CELIAC Archives

Celiac/Coeliac Wheat/Gluten-Free List

CELIAC@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 25 Nov 1997 04:56:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

> As both(?) posted to the list,  Dr. Green and Dr. Murray presented results
> at Digestive Diseases Week last spring that indicated that antibody tests
> from commmercial (not research) labs at the time of diagnosis had a
> sensitivity of much less than 100% (only 50% in one case).

Just a thought on the above statement:

If the anti-body test results are not that sensitive, what does that say
about  "fatty stool tests" or any other for that matter in making a diagnosis?
I believe, in the past there was some discussion about the biopsies
having a problem also as well as the rectal gluten challange?

Where exactly does a correct diagnosis lay and is an accurate one
really possible?

Dennis
---------------------------------------------------------
Web Address Home Page: http://www.gate.net/~imxtc4u

Personal Quote changed:  15 Nov. 1997

Your birth certificate guarantees your death.
It's irrelevant whether it happens 1 minute after birth,
100 years later or any time in between.  The outcome
is predestined and always the same.

                By Dennis J. Tonetti

ATOM RSS1 RSS2