://briefcase.yahoo.com/dryeraser

ATOM RSS1 RSS2