National Council on Disability Says Access to Electronic and Information
Technology is a Civil Right

National Council on Disability Says Access to Electronic
and Information Technology is a Civil Right

WASHINGTON-The National Council on Disability (NCD) today released an
excerpt on Section 508 and electronic and information technology
(E&IT) from its soon-to-be-released report, National Disability
Policy: A Progress Report for December 2001-2002. Among other things,
NCD recommends that the 108th Congress act promptly to apply Section
508 to itself.

Background
In 1998, Congress amended the Rehabilitation Act to require federal
agencies to make their electronic and information technology
accessible to people with disabilities. Inaccessible technology
interferes with a person's ability to obtain and use information
quickly and easily. Section 508 was enacted to eliminate barriers in
information technology, to make available new opportunities for people
with disabilities, and to encourage development of technologies that
will help achieve these goals. The law applies to all federal agencies
when they develop, procure, maintain, or use electronic and
information technology. Under Section 508, agencies must give
employees with disabilities and members of the public access to
information that is comparable to the access available to others.

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act also requires federal agencies
in their procurement of E&IT to purchase goods and services accessible
to persons with disabilities, except where certain exceptions such as
unavailability or technological impossibility or undue burden apply.

On June 21, 2001, the day Section 508 regulations went into effect,
NCD held a news conference to highlight the release of its report, The
Accessible Future
(http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/accessiblefuture.html).
Among other things, the report found that access to E&IT is a civil
right and there is a need for a national accessibility policy.


Early Returns
The year 2002 has continued to witness the growth and refinement of
useful resources, particularly information resources needed by
government procurement officials, E&IT vendors and citizens with
disabilities to all better understand their rights, responsibilities
and opportunities under the law. Such efforts as the General Services
Administration (GSA)-sponsored Federal Information Technology
Accessibility Initiative (FITAI) have produced and maintained the Web
portal http://www.section508.gov. Information about accessible
products, lists of federal agency Section 508 contact designees plus
other valuable information is forthcoming through that site. At the
same time, the GSA-sponsored Accessibility Forum has strengthened the
partnership between the federal government, industry and consumer
groups in coming to consensus under the new law. Additionally, a
number of other federally supported resources have been developed to
provide relevant information and technical assistance to other key
sectors such as the education system and state governments.

But while awareness of, information about, and access to resources
necessary for complying with Section 508 have all increased, several
other developments give cause for concern. On the last day of 2002,
notice was published of the federal government's intent to make an
important change in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) governing
the timetable for implementation of the law. Micropurchases (small
purchases made in essence on government credit cards by various
employees outside the formal federal procurement structure) had been
exempt from most 508 requirements through 2002. That deadline has now
been extended by almost another two years.

Though the proportion of E&IT procured through micropurchasing is not
large, the significance of the extension lies in the reasons given for
it. One stated reason was the failure of manufacturers to provide
sufficient package information or other data to allow micropurchase
rs to assess the accessibility of various items. While this failure
surely does not represent a deliberate effort by any sector of
industry to undermine full implementation of the law, the delay does
highlight the vulnerability of the 508 process. This situation
suggests that where industry for whatever reason has failed to take
the lead in implementing a 508 goal or requirement, the government has
been without practical means for achieving compliance. In a business
environment where desire to innovate may be tempered by harsh cost
considerations, and where nonmilitary government purchasing is likely
to grow at a far slower rate than in recent years, concern is
warranted whether the momentum toward compliance with both the letter
and spirit of 508 can be maintained.

A related problem is the unevenness of Section 508 monitoring. As
discussed in detail in last year's report, the law does not contain
provisions for ongoing monitoring of many key practices, such as: the
number of instances in which agencies use the "undue burden" or other
defenses, the alternative methods agencies are using to provide
required access to their employees or the public when E&IT cannot be
made accessible, or even the ways procurement officers are weighting
accessibility in comparison with other legal requirements in
evaluating competitive bids.

While as a practical matter GSA appears to have a good general sense
of what is going on in the proverbial trenches, we believe a more robust
involvement on the part of the Department of Justice (DOJ) would also
be very helpful. NCD recommends that DOJ, in fulfilling its reporting
requirements to the President and Congress under the law, expand its
assessment to include not only the accessibility of federal agency Web
sites (as it has surveyed in the past), but also the degree to which
agencies have met other expectations and resolved persisting issues.
DOJ's next report is due this year.

In addition, a number of key interpretive issues remain that must be
authoritatively resolved if federal procurement officers are to have
the guidance and clarity they need to apply the law consistently and
soundly. Together with industry and the public, they need to know the
answer to such questions as how to define "undue burden" in relation
to a governmental payer. This in turn squarely raises the question,
more pressing than ever in the current fiscal and economic climate, of
how the development costs of accessibility should be allocated between
industry producers and governmental purchasers.

As a component of the Workforce Investment Act, the Rehabilitation
Act, including Section 508, is up for reauthorization this year.
Congress will thus have an opportunity to review 508 fully. NCD hopes
that Congress and the Administration will remain faithful to the
starkly simple goals of equality, and to the enormous potential of
technology, that combined to bring Section 508 into being.

New Laws
Two important new statutes enacted in 2002 may have significant
implications for section 508. The first of these, the Electronic
Government Act of 2002 (E-Government Act) appears to strongly support
Section 508 principles. Indeed, the concepts of greater governmental
communication with the citizenry through electronic means that
underlie both the E-Government Act and Section 508 are very similar.

The E-Government Act signals a new level of centralization and
standardization in the management of governmental information resources.
>From the design of Web sites to the informational content of Web pages,
federal E&IT practices are likely to come more and more under the
management of OMB's new Chief Information Officer. This consolidation
offers potentially valuable support for achieving 508 goals, but much
will depend on the philosophy underlying OMB's overall approach to
e-government. >

Here, the equally profound implications of another major statute must
also be taken into account. The Homeland Security Act will draw over
20 federal agencies together under a unified administrative umbrella,
and for a purpose that necessarily subordinates open and expansive
communication with the public to pressing national security
imperatives. The issues regarding Americans with disabilities posed by
the new department will be discussed at greater length in Chapter 13
of NCD's new report, but one key concern regarding Section 508
must be expressed here. Bearing in mind that 508 contains exceptions
to accessibility requirements for technology used in national security
systems, NCD trusts that the new department will not interpret this
exception in ways that inadvertently undermine the applicability of
Section 508 to the vast bulk of its personnel, public contacts and
ongoing activities.

Congressional Accountability Act
Owing to the separation of powers doctrine under the Constitution,
Congress is not automatically covered by many of the laws administered
by the Executive Branch. This includes civil rights laws such as the
ADA. In 1995, Congress enacted the Congressional Accountability Act
(CAA)  that applied a number of major laws to Congress itself and set
up mechanisms for their administration.

Congress is still not subject to the requirements of Section 508. Nor
are such "Congressional instrumentalities" as the Library of Congress,
the Government Printing Office or the General Accounting Office. In
2001, the Congressional Office of Compliance (which administers the
CAA) recommended that Congress bring itself under the provisions of
Section 508. Although we are not aware of any opposition within
Congress to this recommendation, or any serious dispute with the
reasoning of the Office's recommendation, no action has thus far been
taken.

The Library of Congress (as well as the Government Printing Office)
have announced that they will voluntarily comply with Section 508's
requirements. In addition, the U.S. House of Representatives has
recommended that all offices and committees make their Web sites
voluntarily 508-compliant; House Information Services is assisting
offices in this effort. Moreover, the upgraded Senate Web site will be
508-compliant.

NCD commends the Congressional Office of Compliance (OOC) for
describing its efforts, to date, in addressing the exclusion of the
U.S. Congress from coverage under Section 508 (See,
http://www.compliance.gov/reports-studies/ada_12-02/ada_report.pdf,
specifically, pages 16-17). In its report, the Board of
Directors of the Office of Compliance has recommended that Congress
amend the Congressional Accountability Act to incorporate
the substantive public access and employee access requirements of
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. See Interim Section
102(B) Report: Electronic Information Systems, OOC Board of Directors
(November 13, 2001).

Recommendation to Congress
Believing that in this age of E-government no justification can exist
for Congress not to embrace accessibility, NCD recommends that the
108th Congress act without delay to enter the electronic age by
immediately and comprehensively applying Section 508 to itself.

For more information, contact NCD's Mark Quigley or Martin Gould
at 202-272-2004.
[log in to unmask]

--

Fred Fay
Guest Justice-For-All Moderator
[log in to unmask]


NOTE: Some Internet Providers (including AOL, Earthlink and
Juno) may see JFA postings as spam because of the large
volume of JFA mail recipients and fail to deliver the
posting. If this happens more than a few times, the JFA
system may automatically unsubscribe some email
addresses. Should you stop receiving JFA Alerts, please
subscribe to JFA again as per the instructions at
http://www.jfanow.org.

PLEASE Empty your email inbox regularly.
JFA deletes subscribers that are consistently over their
message quota. If you stop using an account please unsubscribe
that old account.  With hundreds of inbound emails and
thousands of outbound emails daily. JFA can not respond to
every message.

We thank you for your understanding and continued outstanding advocacy!

--

JUSTICE FOR ALL -- A Free Service of the
American Association of People with Disabilities
http://www.aapd-dc.org     http://www.jfanow.org

There's strength in numbers!  Be a part of a national
coalition of people with disabilities and join AAPD today.
http://www.aapd-dc.org

=====================================================================
                Justice-For-All FREE Subscriptions
  To subscribe or unsubscribe, send mail to [log in to unmask]
        with one or the other in the body of your message:
                        subscribe justice
                       unsubscribe justice