EASI Archives

Equal Access to Software & Information: (distribution list)

EASI@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Andrews <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
* EASI: Equal Access to Software & Information
Date:
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:19:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Maybe those technologies weren't adopted because they were to expensive,
didn't offer clear enough benefits, or both?

At 09:01 AM 6/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>when you consider the fact that mobility instructors did not adopt such
>technologies as the sonic flashlight (mowat sensor) I don't have a lot of
>confidence on that score. But that's why we have to try to change the
>system. After all, the system consists of just people.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Peter Meijer" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:54 AM
>Subject: Re: CBS Artificial Vision Story
>
>
> > Joe notes
> >
> > > It is my sincere belief that agencies for the blind need to get up to
> > speed
> > > with this new technology in order to train consumers how to use it
> > safely.
> >
> > How probable is it that agencies for the blind will do this?
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Peter Meijer
> >
> >
> > Seeing with Sound - The vOICe
> > http://www.seeingwithsound.com/winvoice.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2