Jakajk wrote:
>In a message dated 12/5/97 1:21:30 AM, you wrote:
>
>>then a routine would be in place to trace any
>>> additional calls. This statement would then warn the callers to not call.
>
>That ought to stop them right in their tracks, eh?
>

Bullets would stop them in their tracks. For this to happen they should
feel completely comfortable, stupid and unaware.

Consider that all parties mentioned in the original post are heavily
wiretapped, infiltrated and surveilled. There are only a few relevant
possibilities: the call didn't happen; the cops recorded the call; or, the
cops made the call. "Wheatpasted fliers"? Whoever wishes to play in a
government-sponsored sandbox and happily transmit fear and hate is free to
do so. No thanks.

Anyone sensitive to insulting statements as might be said by a six-year-old
could consider installing Net-Nanny as a censorship for children in reverse.
-- Wat Tyler