Brad,
I get your message to stop it, but a lot of your message was Greek to
me!  GRIN!
Kathy


At 01:27 PM 2/19/2005, you wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>I hope I'm not speaking out of turn here. but out of the intent to not see
>a repeat of email history, I hope I don't come across the wrong way by
>saying, STOP IT, just STOP IT!!! hahahahahahaha. . Of course I mean the
>timber of that comment in jest, as a funny, come on smile, I wasn't being
>mean,  awww come on, there we go, nice smile by the way, but would ask you
>to consider as Phil said the transparency of the posts as they are very
>viewable on-line and I'm sure being read... *waving in thin air* "Hi
>Chris". Aside from that I do know of one person on this list who indeed
>left because of the many responses to his original posts, and not entirely
>of his posts themselves... and no it isn't Chocolate Paul who I'm referring
>to, but a anonomous current lister, filters work well for some folks, but
>it is not a desire to filter everyone who replies. Not everyone has
>experienced the many things Chris has shared, said, and etc.also viewable
>on line if you care to see, and all that followed afterwards in the form of
>trying to defend one's intent to him. He is, for now, off list as far as I
>know, and. I might suggest to not let the same email viral affect occur in
>the form of defending one's messages, without Chris' even benefiting from
>the attention of viewing them on list. Just a friendly plea from a fellow
>list member. Don't hit me don't hit me please. Ouch! Mommy!! ahahah.
>
>There, for the grace of god, go I.
>
>Brad
>   .