<<Disclaimer: Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

I too have been frustrated with "GF" airline food. I've also been extrememly
jealous of protections being put in place for those allergic to peanuts, not
only in airplanes, but also in school cafeterias (my second-grade son is the
celiac). However, I wonder if the use of ADA in the peanut situation really
would work for us. Although some celiacs have a reaction to gluten (possibly
even airborne gluten) that is severe, even anaphylactic shock, it is my (lay
person's) understanding that this is very rare. Celiac disease usually isn't
immediately life-threatening.

Peanut allergies are probably relatively rare as well, but there are a
significant number that are clinically proven to be life-threatening. I don't
see a direct parallel with celiac disease. Do we honestly think the US court
system will mandate this kind of ADA special treatment for ALL
allergies/intolerances? I doubt it. And remember we're talking about peanuts
here, going after wheat (and the other grains) would truly be hitting very
powerful interest groups in the "bread basket." Our society is dependent on
wheat as a source of income and nutrition. I'm not sure we're justified in
demanding "gluten-free zones."

If we're going to test ADA, let's do it in a conciliatory manner rather than a
combative one. Instead of comparing it to the peanut thing, how about comparing
it to wheelchair ramps (i.e. provide us with a viable *alternative*). I don't
know that I'd want celiac awareness to be raised if it means being viewed as a
militant fringe group looking not only for special treatment but also for
revenge!

Just my humble opinion - no personal attacks intended.

Tami
Minnesota, USA