CHOMSKY Archives

The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky

CHOMSKY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
William Meecham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The philosophy, work & influences of Noam Chomsky
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:04:10 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
This diversion of part of the left to good old anti-communism
is good old hat--and does great damage to the left
wcm
>
> --WebTV-Mail-31876-3363
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
>
> To those interested in antiwar issues, a debate is raging on Proyect's
> marxism LIST.      The debate centers around the DSP, ISWoR, and the
> Albert ZNet grouping that is calling for ....Russian Hands Off
> Chechnya.....instead of US Hands Off The Caucsus.
>
> Other issues being raised are Saddam/ Iraq,  Milosevic/ Kosova,  and
> East Timor.    Also of issue,  is why the antiwar movement is not being
> built internationally.
>
> Whether you are pro or con, the experiences of the debating of these
> issues is now being repeated in other,  broader and broader circles.
> And just like on some other LISTS, the majority of people seem to have
> the desire that those discussing these issues,  would just go and  fade
> away.
>
> It's not likely to happen.      The issues are too important.     Feel
> free to come and participate, whatever your angle is.=A0    Below, is my
> recent post to this list.
>
> Tony Abdo
>
>
>
>
> --WebTV-Mail-31876-3363
> Content-Disposition: Inline
> Content-Type: Message/RFC822
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
>
> Received: from mailsorter-103-2.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.103) by
>         storefull-238.iap.bryant.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2000
>         00:42:47 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by mailsorter-103-2.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix) id
>         CD3DE4017; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:42:47 -0800 (PST)
> Delivered-To: [log in to unmask]
> Received: from storefull-232.iap.bryant.webtv.net (storefull-232.iap.bryant.webtv.net
>         [209.240.199.119]) by mailsorter-103-2.bryant.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix)
>         with ESMTP id B9E214016 for <[log in to unmask]>;
>         Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:42:47 -0800 (PST)
> Received: (from production@localhost) by storefull-232.iap.bryant.webtv.net
>         (8.8.8-wtv-e/mt.gso.26Feb98) id AAA18870; Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:42:47
>         -0800 (PST)
> X-WebTV-Signature: 1
>         ETAsAhQDFa+jBJQyfuD2jOZdvqhpUS8YCQIUc4SAier8xeuLWCT9Hbg23LlMOMU=
> From: [log in to unmask] (Tony Abdo)
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:42:47 -0600 (CST)
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: The Silliest Argument of Them All From Recent History
> Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
> Content-Disposition: Inline
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
> MIME-Version: 1.0 (WebTV)
>
> There is a rehash going around of a tired and silly argument, made first
> back when the bombing of Yugoslavia started.       It goes like
> this......People were so turned off, they refused to particpate in
> antiwar activity,  because there were a lot of racist Serbs at the
> rallies......Why were the "racist"  Serbs there? (and yes some Serbs are
> racist)     This is because of why???
>
> The correct answer is..........?    They were there at the rallies
> because the organizers didn't condemn Milosevic!?
> And these beasts turned good, honest citizens away.     It made things
> impossible for us to organize the decent citizenry.
>
> This is a ridiculous line of reasoning.     Those right wing Serbs would
> have been at the rally,  even if every speaker had criticized Milosevic.
> Even if all had carried the sign---No To NATO,  No To Mlosevic----
> It's because their homeland was being bombed, not due to some political
> backwardness in the slogans.
>
> What were the organizers supposed to do?... Oh no, go away!     You have
> no right to protest here,  just because your country is being bombed by
> our alliance.
>
> Would the proponents of the supposedly more correct political line have
> done that?      We'll never know, because they made no effort to either
> organize demonstrations, or even to show up at those organized by
> others.
>
> Wait, some of these people did show up, to report back to the main body
> of their camp with horror stories of Serb "atrocities" at the demos.
> These people are not gentlemen like we are,  was the general refrain.
>
> Oh yes they are.      If your country was being bombed from afar,  every
> one of us would demonstrate, along with The Devil, if that's who would
> be our ally.    So stop criticizing the organizers of the demos.
> Nothing kept the other political line from organizing demos, other than
> their own lack of desire to do so.
>
> Why organize demonstrations against supporting Albanian nationalism,
> when that's precisely what you are supportng in the war?
>
> Tony Abdo
>
>
> --WebTV-Mail-31876-3363--
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2