<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

The labelling law is some success for people who have to avoid gluten 
from their diet. Should be we happy? I am not satisfied with that law 
for following reason.

Most natural food products are not contains gluten; except few grains, 
which would be easy avoided by us. However, fraction of those danger 
grains are unnecessary added to most processed foods. They are mixed in 
totally unexpected foods; like smoked ham, sausages, salami and many 
more, even in raw turkey. That makes our problem to avoid accidently 
expose to gluten virtually impossible; unless we are avoiding 
restaurants and other gathering for meal. In my dictionary gluten is 
poison. There is no substance in the nature, which in so little amount 
cause so many health problems. Most of us on the list are agreement with 
me.

The labelling products as "gluten free" does not help us a lot. We would 
be restricted on small amount of products labelling as "gluten free". 
Many producers will avoid putting those labels on their products, 
because of danger to be prosecuted. Perhaps their products are not 
containing gluten but they are not labelling for above mentioned reason.

The labelling should say "the product contains gluten". It just makes 
sense. We do not read on any food product: "mercury free" or lead free, 
because it is just obvious. It is also obvious, when I buying smoked 
ham, or raw turkey not expecting gluten there. According to Dr. Alessio 
Fasano everybody's health is affected; some less; some more. There are 
many smart and influential people on this list who should continue 
fighting, until gluten will be dark history in mankind.

What do you think?

Al from Toronto Canada


*Support summarization of posts, reply to the SENDER not the Celiac List*
*******
To unsubscribe, email: mailto:[log in to unmask]
*******